Many states have passed National Defense Authorization Act Nullification or are currently looking at legislation to do so to some extent or another. However, in the heart of the tyrannical state of New York, the city of Albany has introduced their own NDAA resolution that will not only nullify the federal NDAA and not support it with state resources, but will actively call upon law enforcement to stand between citizens and federal officials and the U.S. military. Now that’s a resolution with some teeth in it! From our friends at People Against the NDAA (PANDA): In an effort to restore the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights, 11th Ward Councilman Anton Konev of the Albany, NY Common Council, has introduced Resolution 80.92.13, the strongest resolution in the nation, designed to protect Albany’s citizens from any application of sections 1021 and 1022 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), or the Law of War in the City of Albany. Albany NY NDAA Resolution Introduced That Will Use Force Against Feds … By Tim Brown | Save America Foundation Albany NY NDAA Resolution Introduced That Will Use Force Against Feds … By Tim Brown | Save America Foundation
The Last Chance to Stop the NDAA The Supreme Court building. (Photo: Mark Fischer)I and my fellow plaintiffs have begun the third and final round of our battle to get the courts to strike down a section of theNational Defense Authorization Act(NDAA) that permits the military to seize U.S. citizens, strip them of due process and hold them indefinitely in military facilities. Carl Mayer and Bruce Afran, the lawyers who with me in January 2012 brought a lawsuit against President Barack Obama (Hedges v. Obama), are about to file papers asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear our appeal of a 2013 ruling on the act’s Section 1021. “First the terrorism-industrial complex assured Americans that they were only spying on foreigners, not U.S. citizens,” Mayer said to me recently. The Last Chance to Stop the NDAA
December 14th, 2013 Reading the mainstream (official) press, one would believe that the NDAA is nothing more nefarious than a necessary replenishing of Pentagon funds. Readers of The New American know, however, there is much more than budget issues contained in the legislation. For two years, the NDAA included provisions that purported to authorize the president of the United States to deploy the U.S. military to apprehend and indefinitely detain any person (including an American citizen) who he believes “represent[s] an enduring security threat to the United States.” Such an immense grant of power is not only unconscionable, but unconstitutional, as well. Congress Rushing to Approve 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) Congress Rushing to Approve 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Amazon Drones: Orwellian Mayhem? | Mark Weinstein President Obama's proposed 2014 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) calls for a general ban on drone attacks on American citizens. On the December 1st telecast of 60 Minutes, Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos unveiled his grand vision for drone attacks on our porches and personal spaces. From a warehouse to your front door, goods delivered in record time with minimal hassle. What could possibly go wrong with that? Pretty much everything and here's why. First, consider the practical implications. Amazon Drones: Orwellian Mayhem? | Mark Weinstein
Guantanamo Cuba Prison NDAA

100 Million Patriots Standing REX 84: FEMA'S BLUEPRINT FOR MARTIAL LAW IN AMERICA The article that Jon was referring to: We are dangerously close to a situation where ~ if the American people took to the streets in righteous indignation or if there were another 9/11 ~ a mechanism for martial law could be quickly implemented and carried out under REX 84. The Cheney/Bush administration has a plan which would accommodate the detention of large numbers of American citizens during times of emergency. The plan is called REX 84, short for Readiness Exercise 1984. Through Rex-84 an undisclosed number of concentration camps were set in operation throughout the United States, for internment of dissidents and others potentially harmful to the state. The Rex 84 Program was originally established on the reasoning that if a “mass exodus” of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they would be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA. 100 Million Patriots Standing
REX84

