background preloader

Observation instrument

Facebook Twitter

Critical Thinking Model 1. To Analyze Thinking We Must Identify and Question its Elemental Structures Standard: Clarityunderstandable, the meaning can be grasped Could you elaborate further? Could you give me an example? Could you illustrate what you mean? Standard: Accuracyfree from errors or distortions, true How could we check on that? Standard: Precisionexact to the necessary level of detail Could you be more specific? Standard: Relevancerelating to the matter at hand How does that relate to the problem? Standard: Depthcontaining complexities and multiple interrelationships What factors make this a difficult problem? Standard: Breadthencompassing multiple viewpoints Do we need to look at this from another perspective? Standard: Logicthe parts make sense together, no contradictions Does all this make sense together? Standard: Significancefocusing on the important, not trivial Is this the most important problem to consider?

Standard: FairnessJustifiable, not self-serving or one-sided Think About... State the Question. Why Do Teachers Ask the Questions They Ask? Although teacher questioning has received much attention in the past few years, studies on teacher questions in the ESL classroom have so far revolved around the ‘closed’/‘open’ or ‘display’/‘referential’ distinction. Findings from classroom observations show excessive use of closed questions by teachers in the classroom. The argument that has been more or less accepted is that such questions seek to elicit short, restricted student responses and are therefore purposeless in the classroom setting. This paper attempts to conduct an analytical discussion of the argument. The questions of three non-native ESL teachers during reading comprehension in the upper secondary school in Brunei are analysed using a three-level question construct. Through this three-level question analysis, it is possible to challenge the argument concerning question types and purposes.

Thought Questions - Asking the right questions is the answer. Bloom's taxonomy. "Taxonomy” simply means “classification”, so the well-known taxonomy of learning objectives is an attempt (within the behavioural paradigm) to classify forms and levels of learning. It identifies three “domains” of learning (see below), each of which is organised as a series of levels or pre-requisites.

It is suggested that one cannot effectively — or ought not try to — address higher levels until those below them have been covered (it is thus effectively serial in structure). As well as providing a basic sequential model for dealing with topics in the curriculum, it also suggests a way of categorising levels of learning, in terms of the expected ceiling for a given programme. Thus in the Cognitive domain, training for technicians may cover knowledge, comprehension and application, but not concern itself with analysis and above, whereas full professional training may be expected to include this and synthesis and evaluation as well. Yet more Notes arising from comments: How to Encourage Higher Order Thinking. Why Use This Tip What To Do Why Use This Tip A main goal of educators today is to teach students the skills they need to be critical thinkers.

Instead of simply memorizing facts and ideas, children need to engage in higher levels of thinking to reach their fullest potential. Practicing Higher Order Thinking (HOT) skills outside of school will give kids and teens the tools that they need to understand, infer, connect, categorize, synthesize, evaluate, and apply the information they know to find solutions to new and existing problems. After reading a book about Martin Luther King or studying the Civil Rights era, you could choose to ask a child a simple question such as “Who is Martin Luther King, Jr.?”.

Back to top What To Do Families and out-of-school educators can play a significant role in encouraging higher order thinking with their kids and teens, even when having a casual conversation. When reading a book: “What do you think might happen next?” When visiting an unfamiliar place: 5 Powerful Questions Teachers Can Ask Students. My first year teaching a literacy coach came to observe my classroom.

After the students left, she commented on how I asked the whole class a question, would wait just a few seconds, and then answer it myself. "It's cute," she added. Um, I don't think she thought it was so cute. I think she was treading lightly on the ever-so shaky ego of a brand-new teacher while still giving me some very necessary feedback. So that day, I learned about wait/think time. And also, over the years, I learned to ask better and better questions. Many would agree that for inquiry to be alive and well in a classroom that, amongst other things, the teacher needs to be expert at asking strategic questions, and not only asking well-designed ones, but ones that will also lead students to questions of their own. Keeping It Simple I also learned over the years that asking straightforward, simply-worded questions can be just as effective as those intricate ones.

. #1. This question interrupts us from telling too much. Culture of thinking. Blooms-verbs.jpg (JPEG Image, 756 × 567 pixels) Scientific Observation - Collecting Empirical Evidence. Scientific observation is the central element of scientific method or process. The core skill of scientist is to make observation. Observation consists of receiving knowledge of the outside world through our senses, or recording information using scientific tools and instruments. Any data recorded during an experiment can be called an observation. The Scientific Process A scientific process or scientific method requires observations of nature and formulating and testing the hypothesis. It consists of following four steps. Observe something and ask questions about a natural phenomenon (scientific observation) Make your hypothesis Make predictions about logical consequences of the hypothesis Test your predictions by controlled experiment, a natural experiment, an observational study or a field experiment Create your conclusion on the basis of data or information gathered in your experiment.

