Lecture Series - Mr. Vladimir Kopal. Malum in se. Malum in se (plural mala in se) is a Latin phrase meaning wrong or evil in itself.
The phrase is used to refer to conduct assessed as sinful or inherently wrong by nature, independent of regulations governing the conduct. It is distinguished from malum prohibitum, which is wrong only because it is prohibited. For example, most human beings believe that murder, rape, and theft are wrong, regardless of whether a law governs such conduct or where the conduct occurs, and is thus recognizably malum in se. Opinio Juris.
DOD or CIA in Yemen? The Wall Street Journal national security reporting team, followed closely by the Washington Post and the AP, have been reporting in the last couple of days on the CIA being tasked to carry out an expanded Predator drone targeted killing program in Yemen.
I’ve been meaning to blog on this, following on Deborah’s post below discussing the AP story, but meanwhile Robert Chesney poses the following question over at the Lawfare blog (where you can find links to these articles and an expanded discussion): [W]hat really struck me about the stories was their common reference to a particular legal argument. Here is Siobhan Gorman and Adam Entous in the Wall Street Journal:The U.S. military strikes have been conducted with the permission of the Yemeni government. The Yale Law Journal Online - The Yale Law Journal. Academic Law Journals and Law Reviews - FindLaw for Law Students. Yale Law School. Yale Law School Sculptural Ornamentation. Harvard Law School. Because the Past is the Present, and the Future too.
By Kenneth W.
Mack Kenneth W. Mack is a professor at Harvard Law School HNN Roundtable: Do Democrats Have a Double Standard for Obama? Are liberal Democrats compromising their principles by supporting President Obama, despite the centrist positions he has taken on some partisan issues? Stanford Law School. Law Professors Urge Congress to Reject PROTECT-IP Act. Letter asking Congress to reject the PROTECT-IP bill (PDF) Over 100 professors who teach and write about intellectual property, Internet law, innovation, and the First Amendment are urging the members of Congress to reject the PROTECT-IP Act of 2011 (S. 968).
The bill would give the government sweeping authority to take websites offline, remove websites from search engines, and bring infringement claims against Internet publishers. International blogs. Law. United Nations Rule of Law. JURIST - Legal News and Research. Egypt declares Muslim Brotherhood legal for first time. UK court allows Kenya citizens to sue UK government for torture. Legal News, Technology, In-House Counsel, & Small Firms Legal Resources. FindLaw for Legal Professionals. Man Buys $330,000 Home For $16, Becomes Least Popular Person In The Neighborhood [VIDEO] Adverse possession. Adverse Possession and Prescriptive Easements.
Trespass, Adverse Possession and Prescriptive Easements Man, like a tree in the cleft of a rock, gradually shapes his roots to his surroundings, and when the roots have grown to a certain size, can't be displaced without cutting at his life. -- Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes People have the right to keep unwanted intruders off their property.
They do this all the time, sometimes with fences or with signs, sometimes just by asking trespassers to please stay away. In cases of serious, repeated annoyance or threatened harm, landowners can call the police. They will usually warn the person to stay away and, if necessary, make an arrest. Adverse Possession in New York State - Lawyers.com Community. It reads to me like you are doing exactly the wrong things!
The deed attachment probably serves as notice of the adverse use time clock having a definite starting time--and once it times out you are dead meat. The way I understand some of the case law elsewhere--once you become aware of the adverse use or should have been aware then there is no question of the time clock running against you. Your post makes no sesne--if the home is on you lands --how do you accurately fence your lands? Your survey is not accurate until som ecourt agres it is accurate--and you need to use a surveyor with considerable court experience--because you better get there!
New York Enacts Changes to Adverse Possession Law to Require Claim of Right « LAW OF THE LAND. Following a 2007 veto of S.5364-A/A.9156 (veto #153)by Governor Spitzer, this week Governor David Patterson signed S.7915-C/A.11574-A changing the statutory standard for adverse possession in New York.
According to the Sponsor’s Memorandum in support of the bill (Senator Elizabeth O’C. Little), the Legislation was offered in reaction to recent case law on adverse possession by the New York Court of Appeals (Walling v. Przvbvlo, 7N.Y.3d 228 (2006)) and an appellate court (Robinson v Robinson, 34 AD.3d 975, 825 N.Y.S.2d 277(3d dept – 2006). No. S00A1459. - PROCTOR v. HEIRS OF JERNIGAN - GA Supreme Court. PROCTOR et al. v.
HEIRS OF Susie JERNIGAN et al. No. S00A1459. -- October 23, 2000 John W. Jus post bellum. Jus post bellum (Latin for "Justice after war") deals with the termination phase of war.
The idea was written about by Brian Orend to reflect the need for rules to end wars completely and fairly. Purpose[edit] Provide assurances to combatants about the terms necessary to end a conflictProvide terms for the end of war; once the rights of a political community have been vindicated, further continuation of war becomes an act of aggressionProvide guidelines for the construction of peace treatiesPrevent continuous fighting throughout peace negotiations by belligerents trying to gain more favorable terms.Prevent draconian and vengeful peace terms; the rights a just state fights for in a war provide the constraints on what can be demanded from the defeated belligerent Just Settlement of a Just War[edit]