warmonger

Pro First I would like to thank my opponent for accepting this debate. I hope this debate will shed light on some topics that hopefully effect people's views. Topic: Should Obama be impeached for NDAA and Benghazi cover-up? Topic: Should Obama be impeached for NDAA and Benghazi cover-up?
Blackout - News & Views Blackout - News & Views On the cover of the most recent book produced by Project Censored is a photo of protesting college students in California getting pepper sprayed by a cop. The shot is framed in such a way that much of the focus is on the spectators holding their cell phone cameras up to capture images of the assault. In a way, the picture captures something essential about Project Censored: the idea that journalism can be pried from the grip of corporate media and democratized. That philosophy has driven the project since its launch at California's Sonoma State University in 1976. In the years since then, the nonprofit effort has grown to include contributors from around the world who submit stories they believe have been "underreported, ignored, misrepresented, or censored by the U.S. corporate media," as the project's website words it.
Sen. Ayotte praised for helping keep taxpayer money from the Taliban | New Hampshire NEWS06
Fighting Back Against the NDAA - Los Angeles LA Fighting Back Against the NDAA - Los Angeles LA By Michael Webster: Syndicated Investigative Reporter. Nov 7, 2012 at 5:00 PM PDT The President signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) under the radar late on New Years Eve of 2011. The new law takes away American basic constitutional rights. The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution states that the government may not take the life, liberty or property of any person without due process.
State lawmakers in Texas are fighting to reassert their citizens’ Fourth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment rights. Republican legislators have submitted two bills, one to remove the indefinite detention provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), and the other to stop the intrusive screening procedures of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). HB149, the Texas Liberty Preservation Act filed by state Rep. Lyle Larson, targets the most controversial provisions of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act. Texas Bills Would Nullify NDAA's Indefinite Detention, TSA's Intrusive Screening Texas Bills Would Nullify NDAA's Indefinite Detention, TSA's Intrusive Screening
Rand Paul single-handedly tries to stop NDAA Rand Paul single-handedly tries to stop NDAA Government Is Not The Tool To Change Society Lobotomies — Past, Present and Future — How the VA Treats Its Soldiers Student Suspended For Asking Questions About Gun Control
Ron Paul - Rise For Liberty - Stop CISPA, NDAA, Patriot Act, TSA
Eric BlairActivist Post By now anyone who pays attention to politics knows that the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2012 contained a provision that allows for the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without charge or trial. Section 1021 of the 2012 NDAA states that anyone suspected of being involved in terrorism or “belligerent acts” against the U.S. can be detained by the military under the so-called Authorization for Use of Military Force, including American citizens. In other words, the war on terror has been officially declared on U.S. soil and everyone is now considered a potential combatant in this war. Senator Lindsey Graham pretty much summed it up when he said, "The homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be held without trial whether an American citizen or not." NDAA 2013: Let's Identify The Traitors to The US Constitution
People Of America BEWARE!! National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
NDAA Equipment PO#

Tuesday, 03 April 2012 11:42 Written by Jeff Henry I have rarely been as concerned for the future of freedom and our Constitution as I have been since the passage last December of S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2012. I have rarely felt more frustrated with a politician than I am with Colorado Senator Michael Bennet (D) for responding to concerns about NDAA with nothing but disinformation and silence. People with expertise in this area have voiced grave concerns about provisions of NDAA, particularly in Section 1031, which allow the government to arrest and indefinitely detain U.S. citizens without charge or due process based on mere suspicions about their support for terrorism or terrorist organizations. Concerns about provisions so antithetical to the Constitution would be warranted any time. Colorado Senator Bennet Refuses to Answer Questions About the NDAA | Light from the Right
Message Boards - "WTH is THIS?!?????! (CSPAN Footage: Bill HR8791 - Bill S1867 and the NDAA)" - NSBR Board - Two Peas In A Bucket
Coalition Urges President to Veto NDAA If It Extends Guantánamo Transfer Restrictions November 27, 2012 Human Rights, Religious, and Civil Liberties Groups Ask Obama to Keep His Promise to Close Guantánamo Prison FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: (212) 549-2666; media@aclu.org
ndaa weapons cocked ready

