Edward Snowden warns about loss of privacy in Christmas message - video. Edward Snowden to broadcast Channel 4's alternative Christmas Day message. Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who prompted a worldwide debate when he leaked a cache of top secret documents about US and UK spying, has recorded a Christmas Day television message in which he calls for an end to the mass surveillance revealed by his disclosures.
The short film was recorded for Channel 4, which has 20-year history of providing unusual but relevant figures as an alternative to the Queen's Christmas message shown by other UK broadcasters. It will be Snowden's first television appearance since arriving in Moscow. The address, broadcast at 4.15pm on Christmas Day, was filmed in Russia – where Snowden is living after being granted temporary asylum – by Laura Poitras, a film-maker who has closely collaborated with him on the NSA stories. Snowden said George Orwell "warned us of the danger of this kind of information" in his dystopian novel, 1984. "A child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all. Edward Snowden revelations prompt UN investigation into surveillance. The UN's senior counter-terrorism official is to launch an investigation into the surveillance powers of American and British intelligence agencies following Edward Snowden's revelations that they are using secret programmes to store and analyse billions of emails, phone calls and text messages.
NSA files decoded: Edward Snowden's surveillance revelations explained. Two factors opened the way for the rapid expansion of surveillance over the past decade: the fear of terrorism created by the 9/11 attacks and the digital revolution that led to an explosion in cell phone and internet use.
But along with these technologies came an extension in the NSA’s reach few in the early 1990s could have imagined. Details that in the past might have remained private were suddenly there for the taking. Chris Soghoian Principal technologist, ACLU. Greenwald Exits 'Guardian' Wednesday Updates: Pierre Omidyar just out with his own statement.
Among other things: "I developed an interest in supporting independent journalists in a way that leverages their work to the greatest extent possible, all in support of the public interest. And, I want to find ways to convert mainstream readers into engaged citizens. I think there’s more that can be done in this space, and I’m eager to explore the possibilities. " Jay Rosen just interviewed Omidyar, and here's one except: His interest in launching a new kind of news organization, capable of sustaining investigative work and having an effect with it, intensified throughout the summer as news from the Snowden files continued to pour forth.
Attempts to meet with Greenwald to discuss these plans and to find out more about how he operates were unsuccessful until this month. At the core of Newco will be a different plan for how to build a large news organization. Earlier: Glenn in this case is sort of a victim of a leak. Lucian J. Hudson, Director of Communications, The Open University – personal blog. Two things happened this week: it is a safe bet that Sir David Omand will be elevated to the House of Lords within the next year, and his intervention in the Snowden row reveals just how concerned the powers-that-be are that support for Snowden could prove corrosive.
After some superb, robust performances over the past fortnight by Sir David Omand, the avenging angel of UK’s securocrats, and Glen Greenwald, champion of Save our Snowdens International, now is the time for the voice of the squeezed middle to be heard. I am not unsympathetic to the claim by human rights campaigner Anthony Barnett, to whom The Open University rightly awarded a honorary doctorate, that there are deeper issues at stake than the Foreign Secretary, William Hague, implied by his statement that if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear (1).
The perfect epitaph for establishment journalism. Like many people, I've spent years writing and speaking about the lethal power-subservient pathologies plaguing establishment journalism in the west.
But this morning, I feel a bit like all of that was wasted time and energy, because this new column by career British journalist Chris Blackhurst - an executive with and, until a few months ago, the editor of the UK daily calling itself "The Independent" - contains a headline that says everything that needs to be said about the sickly state of establishment journalism: In other words, if the government tells me I shouldn't publish something, who am I as a journalist to disobey? Put that on the tombstone of western establishment journalism.
It perfectly encapsulates the death spiral of large journalistic outlets. If the security services insist something is contrary to the public interest, and might harm their operations, who am I (despite my grounding from Watergate onwards) to disbelieve them? " The Banality of Systemic Evil. The Stone is a forum for contemporary philosophers and other thinkers on issues both timely and timeless.
In recent months there has been a visible struggle in the media to come to grips with the leaking, whistle-blowing and hacktivism that has vexed the United States military and the private and government intelligence communities. This response has run the gamut. It has involved attempts to condemn, support, demonize, psychoanalyze and in some cases canonize figures like Aaron Swartz, Jeremy Hammond, Chelsea Manning and Edward Snowden. In broad terms, commentators in the mainstream and corporate media have tended to assume that all of these actors needed to be brought to justice, while independent players on the Internet and elsewhere have been much more supportive.
So has the younger generation lost its moral compass? No. Clearly, there is a moral principle at work in the actions of the leakers, whistle-blowers and hacktivists and those who support them. Manning could not play along. NSA surveillance: The US is behaving like China. Even though we know governments do all kinds of things I was shocked by the information about the US surveillance operation, Prism.
To me, it's abusively using government powers to interfere in individuals' privacy. This is an important moment for international society to reconsider and protect individual rights. I lived in the United States for 12 years. This abuse of state power goes totally against my understanding of what it means to be a civilised society, and it will be shocking for me if American citizens allow this to continue. The US has a great tradition of individualism and privacy and has long been a centre for free thinking and creativity as a result. In our experience in China, basically there is no privacy at all – that is why China is far behind the world in important respects: even though it has become so rich, it trails behind in terms of passion, imagination and creativity. But still, if we talk about abusive interference in individuals' rights, Prism does the same.
Edward Snowden: An A-Z of surveillance. The Snowden files: why the British public should be worried about GCHQ. American surveillance: The Snowden effect.