23 incredible new technologies you’ll see by 2021. Science Fiction - A Nerd’s Guide to Reading. Build a Touchless 3D Tracking Interface with Everyday Materials. Combine low-tech materials with some high-tech components and build a completely Touchless 3D Tracking Interface. Explore capacitive sensing by using several panels of cardboard lined with aluminum foil. These panels, when charged, create electric fields that correspond to X, Y, and Z axes to create a 3D cube. With the aid of an Arduino microcontroller and some supplied code, movements inside the cube are tracked as your hand moves around inside the field. For Weekend Projects makers looking for an introduction to Arduino, this is a great project to learn from. Once your touchless 3D tracker is up and running, what you do with it is only limited by your own imagination!
Make an RGB or HSB color pickerControl video or music parameters; sequence a beat or melodyLarge, slightly bent surface with multiple plates + a projector = “Minority Report” interface More: See all of the Weekend Projects posts Related. Japanese Scientists Create Touchable Holograms. To Our Faithful Current.com Users: Current's run has ended after eight exciting years on air and online. The Current TV staff has appreciated your interest, support, participation and unflagging loyalty over the years. Your contributions helped make Current.com a vibrant place for discussing thousands of interesting stories, and your continued viewership motivated us to keep innovating and find new ways to reflect the voice of the people.
We now welcome the on-air and digital presence of Al Jazeera America, a new news network committed to reporting on and investigating real stories affecting the lives of everyday Americans in every corner of the country. You can keep up with what's new on Al Jazeera America and see this new brand of journalism for yourself at Thank you for inspiring and challenging us. . – The Current TV Staff. Circuit board table. Sea Thing | Flash MX open source.
Paint Moss Graffiti - Step-by-Step Guides for Offbeat DIY Projects. Which Naturals Are Backed By Serious Science? - Lifestyle. Symphony of Science. InnerHi. Amazing Trick. Third-World Wind Power: First Look. Explanation: How Brain Training Can Make You Significantly Smarter. Contact lenses will project images directly onto your eyeballs. Rosenhan experiment. Experiment to determine the validity of psychiatric diagnosis As a critique of psychiatric diagnosis, it broached the topic of wrongful involuntary commitment.[3] The experiment is said to have "accelerated the movement to reform mental institutions and to deinstitutionalize as many mental patients as possible".[4] Rosenhan claimed that he, along with eight other people (five men and three women), entered 12 hospitals in five states on both coasts of the US.
Three of the participants were admitted for only a brief period of time, and in order to obtain sufficient documented experiences, they re-applied to additional institutions. Respondents defended psychiatry against the experiment's conclusions, saying that as psychiatric diagnosis relies largely on the patient's report of their experiences, faking their presence no more demonstrates problems with psychiatric diagnosis than lying about other medical symptoms.[5] Pseudopatient experiment [edit] While listening to a lecture by Ronald D. Depressive realism. Evidence for[edit] Evidence against[edit] When asked to rate both their performance and the performance of another, non-depressed individuals demonstrated positive bias when rating themselves but no bias when rating others.
Criticism of the evidence[edit] Some have argued that the evidence is not more conclusive because there is no standard for "reality," the diagnoses are dubious, and the results may not apply to the real world.[33] Because many studies rely on self-report of depressive symptoms, the diagnosis of depression in these studies may not be valid as self-reports are known to often be biased, necessitating the use of other objective measures. Due to most of these studies using designs that do not necessarily approximate real-world phenomena, the external validity of the depressive realism hypothesis is unclear. See also[edit] References[edit] Jump up ^ Alloy,L.B., Abramson,L.Y. (1988).
Further reading[edit] Rachel Adelson (April 2005). The year 2000 as envisioned in the year 1910. The Story of Stuff. Liquid Wood: 100% Organic Replacement For Everything Plastic - Green Diary. Now that we know how harmful plastic is to the environment, we are starting to look for workable alternatives. Nevertheless, there seems to be no way out. Plastic is everywhere. It isn’t just inside our homes, it is inside our bodies as well. Moreover, even the remotest places of the planet earth like deep-sea trenches aren’t safe from it. Liquid Wood German inventors have developed a new material which holds the promise of replacing everything plastic with something as natural as wood.
Arboform or liquid wood can be molded into any object form which is normally made using non-biodegradable petroleum products. Via: Dornob Is Eco-friendly plastic the answer to plastic pollution Now, due to increasing awareness of plastic pollution, there has been a conscious effort by researchers and scientists to develop plastics like liquid wood which are less harmful to the environment. What is Eco-friendly plastic Eco-friendly plastic is usually derived from plants’ byproduct. Aircarbon Believe your eyes. Nano. Distances from the Sun.
Solar System Visualizer. Earth and Moon Viewer: Expert Request. View from Satellite. Spectacular images of other galaxies as viewed by Hubble. Hubble: Where is the center of the Universe? When astronomers look at distant galaxies to determine how fast they're moving, it looks like they're all moving away from us.
Does that mean we're at the center of the universe? Well, no. It turns out that every point in the universe sees itself as the center! You can show yourself why with this activity. Try this! - The picture on this page has two layers-- the bottom layer represents the universe a billion years ago. . - Use your mouse to drag the top (blue circle) layer randomly over the bottom one, the difference between the two is hard to see. . - Now choose a different dot on the top layer and line it up with its corresponding dot on the bottom layer.
What's going on? The top layer (the universe today) was made by enlarging the bottom layer (the universe 1 billion years ago) by 5% percent. Space Shuttle Discovery - 360VR Images. The Scale of the Universe 2. Prepare for Data Tsunami, Warns Google CEO - PCWorld. August 05, 2010, 12:21 PM — Google CEO Eric Schmidt had some scary things to say about privacy yesterday. In a nutshell, he said there's an almost incomprehensible amount of data out there about all of us -- much of which we've generated ourselves via social networks, blogs, and so on -- and we are totally unprepared to deal with the implications of that fact. Schmidt was speaking at the Techonomy confab, currently underway at California's Lake Tahoe, where large-brained people gather to talk about how technology and the economy intersect. [ See also: Whom do you fear: Apple, Google, Microsoft, or God?
] "There was 5 exabytes of information created between the dawn of civilization through 2003," Schmidt said, "but that much information is now created every 2 days, and the pace is increasing...People aren't ready for the technology revolution that's going to happen to them.... " Are visions of 2001's HAL 9000 or maybe The Terminator's SkyNet dancing in your head yet? This Will Mindfuck You: The Double-Slit Experiment. The video below shows scientific proof that there is something NOT quite logical or scientific about this universe. The mere act of observation can completely change the outcome of an event! Before I get too ahead of myself, you need to watch the video below to understand: (Forgive the corny cartoon character explaining the concept — at least he knows his stuff) Recap: When a camera observed the electrons, they acted as particles.
However, when the no equipment was used to observe the electrons, they acted as waves and particles simultaneously. So what’s the reason for this? Does the electron somehow know that it is being watched? Want even further proof? Then in 2002, a group of researchers set up the experiment in a way that the electron could not possibly receive information about the existence of an observing instrument. The Results: The photons acted like particles 93% of the time that they were observed. What are the implications of this?
1. 2. 3.