Corporations & Gov Watch

Facebook Twitter

Corporation Ethics...

Confront Corporate Power. Public Citizen Home Page. Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen. Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other.

The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both.

Activist Cash: Profiling activists, organizations & funding. David Brin: THE TRANSPARENT SOCIETY. Our society has one great knack above all others -- one that no other ever managed -- that of holding the mighty accountable.

David Brin: THE TRANSPARENT SOCIETY

Although elites of all kinds enacted laws and customs to hold commonfolk accountable, never before have citizens been so empowered. And history shows that this didn't happen by blinding the mighty -- a futile endeavor that has never worked. It happened by insisting that everybody get to see. By citizens demanding the power to know. I go into this theme at many levels in both fiction and nonfiction. Radical transparency. Radical transparency is a phrase used across fields of governance, politics, software design and business to describe actions and approaches that radically increase the openness of organizational process and data.

Radical transparency

Its usage was originally understood as an approach or act that uses abundant networked information to access previously confidential organizational process or outcome data.[1][2] History and Uses[edit] Radical Transparency Contexts[edit] Radical Corporate Transparency[edit] Radical corporate transparency, as a philosophical concept, would involve removing all barriers to free and easy public access to corporate, political and personal (treating persons as corporations) information and the development of laws, rules, social connivance and processes that facilitate and protect such an outcome.[6] Using these methods to 'hold corporations accountable for the benefit of everyone' was emphasised in Tapscott and Ticoll's book "The Naked Corporation"[7] in 2003.

Sociétés & gouv vigilance fr...

Corporate social responsibility. The term "corporate social responsibility" became popular in the 1960s and has remained a term used indiscriminately by many to cover legal and moral responsibility more narrowly construed.

Corporate social responsibility

Proponents argue that corporations increase long term profits by operating with a CSR perspective, while critics argue that CSR distracts from business' economic role. A 2000 study compared existing econometric studies of the relationship between social and financial performance, concluding that the contradictory results of previous studies reporting positive, negative, and neutral financial impact, were due to flawed empirical analysis and claimed when the study is properly specified, CSR has a neutral impact on financial outcomes.[5] Critics[6][7] questioned the "lofty" and sometimes "unrealistic expectations" in CSR.[8] or that CSR is merely window-dressing, or an attempt to pre-empt the role of governments as a watchdog over powerful multinational corporations. Knowmore.org - Question Your Goods. Vote With Your Wallet. The radical transparency of DAVID BRIN.

The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?

the radical transparency of DAVID BRIN

Was published in May 1998 by Perseus Press (formerly Addison Wesley). Global Witness. The 14 Characteristics of Fascism, by Lawrence Britt, Spring 2003. The F Scale: Final form. Fifty years ago, the Authoritarian Personality studies attempted to "construct an instrument that would yield an estimate of fascist receptivity at the personality level.

The F Scale: Final form

" This online, interactive F Scale presents that instrument in its final form. Additional infomation, including an explanation of the personality variables the F Scale tries to measure, is given below after the questionnaire. So take the F Scale now --- or else! And if you want a good definition of fascism (something that somehow eluded the authors of the Authoritarian Personality studies), check out Fascism: The Ultimate Definition.

Governments Watch

Relations & Connections. The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us To Choose Between Privacy ... - David Brin - Google Books. Introducing the Cycle of Transparency. Government transparency is that rarest of political phenomena -- a great idea with support across the political spectrum and popularity among the public.

Introducing the Cycle of Transparency

Yet, here we are in the 21st century with every tool we would need to make government more transparent and accountable, and still we are operating with a government that often behaves as it did in the 19th century. So, transparent government is a good thing, but we do not yet have one. Now what? It's clear that there is a breakdown between conceptual support for the idea of government transparency and enacting the changes necessary to make it so. There is fear and resistance to change inside government that requires cultural, political, and attitude adjustments.

For many, the concept of transparency still simply feels too vague to get behind in a meaningful way. We've grappled with these challenges at Sunlight since our founding four years ago, and have been thinking about it with increased urgency over the last year in particular. NNDB: Tracking the entire world.

Peter Eigen: How to expose the corrupt.

Corporations Monitoring...

Corporate psychopathy... Corporations Watch... Consumer networks. Category:Consumer rights activists. Inequality watch. Center for Consumer Freedom. Transparency International - the global coalition against corruption.