background preloader

Indian international relations

Facebook Twitter

Mysterious phone call brought nuclear rivals to the brink after Mumbai. A mysterious night-time telephone call brought India and Pakistan, two nuclear armed countries, to the brink of war at the height of the crisis over the Mumbai terror attacks, it was revealed yesterday. According to the Pakistani authorities, a "threatening" call was made by the Indian government, ostensibly from the foreign minister, Pranab Mukherjee, to Pakistan's president, Asif Zardari, on Friday November 28, two days after the drama in Mumbai began. India had by then declared that all the militants who had stormed its commercial capital were from Pakistan. The heated conversation left Zardari believing that India was about to attack his country, reportedly pushing Pakistan's armed forces to high alert.

Given Pakistan's inferiority in conventional forces, analysts believe it could respond with nuclear weapons to an Indian attack. Yesterday Mukherjee lashed out at Pakistan, denying that he had made any such call. NSA’s call to Chinese official for border affairs resolved Ladakh stand-off. Thailand slaps anti-dumping duty on steel imports - Indian Express - Pale Moon. In what could be a blow to Indian steel makers, Thailand has imposed a provisional safeguard duty on import of rolled flat steel products of a certain specification, a major export from India. The move comes close on the heels of the Indonesian government deciding to continue anti-dumping duty against two leading Indian steel firms — JSW Steel and Essar Steel. The 33.11 per cent duty, which has been imposed by Thailand's Department of Foreign Trade (DFT) from February 27, would continue to be in effect till the first week of August.

This is expected to adversely impact the fortunes of India's steel industry. The development, coming after the Indonesian action has the steel ministry worried over the dimming overseas prospects of the domestic steel firms. The duty imposed by Thailand would be in effect against imports from other nations too. The DFT has told the Indian mission that the anti-dumping duty has been imposed in accordance with the provisions of the World Trade Organization. Danielle Rajendram (DRajendram) sur Twitter - Pale Moon... India-Italy marines row: 'No legal immunity' for envoy Daniele Mancini - Pale Moon. 18 March 2013Last updated at 09:16 ET Ambassador Daniele Mancini had given his personal assurance that the marines would return on time India's Supreme Court has said Italy's envoy does not have legal immunity, in an escalating row over Rome's refusal to return two marines charged with murdering two Indian fishermen.

India's Chief Justice Altamas Kabir said the court had "lost trust" in Italy's ambassador Daniele Mancini. The court reiterated last week's order for him not to leave the country. The marines were allowed to go home to vote in last month's polls on condition that they return to stand trial. Mr Mancini had given his personal assurance that the two marines - Massimilian Latorre and Salvatore Girone - would return within four weeks as ruled by the court. There has been no comment from the Italian embassy in Delhi or Ambassador Mancini. But on Friday, Rome said it was seeking a "friendly agreement" with India to resolve the row. 'Mistook for pirates' Continue reading the main story.

China & India. India, Syria bilateral relations: stepping on the gas - The Fina. Last week’s state visit to India by President Bashar al-Assad of Syria denoted more than just an expression of satisfaction with the deepening of mutual ties. The president wants more of the same. Syria, which is experiencing a fall-off in oil exports, and is indebted internally, received investments in 2006 from India to the tune of $84 million out a total of $800 million. That was just $16 million short of China’s $100 million, while Iran topped the list. India, therefore, emerged third highest. Even Germany was fourth-ranked, with $24 million, while the EU as a whole put in $155 million. Even then, India’s investments in Syria have mostly been small-scale ones. India, meanwhile, would like Damascus to open up in the new emerging sectors. New Delhi is also eager to step up trade with Syria. Syria would like stepped-up trade with India since the latter is a major oil importer, and petro-exports account for 50% of the Syrian government’s total revenue takings.

Manmohan Opposes External Intervention in Syria, Urges NAM to Take Lead. Strongly pitching for coordinated global actions against international terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh on asked the Non-Aligned Movement to take a lead in this and also take a stand based on “universally accepted principles” on Syria. Voicing India’s opposition to “external intervention” in Syria, Singh, while addressing the leaders and other representatives from NAM countries who are in Tehran for a two-day summit, made a pointed reference to the situation in the West Asian region, particularly Syria, currently afflicted by a civil war between troops loyal to President Bashar Al-Assad and the rebels.

“The West Asian and North African region is undergoing profound change. As the world’s largest democracy, India supports popular aspirations for a democratic and pluralistic order. Nevertheless, such transformations cannot be prompted by external intervention, which exacerbate the suffering of ordinary citizens. India, Norway sign social security pact.

India and Norway today signed a social security pact that will relieve their workers from double taxation and provide for cooperation in areas of labour market expansion and orderly migration. Nearly 13,000 Indians currently working in diverse sectors including telecom and IT in Norway will benefit from the pact, overseas Indian affairs minister Vayalar Ravi said. The agreement was signed by Ravi and Norway's trade and industries minister Trond Giske in New Delhi. "This is an important milestone in further boosting our relationship with Norway. The pact will enhance movement of people between the two countries," Ravi said. The pact will enhance movement of professionals between the two countries as well as protect workers from double payment of social security contributions, he said.

