background preloader

Climate change

Facebook Twitter

Christine Stewart (Former Canadian Minister of the Environment) said:
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.

Timothy Wirth (President, UN Foundation) and former official of the Clinton Administration said,
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”

Paul Watson (Co-Founder of Green Peace) said,
“It doesn’t matter what is true. It only matters what people believe is true.” Climate Change in 12 Minutes - The Skeptic's Case.

Scott and Shackleton logbooks prove Antarctic sea ice is not shrinking 100 years after expeditions. CFACT Climate Truth File 2016. 'Global Warming' is a Crock of Sht. The Climate Change Scam, What its REALLY all about The David Icke Videocast. Antarctica gaining more ice than losing – NASA. Antarctica has been accumulating more ice than it’s been losing in recent decades, a new study by NASA has revealed, challenging existing theories on climate change and rises in sea levels.

Antarctica gaining more ice than losing – NASA

The paper, entitled “Mass gains of the Antarctic ice sheet exceed losses,” was published in the Journal of Glaciology on Friday. The authors of the study, who are from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, the University of Maryland and Sigma Space Corporation, analyzed satellite data showing that Antarctica gained 112 billion tons of ice annually from 1992 to 2001. There was a slowdown in accumulation from 2003 to 2008, but gains still stood at solid 82 billion tons of ice per year during that period, the paper said. Lead author and NASA glaciologist Jay Zwally stressed that the results don’t mean that Antarctica will continue gain ice perpetually, as the trend could reverse in just a couple of decades. Read more “But this is also bad news,” he stressed. Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses. From the Arctic to the Mojave Desert, terrestrial and marine habitats are rapidly changing.

These changes impact animals that are adapted to specific ecological niches, sometimes displacing them or reducing their numbers. From their privileged vantage point, satellites are particularly well-suited to observe habitat transformation and help scientists forecast impacts on the distribution, abundance and migration of animals. In a press conference Monday at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco, three researchers discussed how detailed satellite observations have facilitated ecological studies of change over time.

The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change. Climate Change, the Pope, and World Government. Scientists balk at ‘hottest year’ claims: Ignores Satellites showing 18 Year ‘Pause’ – ‘We are arguing over the significance of hundredths of a degree’ – The ‘Pause’ continues. White Earth Effect. Copyright January 7th, 2013 All Rights Reserved.

White Earth Effect

Why Everyone is Wrong about Climate Change. Tony CartalucciLocalOrg July 2, 2014 Assigning blame for climate change that will happen with or without human activity on Earth constitutes a disingenuous discourse.

Why Everyone is Wrong about Climate Change

The climate changes, and nearly everything on Earth and beyond it effects that change. From geological processes to biological evolution, to changes in the sun’s output, to yes, even human activity – absolutely everything has an impact on the climate for better or for worse. The climate has been in a constant, linear state of change, long before human beings evolved, and even throughout the relatively short period of time humans have inhabited the Earth.


Doomsday Arctic Ice Sheet Propaganda. Transcript for S0's Video: "They Want to Blame You - (A21CS Section 1.2)" - Suspicious0bserversCollective. Global warming debunked: NASA. Ethan A.

global warming debunked: NASA

HuffNatural News May 22, 2013 Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA’s Langley Research Center. NASA funded report. Solar Storm Dumps Gigawatts into Earth's Upper Atmosphere March 22, 2012: A recent flurry of eruptions on the sun did more than spark pretty auroras around the poles.

NASA funded report

NASA-funded researchers say the solar storms of March 8th through 10th dumped enough energy in Earth’s upper atmosphere to power every residence in New York City for two years. “This was the biggest dose of heat we’ve received from a solar storm since 2005,” says Martin Mlynczak of NASA Langley Research Center. “It was a big event, and shows how solar activity can directly affect our planet.” Mlynczak is the associate principal investigator for the SABER instrument onboard NASA’s TIMED satellite.

Al Gore Set To Become First “Carbon Billionaire” CO2 tax agenda front man lining his pockets on the back of global warming fearmongering Paul Joseph WatsonPrison Tuesday, November 3, 2009 The New York Times has lifted the lid on how Al Gore stands to benefit to the tune of billions of dollars if the carbon tax proposals he is pushing come to fruition in the United States, while documenting how he has already lined his pockets on the back of exaggerated fearmongering about global warming.

Al Gore Set To Become First “Carbon Billionaire”

As is to be expected, the article is largely a whitewash and takes an apologist stance in defense of Gore. However, the NY Times‘ John M. Map: The Climate Change Scare Machine — the perpetual self-feeding cycle of alarm. Two professors of sociology think they can explain why “Climate Deniers” are winning.

Map: The Climate Change Scare Machine — the perpetual self-feeding cycle of alarm

But Riley E. Dunlap and Aaron M. McCright start from the wrong assumption and miss the bleeding obvious: the theory was wrong, the evidence has changed, and thousands of volunteers have exposed it. The real question sociologists will be studying for years to come is: how was an exaggerated scare, based on so little evidence, poor reasoning and petty namecalling, kept alive for two whole decades?

Non-scientific method

Countering climate sceptics.