background preloader

Checklists / Critical appraisal

Facebook Twitter

Diverse literatuur-beoordelingslijsten / Critical appraisal tools

Cochrane Netherlands - Beoordelingsformulieren en andere downloads. CASP Tools & Checklists. This set of eight critical appraisal tools are designed to be used when reading research, these include tools for Systematic Reviews, Randomised Controlled Trials, Cohort Studies, Case Control Studies, Economic Evaluations, Diagnostic Studies, Qualitative studies and Clinical Prediction Rule.

CASP Tools & Checklists

These are free to download and can be used by anyone under the Creative Commons License. CASP Checklists (click to download) Some Study Designs..... What is a Systematic Review? Frequently there will have been more than one study addressing a particular health question. What is a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT)?

An RCT is a type of interventional or experimental study design. What is a Qualitative study? A qualitative study examines the experiences and beliefs of people from their own perspective. Critical Appraisal Tools. Zoekmachine voor beoordelingslijsten. Critical Appraisal Tools - Sansom Institute for Health Research. Critical appraisal is an integral process in Evidence Based Practice.

Critical Appraisal Tools - Sansom Institute for Health Research

Critical appraisal aims to identify methodological flaws in the literature and provide consumers of research evidence the opportunity to make informed decisions about the quality of research evidence. Critical appraisal checklists - Cardiff University - Specialist Unit for Review Evidence. Critical Appraisal tools - CEBM. Guidelines - Systematic Reviews - BeckerGuides at Becker Medical Library. Guidelines for Systematic Reviews MECIR (Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews) Standards for the reporting of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) (formerly QUOROM) PRISMA for Abstracts MOOSE (Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) Stroup DF et al.

Guidelines - Systematic Reviews - BeckerGuides at Becker Medical Library

AMSTAR - Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews. CARE case report guidelines. Checklists for Assessing Study Qualities. Use one of our checklists for assessing the methodological quality of a study and improve the design and reporting of your study.

Checklists for Assessing Study Qualities

The methodological quality of studies on measurement properties can be assessed for different purposes, for example, as guidance for designing or reporting your study on measurement properties, to determine the risk of bias in single studies included in a systematic review of outcome measurement instruments or by reviewers or journal editors to appraise the methodological quality of articles or grant applications of studies on measurement properties. Therefore, we have developed the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist, and we are currently developing a COSMIN Study Design checklist and a COSMIN Reporting checklist for these different purposes as the standards included in each checklist will be slightly different. EBRO literatuuronderzoek beoordelen + levels (PDF)

McMaster - Evidence-Based Practice Research Group (OT) Members: Mary Law, Debra Stewart, Nancy Pollock, Lori Letts, Jackie Bosch, Muriel Westmorland, Angela Philpot Best practice in occupational therapy occurs when therapists, working in partnership with client(s), use research evidence along with clinical knowledge and reasoning to implement interventions that are effective.

McMaster - Evidence-Based Practice Research Group (OT)

The McMaster Occupational Therapy Evidence-based Practice group focuses on research to critically review evidence regarding the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions and to develop tools for evaluation of occupational therapy programmes. To date, our group has completed several initiatives, including: Development, evaluate and publication of a Programme Evaluation Workbook, to guide therapists (and rehabilitation teams) in evaluating the effects of their programmes. McMaster University - Guideline Development Checklist. About the Checklist This is a webpage for the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist, which contains a comprehensive list of topics and items outlining the practical steps to consider for developing guidelines.

McMaster University - Guideline Development Checklist

The Guideline Development Checklist project is a partnership between the Guidelines International Network (GIN) and McMaster University. The checklist is intended for use by guideline developers to plan and track the process of guideline development and to help ensure that no key steps are missed. Users of the checklist should become familiar with the topics and the items before applying them. What the Checklist is and what it isn't: The checklist is designed to serve as a publicly available and interactive resource, with links to learning tools and training materials, for those interested in beginning, enhancing or evaluating their guideline development process. MMAT : mixed methods appraisal tool [licensed for non-commercial use only] / FrontPage. Aim of this WIKI: To enable collaborative work for developing a Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

MMAT : mixed methods appraisal tool [licensed for non-commercial use only] / FrontPage

The MMAT is intended to be used as a checklist for concomitantly appraising and/or describing studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews (reviews including original qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies). The MMAT was first published in 2009. Since then, it has been validated in several studies testing its interrater reliability, usability and content validity. The latest version of the MMAT was updated in 2018. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.

GA Wells, B Shea, D O'Connell, J Peterson, V Welch, M Losos, P Tugwell, Nonrandomised studies, including case-control and cohort studies, can be challenging to implement and conduct.

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses

PEDro scale (English) PEDro. The PEDro scale was last amended on 21 June 1999.

PEDro scale (English) PEDro

This briefly explains why each item has been included in the PEDro scale. More detail on each item is provided in the PEDro scale training program. 1. eligibility criteria were specified Note on administration: This criterion is satisfied if the report describes the source of subjects and a list of criteria used to determine who was eligible to participate in the study. Explanation: This criterion influences external validity, but not the internal or statistical validity of the trial. 2. subjects were randomly allocated to groups (in a crossover study, subjects were randomly allocated an order in which treatments were received) Note on administration: A study is considered to have used random allocation if the report states that allocation was random.

Explanation: Random allocation ensures that (within the constraints provided by chance) treatment and control groups are comparable. 3. allocation was concealed. PEDro-scale (bewerkt door OTSeeker) PRISMA. QUIPS tool (assess risk of bias in prognostic factor studies) STROBE Statement: Available checklists. STROBE checklists Version 4 as published in Oct / Nov 2007!

STROBE Statement: Available checklists

TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) CASP Tools & Checklists. Critical Appraisal Tools - qualitative research (University of South Australia) Critical appraisal is an integral process in Evidence Based Practice. Critical appraisal aims to identify methodological flaws in the literature and provide consumers of research evidence the opportunity to make informed decisions about the quality of research evidence. Below is a list of critical appraisal tools, linked to the websites where they were developed. iCAHE staff will update this webpage as new critical appraisal tools are published.

Healthcare Improvement Scotland have a tutorial on how to best conduct a critical appraisal for those that feel they need a refresher, and the linked YouTube clip gives an introduction to critical appraisal including how to incorpotate evidence into clinical decisions. Please choose a type of study: Randomised Controlled Trials Validation of the PEDro tool: Maher, C. Link to Maher et al. 2003 article (pdf 301KB) ^top.

PDF: EBRO "LITERATUURONDERZOEK" kwal. beoordelen + levels pagina 7. Evidence-Based Practice Research Group. JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research2017. JBI - critical appraisal checklist for narrative, expert opinion and text. Cochrane overzicht onderzoekstypes bijbehorend beoordelingsformulier. Qualitative research review guidelines — RATS.