Noting that trade ties between the two countries have been on the rise, Ravi said Norway has also decided to set up an India Forum in that country to promote bilateral investment. Myanmar - India relations. What are India's Interests in Afghanistan? - by Christine Fair. India's profile in Afghanistan has been a quiet but looming concern for New Delhi, Washington, Brussels and of course Islamabad with all wondering what is the optimal role for India in Afghanistan's reconstruction in light of the enduring security competition between India and Pakistan. On the one hand are those who want to expand India's presence in Afghanistan through increased Indian training of Afghan civilian and military personnel, development projects, and expanded economic ties. These observers are aware of India's long-standing and robust ties with Kabul and Afghans' generally positive public opinion towards Indians and India.

Notably, in late August 2010, Afghanistan's National Security Adviser Rangin Spanta told an Indian journalist, "We would like to expand cooperation with India in order to strengthen Kabul's ability to secure itself. " On the other hand are those that caution against such involvement. India rising Divides the world into three concentric circles. Are India’s nuclear deals going south? Domestic liability laws and international issues may put limits on the country’s ambitious plans to build new reactors By Dan Yurman U.S.

Sec. of State Hillary Clinton meets with India Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna on July 26, 2011. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is in India this week to pressure India to open its nuclear energy markets by changing its domestic supplier liability laws. If she is successful, it would give American vendors hunting licenses to bid for massive nuclear reactor contracts said to be worth $150 billion over the next several decades. In a joint news conference July 20 with Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Under then President George W. Political opposition forces in the Indian parliament, however, saw an opportunity to give Prime Minister Monahan Singh a black eye and imposed a draconian supplier liability law on nuclear energy projects. Clinton was characteristically straightforward in her remarks. Enter the Nuclear Suppliers Group Japan exports at risk? Nuke Notes: Are India's nuclear deals going south?

Domestic liability laws and international issues may be putting limits on the country's ambitious plans to build new reactors Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is in India this week to pressure India to open its nuclear energy markets by changing its domestic supplier liability laws. If she is successful, it would give American vendors hunting licenses to bid for massive nuclear reactor contracts said to be worth $150 billion over the next several decades.

In a joint news conference July 26 with Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna, (right) Clinton said differences over trade and nuclear legislation must be resolved if the benefits of U.S. support for India's civilian nuclear program three years ago is to accrue to U.S. companies. Reaping the rewards of U.S. support for India? Under then President George Bush, the U.S. successfully pushed for India to be allowed to buy uranium for its civil nuclear program. Clinton was characteristically straightforward in her remarks. Polaris » Perceptions, Reality, and U.S.-India Relations. If not even Americans believe their country is the world’s leading economic power today, how can India be expected to work on that assumption? Scanning the vast amounts of Indian commentary in the aftermath of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s visit, the overall reaction appears to have been a…big…collective…yawn. It’s not as if nothing happened. Mrs. As Indrani Bagchi rightly points out, however, we can’t expect a major advance in U.S.

A continuing challenge in the interim is managing expectations, particularly in Washington. This attitude is shortsighted, for it assumes two things. But these assumptions overlook important changes to the international system, hastened by the financial crisis and recession in the United States. Perhaps. Not aware of China dam on Brahmaputra: India. Gaffe diplomatique. Watch out for Russian wild card in Asia-Pacific. JUST before we were tucking into Christmas turkey and plum pudding, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev met his Indian counterpart Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi to reaffirm what the Russian leader called a "privileged partnership" between the two countries.

By contrast, Australia sees little role for Moscow in the future Asian balance of power, where the former superpower was mentioned in passing only twice in the 2009 defence white paper. But other countries are not making the same mistake. If India is the "swing state" in Asia's future balance of power, as a prominent CIA 2005 report put it, New Delhi is well aware that Russia remains the wild card in the region. Medvedev and Singh signed more than 20 agreements ranging from agreements to supply India with natural gas, reaffirming a commitment for a third Indian nuclear power plant to be built by Russian engineers, and the signing of a contract for the joint development of between 250-300 fifth generation fighter aircraft.

India, Russia Sign Agreement to Boost Nuclear Power Building - B. France to build reactors for India. France to build reactors for India France's nuclear giant Areva will construct two nuclear reactors in India by 2020. An Indian state-run nuclear company and a French firm have signed a 9.2-billion-dollar deal for the construction of two nuclear reactors in India by 2020.

Nuclear Power Corporation of India (NPCIL) and France's nuclear group Areva inked a series of contracts for building two 1,650-megawatt reactors in India. The development comes two years after Areva reached an agreement with India on the supply of six European pressurized reactors (EPRs). "India has little experience in the field of civilian nuclear power, which entails a large amount of technical preparation and lengthy negotiations," an Areva engineer said. Until 2008, there was an embargo on sales of civilian nuclear technology to India, but it is now the third country to purchase from Areva, after Finland and China. India currently satisfies 70 percent of its energy needs from coal.