background preloader

African American

Facebook Twitter

The Affordable Care Act is a Historic Opportunity to Advance Health Care Justice for African-Americans. As we celebrate Black History Month and remember the contributions of African-Americans throughout our nation's history, it's important to also focus on the work that still lies ahead to achieve racial justice.

The Affordable Care Act is a Historic Opportunity to Advance Health Care Justice for African-Americans

Decades ago, Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King said, "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane. " Despite the progress we have made, African-Americans and other people of color still struggle daily with unjust, and sometimes deadly, health care inequality. The Affordable Care Act presents a historic opportunity to level this hazardous playing field. African-Americans face many health disparities compared to white non-Hispanics These disparities transcend age and gender. African-Americans are 30 percent more likely than whites to die from heart disease and 2.2 times as likely to die of asthma. African-American-Key-Points. Slavery in America - Black History. My TV provider is not listed.

Slavery in America - Black History

Why not? We are currently working on adding more TV providers. Please check back frequently to see if your TV provider has been added. Why do I need to log in to watch some video content? Viewers who verify their subscription to a TV provider get access to a deeper catalog of video content, including more full episodes. Act Prohibiting the Return of Slaves. The Act Prohibiting the Return of Slaves was a law passed by the United States Congress during the American Civil War forbidding the military to return escaped slaves to their owners.

Act Prohibiting the Return of Slaves

As Union armies entered Southern territory during the early years of the War, emboldened slaves began fleeing behind Union lines to secure their freedom. Some commanders put the slaves to work digging entrenchments, building fortifications, and performing other camp work. Such slaves came to be called "contraband," a term emphasizing their status as captured enemy property. Other Army commanders—particularly Democrats—returned the slaves to their owners. Congress reacted by approving on March 13, 1862 an act prohibiting the military from sending escaped slaves back into slavery. Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves. The Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves of 1807 (2 Stat. 426, enacted March 2, 1807) is a United States federal law that stated that no new slaves were permitted to be imported into the United States.

Act Prohibiting Importation of Slaves

It took effect in 1808, the earliest date permitted by the United States Constitution. Confiscation Act of 1861. The Confiscation Act of 1861 was an act of Congress during the early months of the American Civil War permitting court proceedings for confiscation of any of property being used to support the Confederate independence effort, including slaves.

Confiscation Act of 1861

With respect to slaves, the act authorized court proceedings to strip their owners of any claim to them but did not clarify whether the slaves were free.[2] As a result of this ambiguity, these slaves came under Union lines as property in the care of the U.S. government. In response to this situation, General David Hunter, the Union Army military commander of Georgia, South Carolina, and Florida, issued General Order No. 11 on May 9, 1862 freeing all slaves in areas under his command. Upon hearing of Hunter's action one week later, Lincoln immediately countermanded the order, thus returning the slaves to their former status as property in the care of the federal government.[3]

Kansas–Nebraska Act. This 1856 map shows slave states (gray), free states (pink), U.S. territories (green), and Kansas in center (white).

Kansas–Nebraska Act

The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 (10 Stat. 277) created the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, opening new lands for settlement, and had the effect of repealing the Missouri Compromise of 1820 by allowing white male settlers in those territories to determine through popular sovereignty whether they would allow slavery within each territory. Timeline of the African-American Civil Rights Movement. List of landmark African-American legislation. Congressional Legislation[edit] Bills not passed[edit] Bills signed into law[edit] U.S.

List of landmark African-American legislation

Constitutional Amendments[edit] Federal court and court decisions[edit] Enforcement Acts. The Enforcement Acts were three bills passed by the United States Congress between 1870 and 1871.

Enforcement Acts

They were criminal codes which protected African-Americans’ right to vote, to hold office, to serve on juries, and receive equal protection of laws. Civil Rights Act of 1875. The Civil Rights Act of 1875 (18 Stat. 335-337),[2] sometimes called Enforcement Act or Force Act, was a United States federal law enacted during the Reconstruction Era that guaranteed African Americans equal treatment in public accommodations, public transportation, and prohibited exclusion from jury service.

Civil Rights Act of 1875

The Supreme Court decided the act was unconstitutional in 1883. History of Act[edit] Legislative History[edit] Constitutional Challenge[edit] The Supreme Court of the United States in a nearly unanimous decision declared the act unconstitutional in the Civil Rights Cases (1883) with Justice John Marshall Harlan providing the lone dissent. Civil Rights Act of 1866. The Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27-30, enacted April 9, 1866, is a United States federal law that was mainly intended to protect the civil rights of African-Americans, in the wake of the American Civil War.

Civil Rights Act of 1866

This legislation was enacted by Congress in 1865 but vetoed by President Andrew Johnson. In April 1866 Congress again passed the bill. Although Johnson again vetoed it, a two-thirds majority in each house overcame the veto and the bill ostensibly became law. John Bingham and some other congressmen argued that Congress did not yet have sufficient constitutional power to enact this law.