How Nuclear Power Works. The nuclear power plant stands on the border between humanity's greatest hopes and its deepest fears for the future. On one hand, atomic energy offers a clean energy alternative that frees us from the shackles of fossil fuel dependence. On the other, it summons images of disaster: quake-ruptured Japanese power plants belching radioactive steam, the dead zone surrounding Chernobyl's concrete sarcophagus.
But what happens inside a nuclear power plant to bring such marvel and misery into being? Imagine following a volt of electricity back through the wall socket, all the way through miles of power lines to the nuclear reactor that generated it. You'd encounter the generator that produces the spark and the turbine that turns it. Next, you'd find the jet of steam that turns the turbine and finally the radioactive uranium bundle that heats water into steam. The water in the reactor also serves as a coolant for the radioactive material, preventing it from overheating and melting down. Nuclear Energy Explained: How does it work? 1/3. Tour of Nuclear Power plant. Pros and Cons of Nuclear Energy.
As of today, nuclear energy is considered as one of the most environmentally friendly source of energy as it produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions during the production of electricity as compared to traditional sources like coal power plants. Nuclear fission is the process that is used in nuclear reactors to produce high amount of energy using element called uranium. It is the energy that is stored in the nucleus of an atom. While being environmentally friendly is the big plus of nuclear energy, disposal of radioactive waste and protecting people and environment from its radiations is a big cons of nuclear energy. Therefore, expensive solutions are needed to protect mother earth from the devastating effects of nuclear energy. When we think about this resource, many of us think about nuclear bombs or the meltdowns that have happened at a number of nuclear plants around the world.
Pros of Nuclear Energy 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Cons of Nuclear Energy 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Image credit Rinkesh. Energy Source Comparison | energy4me. The Future Of Clean Nuclear Energy Is Coming. Nuclear Power in France | French Nuclear Energy - World Nuclear Association. (Updated January 2016) France derives about 75% of its electricity from nuclear energy, due to a long-standing policy based on energy security. This share is to be reduced to 50% by 2025. France is the world's largest net exporter of electricity due to its very low cost of generation, and gains over €3 billion per year from this. France has been very active in developing nuclear technology. In 2014 French electricity generation was 541 TWh gross. Over the last decade France has exported up to 70 billion kWh net each year and EdF expects exports to continue at 55-70 TWh/yr.
France has 58 nuclear reactors operated by Electricite de France (EdF), with total capacity of 63.2 GWe, supplying 416 billion kWh (net) in 2014, 77% of the total generated there (RTE data). Total generating capacity (end 2014, RTE data) is 129 GWe, including 25.4 GWe hydro, 24.4 GWe fossil fuel, 9.1 GWe wind and 5.3 GWe solar PV. Recent energy policy In 2005 a law established guidelines for energy policy and security. US Nuclear Power Policy | Nuclear Energy Policy USA - World Nuclear Association. (Updated November 2015) While the USA has more private sector participation in the production of civilian nuclear power than any other nation, the government is heavily involved through safety and environmental regulations, R&D funding, and setting national energy goals.
Beginning in the late 1990s, US government policy and funding decisions have encouraged the development of greater civilian nuclear capacity. The commitment to nuclear power as part of the USA's long-term energy strategy continues, but there has been a reduction in some nuclear programs as a result of greater emphasis on alternative sources of energy. The disposal and storage of high-level nuclear waste remains a major unresolved issue. Over the last 30 years public opinion has steadily grown more positive towards nuclear energy.
Government policy is central to any discussion of nuclear power in the USA. Yet, the government remains more involved in commercial nuclear power than in any other industry in the USA. Automation Could Have Prevented Chernobyl. In the first part of this series, I described how automatic safety controls could have prevented the Three-Mile Island accident. Now I'll do the same for Chernobyl. This accident at the RBMK nuclear power plant at Chernobyl in the Ukraine occurred at 1:23 a.m. on April 26, 1986, right after the midnight shift change of the operators at Unit 4, which consisted of four 1000-MWe units, built in the 1970s. The meltdown caused a steam explosion that blew off the 2500-ton top of the reactor, followed by hydrogen explosions and a fire when the graphite in the core ignited. Twenty million curies of radioactivity were released, 30 times the nuclear fallout that occurred at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Thirty-one operators and fireman were killed, and over 100,000 people were evacuated. The released radioactivity cloud spread as far as Norway, and the atmosphere in the area is expected to remain radioactive for some 300 years (the ground itself, longer). The Process Design Errors.