
Culture-Society-Economy
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
by Mike Kimel People always talk about the Laffer curve, but have you ever seen it estimated? Have you ever wondered why you don't?
The Laffer Curve and the Kimel Curve | Angry Bear - Financial and Economic Commentary
Population growth: the baby bomb | Editorial | Comment is free | The Guardian
Public Choice
civilization
Experimental economics: evolution, methods and achievements | vox - Research-based policy analysis and commentary from leading economists
Economist's View: "Is The American Dream A Myth?"
This article, previously published in Re-public (and written in cooperation with Franz Nahrada and Gleb Tyurin ), takes at hypothesis that a new long wave of strong capitalist growth is still in the realm of possibilities. My own position is that this still can happen, provided strong structural reforms would be undertaken, which is not very likely at this very moment, but could still take place a few years down the road under stronger social pressure. I do not believe however, that humanity has the time for a full Kondratieff wave of 50-60 years, given present danger signs for the biopsphere, and energy and resource depletion generally.
P2P practices as condition for the next long wave
Mind on Money
Global Perspective
healthcare
Credit
Immigration
Growth
Dissecting the social
Economist's View: Caballero: Pretense of Knowledge Syndrome
Its a recent development that economists are turning to neuroscience to inform and enrich economic theory. One controversial aspect is the potential use of neuroscience data to draw conclusions about welfare that go beyond traditional revealed preference. It is nicely summarized by this quote from Camerer, Lowenstein, and Prelec. The foundations of economic theory were constructed assuming that details about the functioning of the brain’s black box would not be known. This pessimism was expressed by William Jevons in 1871: I hesitate to say that men will ever have the means of measuring directly the feelings of the human heart.
A Thought Experiment: The Boundaries of Neuroeconomics « Cheap Talk
Corruption Around the World
In numerous past posts that focused on development, I have stressed that progress can seldom be made when a country is weighed down by corruption. Corruption is perhaps the single most corrosive factor that keeps developing countries mired in poverty. Corruption also affects developed countries since it unproductively siphons off resources. Each year Transparency International publishes a Corruption Perceptions Index in which it ranks how well or how poorly countries are doing when it comes to eliminating corruption.Now that the Internet connection problems are resolved, at least for the moment, here are the videos from the 1st day of the INET Conference here in Berlin: 2. From Post-War Economic Theory to Imperfect Knowledge Economics At the conference that he convened in 1969 in Philadelphia, Edmund Phelps unveiled a path-breaking approach to formal macroeconomic modeling that based macro-relationships on explicit micro-foundations.
Economist's View
Simon Johnson: The Banking Emperor Has No Clothes - NYTimes.com
Simon Johnson , the former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund , is the co-author of “ 13 Bankers .” In a major speech earlier this week to the American Bankers Association’s international monetary conference, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner laid out his view of what went wrong in the financial sector before 2008, how the crisis was handled 2008-10 and what is needed to reform the system. As chairman of the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the only senior member of President Obama ’s original economic team remaining in place, Mr. Geithner’s influence with regard to the banking system is second to none. Unfortunately, Mr.Avant garde economics - macrobusiness.com.au | macrobusiness.com.au#comment-36512
My esteemed co-blogger Deep T made the comment that too little attention is being paid on MacroBusiness to creative solutions to the problems that are documented in great detail on MacroBusiness. I would go a step further. Economic analysis generally suffers from a deep flaw. Because it is a quasi-science (although in no respect truly scientific) is does not concentrate on what is new and unique.I just posted this at MoneyWatch: Does This Ease Your Worries?: US GDP from 1870-2008 : As you can see from this picture, historically we've always recovered from recessions. Eventually. But as you can also see from the Great Depression, recovery has not always been immediate -- the source of Keynes famous "In the long-run we're all dead."
Economist's View: Does This Ease Your Worries?: US GDP from 1870-2008
Money
As Food Stamp Recipients Hit New Record, 400 Americans Account For 10% Of Capital Gains | zero hedge
Abundance vs Scarcity
ClimateChange
Education
HealthCare
ethnography
MillenniumProject