The Politics Of Crime Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) today introduced an Amendment to the NDAA that would ban indefinite detention of U.S. citizens. The language of the amendment assures that no authorization to use military force, war declaration or any similar authority would allow an American apprehended in the United States to be held without charge or trial. Co-sponsors include Senators Paul (R-Ky.), Coons (D-Del.), Collins (R-Maine), Lautenberg (D-N.J.), Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Kirk (D-Ill.), Tester (D-Mont.), Johnson (D-S.D.), Sanders (I-Vt.), Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Baucus (D-Mont.) and Heller (R-Nev.) The 668 page NDAA bill for 2013 is S. 3254, available here.
Opponents of the post-9/11 use of indefinite military detention have filed an emergency motion with the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to block a law they say allows innocent American citizens to be locked away without trial. The motion, submitted on Wednesday, asks the Supreme Court to reinstate an injunction against a key portion of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012. Unless the court does so, the motion argues, Americans are "in actual and imminent danger of losing their core First Amendment rights and fundamental Equal Protection liberties." NDAA Indefinite Detention Opponents File Supreme Court Emergency Motion
Administration Statement of Policy on Senate NDAA Bill
NDAA 2013: White House and Senate fight over indefinite detention
Critics contend ‘Feinstein Amendment’ cannot adequately protect due process - Tampa Bay Libertarian
A Response to Senator Lee on Indefinite Detention
The Codification of Tyranny: US Government Can Still “Black Bag” Any American
Feinstein amendment doubles down on NDAA's assault on constitutional rights
Michigan Bars NDAA Indefinite Detention
NDAA Double Cross
Cutting Through the Controversy About Indefinite Detention and the NDAA
Op-Ed: Obama appeals decision to block indefinite detention power
Bill S-1867, NDAA, Sections 1031 & 1032 – Back in the News | Independent Sentinel
Judge Blocks Portion of NDAA
NDAA Ruling
NDAA Is Declared Null & Void: U.S. Federal Judge To Treasonists Obama & McCain’s Citizen Detention Scheme ~ I Said NO!
Patriot or Threat to National Security | Asset Protection Planning
NDAA and the Constitution.
Historic NDAA Battle Underway: TV Networks Silent
NDAA Contitutionality Currently Being Challenged in Washington Amid Total MSM News Blackout on Critical Constitutional Issue of Imprisonment without Charges or Trial (August 11, 2012)
Fight Over NDAA's Police-State Provisions Continues in Court
NDAA Obama

The Freedom 7 Are Beating Obama in Court by Kelley B. Vlahos
America, the battlefield
National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) - IO
Reemployment of Retirees: Six Agencies' Use of Dual Compensation Waiver Authority is Limited
Patriot Award: Denisa Jashari
DAVID SEAMAN: The End Of America As We Know It?
A Slick Trick on the NDAA and Indefinite Detention; Don't Be Fooled!
Rick Allen on 2012 NDAA
The spectacle of democracy in the US
NDAA | National Defense Authorization Act | Lawsuit Against NDAA
Corporate Media Silent On Lawuit Over NDAA Being Used To Silence Journalists :
Daniel Ellsberg and NDAA and detention
The Libertarian Patriot: TLP Quik Hits: NDAA Nullification Passes Arizona House Committee
Tea Party, Occupy March Against NDAA | War on Terror
Nullification vs NDAA, Drones and more. Tenther News 07-31-12
The US Government's Judicial Assault on Fundamental Political Rights
Obama fights ban on indefinite detention of Americans
NDAA Suit Argued In Federal Court Yesterday - New York - News - Runnin' Scared
Obama not happy that Judge has ruled against him on NDAA detention provision - 24 Hour Patriots ... we never sleep!
Tangerine Bolen ~ US Attorneys Refuse To Assure Judge That They Are Not Already Detaining Citizens Under NDAA | Shift Frequency
National Defense Authorization Act defies Constitutional right of habeas corpus
Barack Obama’s performance on civil liberties called a ‘disaster’
After Latest NDAA Challenge Hearing, Thoughts on the Criminalization of Dissent
Stop the NDAA!
Kucinich: NDAA Authorizes War Against Iran
Contribute now to help us beat indefinite detention
Anonymous attacking creators of indefinite detention bill
Udall wants to undo indefinite detention | IndyBlog
Video: Former NSA official admits gov't collects most U.S. emails
Getting Iranian Oil Sanctions Right
Naomi Wolf: Four Alarm Alert -- Red Flashing
The End Of America As We Know It?
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
Space export control reform: the different schools of thought and a proposed way forward
Senate Debate on FY2012 Defense Authorization Act: Excerpts on Detention, Interrogation
Satellite Industry Association Applauds Administration's Interim Assessment of Satellite Export Control Policy
Satellite Industry Association (SIA)... Regulation Reformation (SatCom
Full Text of H.R. 2647 (111th): National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
Bill Text - 112th Congress (2011-2012
National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2012 | Capitol Words
US Congress: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 - 7-23-09
P.L. 111-84, The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010
National Defense Authorization Act For Fiscal Year 2010 Public | PDF Search Engine
Space Politics » Export control reform followup