background preloader

Managing Systemic Change

Facebook Twitter

Viable system model. Overview[edit] The model was developed by operations research theorist and cybernetician Stafford Beer in his book Brain of the Firm (1972).[1] Together with Beer's earlier works on cybernetics applied to management, this book effectively founded management cybernetics. The first thing to note about the cybernetic theory of organizations encapsulated in the VSM is that viable systems are recursive; viable systems contain viable systems that can be modeled using an identical cybernetic description as the higher (and lower) level systems in the containment hierarchy (Beer expresses this property of viable systems as cybernetic isomorphism).

A development of this model has originated the theoretical proposal called Viable systems approach. Components of the viable system model[edit] Here we give a brief introduction to the cybernetic description of the organization encapsulated in a single level of the VSM.[2] Principal functions of the VSM Rules for the viable system[edit] These principles are: Wicked problem. "Wicked problem" is a phrase originally used in social planning to describe a problem that is difficult or impossible to solve because of incomplete, contradictory, and changing requirements that are often difficult to recognize.

The term "wicked" is used to denote resistance to resolution, rather than evil.[1] Moreover, because of complex interdependencies, the effort to solve one aspect of a wicked problem may reveal or create other problems. C. West Churchman introduced the concept of wicked problems in a "Guest Editorial" of Management Science (Vol. 14, No. 4, December 1967) by referring to "a recent seminar" by Professor Horst Rittel, and discussing the moral responsibility of operations research "to inform the manager in what respect our 'solutions' have failed to tame his wicked problems". Horst Rittel and Melvin M.

Characteristics[edit] Rittel and Webber's 1973 formulation of wicked problems in social policy planning specified ten characteristics:[2][3] Examples[edit] Authoritative. Wicked Problems. If you work in an organisation that deals with social, commercial or financial planning - or any type of public policy planning - then you've got wicked problems. You may not call them by this name, but you know what they are.

They are those complex, ever changing societal and organisational planning problems that you haven't been able to treat with much success, because they won't keep still. They're messy, devious, and they fight back when you try to deal with them. This paper describes the notion of wicked problems (WPs) as put forward by Rittel & Webber in their landmark article "Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning" (1973). It presents the ten criteria they use to characterise WPS, and describes how General Morphological Analysis (GMA) can be used to model and analyse such problem complexes.

Keywords: Wicked problems, general morphological analysis, policy analysis, Horst Rittel Introduction At first glance, it is not self-evident what is actually meant by this term. 1. 2. 3. 4. Dunning–Kruger effect. In the field of psychology, the Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which people of low ability have illusory superiority and mistakenly assess their cognitive ability as greater than it is. The cognitive bias of illusory superiority comes from the inability of low-ability people to recognize their lack of ability; without the self-awareness of metacognition, low-ability people cannot objectively evaluate their actual competence or incompetence.[1] On the other hand, people of high ability incorrectly assume that tasks that are easy for them are also easy for other people.

[better source needed][2] Original study[edit] In Self-insight: Roadblocks and Detours on the Path to Knowing Thyself (2005), Dunning described the Dunning–Kruger effect as "the anosognosia of everyday life", referring to a neurological condition in which a disabled person either denies or seems unaware of his or her disability. He stated: "If you're incompetent, you can't know you're incompetent ... Systems Thinking and Lean: Complementary or Competitive Approaches?

Open University - Systems | Useful Links. Primer [ProjectsISSS] General Systems Theory by Ludwig von Bertalanffy “Modern science is characterized by its ever-increasing specialization, necessitated by the enormous amount of data, the complexity of techniques and of theoretical structures within every field. Thus science is split into innumerable disciplines continually generating new subdisciplines. In consequence, the physicist, the biologist, the psychologist and the social scientist are, so to speak, encapusulated in their private universes, and it is difficult to get word from one cocoon to the other…” Presidential Address 1996 by Ervin Laszlo “We have arrived at a watershed in the history of humanity.

A Nation at Risk by Bela H. “While an unchanging dominant majority is perpetually rehearsing its own defeat, fresh challenges are evoking fresh creative responses from newly recruited minorities, which proclaims their own creative power by rising, each time, to the occasion.” The Wholeness Principle by Anna Lemkow. What can systems theory do for me? - systems theory employment. Tell me all about Systems Theory, and how it can solve all my problems. I'm becoming interested in Systems Theory. For those of you who, like me, are pretty weak on exactly what this means, here's a brief link: Being a late bloomer, I'm just coming to the realization that there are whole fields of people who have been studying this stuff for decades.

I would like to: a) learn more about it and b) figure out how it might apply to future careers. A few words about me: I turn 48 next month, so the term “future careers” is feeling ever more awkward on my tongue. 1) What graduate programs exist in Canada that have anything to do with the stuff I just said? I'm looking for a real job with real pay and a real future. As usual, thank you!

