Commentary on surveillance
As if there wasn't already enough NSA mass surveillanceNSA mass surveillance to worry about, last week we got a peek at the agency's arsenal of tools for exploiting the hardware and software of its targets. NSA revelations: the 'middle ground' everyone should be talking about | Matt Blaze | Comment is free
eye catchers / #JulianAssange on CNN's OutFront (28 Nov 2012) #surveillance #wikileaks #ecuador
Share on Tumblr Mass surveillance of the kind practiced by the NSA produces a chilling effect on journalism, because sources do not feel they can have a private conversation with a reporter. That’s the message of a group of scholars, journalists, and researchers from Columbia Journalism School and the MIT Center for Civic Media, in a public comment to the Review Group on Intelligence and Communication Technologies convened by President Obama. The Effects of Mass Surveillance on Journalism
Media coalition urges better protection of First Amendment rights in NSA, FISA court matters The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, joined by 36 other news media organizations, filed public comments calling on the president’s Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies to more carefully balance the secrecy sometimes required in national security investigations with the public’s right to know what its government is doing.
Why NSA’s Bulk Data Seizures Are Illegal and Unconstitutional » Publications » The Federalist Society Why NSA’s Bulk Data Seizures Are Illegal and Unconstitutional October 21, 2013
The debate continues on Edward Snowden: hero or traitor | Jeff Jarvis | Comment is free Official means of oversight of American and British spying have failed. So we are left with the protection of last resort: the conscience of the individual who will resist abuse of power or expose it once it is done. At the Guardian Activate conference in New York last Wednesday, I moderated a heated panel discussion about the NSA affair with former US Senator Bob Kerrey, a member of the 9/11 Commission; Professor Yochai Benkler, codirector of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard; and journalist Rebecca MacKinnon, a New America fellow.
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden and Barack Obama appear on the front pages of local papers in Hong Kong on 11 June 2013. Photograph: Bobby Yip/Reuters Even though we know governments do all kinds of things I was shocked by the information about the US surveillance operation, Prism. NSA surveillance: The US is behaving like China | Ai Weiwei | Comment is free
'After 9/11 NSA had secret deal with White House'
As has been said, probably rightly, the 19th century did not end until 1914, when the First World War broke out; similarly, the 20th century did not end on New Year's Eve 2000 or New Year's Day 2001, as the calendar would suggest, but continued for another few months. I daresay that the 20th century finally ended only on September 11, 2001, when suicide bombers succeeded in attacking the World Trade Center. Naturally, terrorism had been known for a long time. It was known all too well to 19th-century Europe. It also existed in the 20th century, and in plenty of shades. Farewell to Modernity in the New Age of Surveillance
The Politics of Surveillance: The Erosion of Privacy in Latin America | Rights & Liberties | Scoop.it While most Latin American countries have democratically-elected governments, many still fail to respect human rights, including the right to privacy. Across the region, there have been multiple scandals involving government officials and intelligence agencies engaged in illegal surveillance of communications. These include numerous chilling examples of how interception technologies are being misused to spy on politicians, dissidents, judges, human rights organizations and activists. Although privacy violations vary from country to country, and the full extent of government surveillance in the region remains largely unknown, newly disclosed data gathering programs hint at the architecture of surveillance lying beneath the surface of ostensibly democratic societies. These surveillance systems demonstrate how communication interception is being used as a political tool to identify, control and stifle dissent.