So How It Works? Make notes as you answer these questions Who are the subjects? Forming a Hypothesis. UIS Active Learning. DESCRIPTIONActive learning is a term referring to the engagement of students in some way with the topic to be learned. Students can be physically or cognitively engaged in an activity (i.e. something more than passive listening to a lecture or reading a text). Working exercises or participating in group projects or pursuing the higher orders of Bloom's taxonomy such as "applying, analyzing, evaluating, or creating" are good examples of active learning. “The process of having students engage in some activity that forces them to reflect upon ideas and how they are using those ideas. Requiring students to regularly assess their own degree of understanding and skill at handling concepts or problems in a particular discipline. OBJECTIVEThe objective of this workshop is to understand and be able to apply active learning principles in online teaching.

Passive approaches emphasize: Lectures Readings Watching video Listening to audio Observing demonstrations Active approaches emphasize: Arthur F. Masters Degree (Evaluation) – Module 5 – “A Brief Look Back”. | apophenia inc. Introduction. Writing a evaluation before the true end of any project, and so without the true distance of hindsight, will have its problems. So this text will tend to focus more on the overarching themes that instigated the study as well as a the influences upon those primary changes in attitude and practice that have come about through my studies. Year One Overview Here I focussed on a wider exploration of visualisation of information, and the development of in-action ( Schon) responses to the need (on my part) to visualise ideas and thoughts in order to convey complex information to Art and Design Students (and colleagues and peers) in my studio and beyond. Year Two Overview This final year was spent finalising examples of the responses to year ones research and survey data evaluation as well as a branching of those responses into another distinct area for investigation, i.e. the links between Deep Reading, Evolutionary Empathy, The Will to Experience and Imagination and Creativity.

Media. P-41-english1386.pdf. A Study on Senir High SchoolStudents' Cognitive Skill by Analyzing Th… Interaction analysis. Full_64.pdf. When #SOLO Met Bloom Taxonomy. If you are interested in the thinking (thinking might be too strong a term for what I was actually doing) that brought me to explore this relationship you might want to look at a previous post, “Posts Move, Goals Don’t.” Bloom’s Taxonomy Many of us are familiar with Bloom’s Taxonomy (1956) – or at least we think we are!

The standard list that I was given during teacher training consisted of: KnowledgeComprehensionApplicationAnalysisSynthesisEvaluation Did you know it was revised in 2000 or that it consisted of a set of four knowledge dimensions? In Bloom’s original work the knowledge dimensions consisted of factual, conceptual and procedural knowledge. Later the metacognitive knowledge dimension was added and the nouns changed to verbs with the last two cognitive processes switched in the order.

RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyseEvaluateCreate You can find a full summary of Bloom’s Taxonomy and the changes by Dr. SOLO Taxonomy Redesigning Classrooms: Using SOLO to Increase Challenge Like this: Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal - Instructional Materials: A platform to enhance cognitive skills and writing development. Instructional Materials: A platform to enhance cognitive skills and writing development Los materiales educativos: fundamentos para promover el desarrollo de la escritura y de las habilidades mentales Jorge Enrique Muñoz Oyola Part time Professor Universidad EAN (Escuela de Administración de Negocios) English Instructor Uniempresarial E-mail: Received 03-11-2009 / Accepted 17-01-2010 Abstract This paper describes the results of an action research project carried out with first graders at a private coeducational school in Bogotá, Colombia.

Key words: Cognitive skills, writing process, Structural Cognitive Modifiability, mediation. Resumen Este artículo describe los resultados de un proyecto de investigación-acción realizado con niños de primer grado en un colegio mixto privado en Bogotá, Colombia. Palabras claves: Habilidades mentales, proceso de escritura, Modificabilidad Estructural Cognitiva, mediación. Introduction Theoretical framework Materials Design Methodology Process.

Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal - Working by projects: A way to enrich critical thinking and the writing process in a third grade EFL classroom. Working by projects: A way to enrich critical thinking and the writing process in a third grade EFL classroom Trabajo por proyectos: pensamiento crítico y proceso escritural en inglés en un salón de tercero de primaria Sandra Dolores Ruiz Niño* Colegio José María Carbonell *Sandra Dolores Ruiz Niño is an elementary school teacher. She has worked in Ciudad Bolivar and San Cristobal. Nowadays, she works at Colegio José Maria Carbonell. Sandra graduated in Spanish and English studies from the Universidad Pedagógica in 1999. Received 21-Jul-2013/Accepted: 27-Nov-2013 Abstract This document presents the result of a qualitative action research developed with thirty-three third grade students at a public school in Bogota.

Key words: Critical thinking, Project work, writing skills. Resumen Este documento presenta el resultado de una investigación-acción cualitativa desarrollada con treinta y tres estudiantes de grado tercero de un colegio público de Bogotá. Résumé Introduction.