Category:Systems scientists. This Category Systems scientists gives an overview of scientists in the different fields of systems science: Such as Chaos theory, Complex systems theory, Control theory, Cybernetics, Dynamical Systems, General systems theory, Living systems theory, Mathematical Systems theory, Operations researchers, Social Systems theory, Systems biology, Systems ecology, Systems engineers, and Systems theory.

Subcategories This category has the following 12 subcategories, out of 12 total. Pages in category "Systems scientists" The following 169 pages are in this category, out of 169 total. This list may not reflect recent changes (learn more).

Systemic Change

Transformation. Praxis. Reflexivity. Reflection. System Dynamics Home Page. New England Complex Systems Institute. Main_primer [ProjectsISSS] New Concepts of Matter, Life and Mind by Ervin Laszlo “In light of what scientists are beginning to glimpse regarding the nature of the quantum vacuum, the energy sea that underlies all of spacetime, it is no longer warranted to view matter as primary and space as secondary. It is to space or rather, to the cosmically extended “Dirac-sea” of the vacuum that we should grant primary reality. Interactivism LA Manifesto by Mark H.

Bickhard “The study of the mind is the last major holdout against the historical abandonment of substance models for process models. Phlogiston (fire), caloric (heat), magnetic fluid (magnetism), vital fluid (life) are all recognized as not only false models for their respective phenomena, but the wrong kind of model. Neither fire nor heat nor magnetism nor life are phenomena of particular substances.

Emergence by Mark H. The Whorphian Principle of Linguistic Relativity by Ludwig von Bertalanffy The Framework of Science by Vincent Vesterby Types of Systems by Bela H. Semiotics. Semiotics frequently is seen as having important anthropological dimensions; for example, Umberto Eco proposes that every cultural phenomenon may be studied as communication.[2] Some semioticians focus on the logical dimensions of the science, however. They examine areas belonging also to the life sciences – such as how organisms make predictions about, and adapt to, their semiotic niche in the world (see semiosis).

In general, semiotic theories take signs or sign systems as their object of study: the communication of information in living organisms is covered in biosemiotics (including zoosemiotics). Syntactics is the branch of semiotics that deals with the formal properties of signs and symbols.[3] More precisely, syntactics deals with the "rules that govern how words are combined to form phrases and sentences".[4] Terminology[edit] Ferdinand de Saussure, however, founded his semiotics, which he called semiology, in the social sciences: History[edit] Formulations[edit] Branches[edit] Notes. System Diagramming Resources (T552) Nature of Change. {To download a Word version, click here.} This article offers a simple typology of different kinds of change. It was developed to help clients understand change in organisations and it helps to explain the specific nature of organisational change as the most fundamental of these.

It also offers some thoughts on the nature of organisational change. Introduction I usually refer to myself as an organisational consultant; indeed, my masters degree is in organisational consultancy. The initial premise is that there are four kinds of change in organisations: l Process change. l System change. l Structural change. l Organisational change. In what follows I will say a little more about each—much more than I would expect to say to a potential client, but still being far from exhaustive.

Processes Processes are the ordered set of activities which are used to generate the outputs of an organisations. Business Process Re-engineering (BPR) was sold as a radical form of organisational transformation. Systems. Appreciative Inquiry. What is Appreciative Inquiry? By Joe Hall and Sue Hammond also offers a reasonably brief and readable introduction to the principles and practice of AI. Richard Seel: "We use AI principles quite a lot in our work – for instance, when a team I was working with suddenly had the plug pulled on their project they were very angry and depressed. I encouraged them to undertake a brief appreciative inquiry into the times when they had worked really well as a team.

The results were extremely positive. Although AI is often presented as an organizational intervention it can be very useful for facilitators working with small groups or teams. Appreciative Inquiry Summit When Appreciative Inquiry started it was usual for the four phases to be spread out over a long period of time. For instance, Roadway Express, a US trucking company, increased its fourth quarter turnover by 25% just a few months after holding an AI Summit. Resources Articles An early paper, discussing the basis of AI. Books Publications. Home Page of Mel Conway's Site. Author's note 33 years after publication: Perhaps this paper's most remarkable feature is that it made it to publication with its thesis statement in the third-last paragraph.

To save you the trouble of wading through 45 paragraphs to find the thesis, I'll give it to you now: Any organization that designs a system (defined more broadly here than just information systems) will inevitably produce a design whose structure is a copy of the organization's communication structure. This turns out to be a principle with much broader utility than software project management, where references to it usually occur. I invite you to read the paper, then look around to find applications. My current favorite is the complex of social issues encompassing welfare, access to labor markets, housing, education, and drugs.

After reading the paper, think about how the structures of our various governments affect their approaches to this system. Back to "Conway's Law" page How Do Committees Invent? Melvin E. The Cluetrain Manifesto.