Police State

FacebookTwitter

Data surveillance in the U.S.: necessary or 'obscenely outrageous'?

NEW: In March, the top U.S. intel official denied government was collecting details on Americans James Clapper now acknowledges the programs, say they are necessary and legal Clapper says media reports of unbridled surveillance are wrong But critics say U.S. programs go too far and should be rolled back http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/07/politics/nsa-data-mining/index.html
The National Security Agency is reportedly keeping track of the telephone records of millions of American Verizon customers.

Obama administration defends collecting Verizon phone data

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-obama-defends-verizon-data-collection-20130606,0,4449398.story
http://www.globalresearch.ca/cia-whistleblower-us-is-a-police-state-obama-consciously-allows-torture/5321505

CIA Whistleblower: “US is a Police State, Obama Consciously Allows Torture”

Ten years ago, the idea of the US government spying on its citizens, intercepting their emails or killing them with drones was unthinkable. But now it’s business as usual, says John Kiriakou, a former CIA agent and torture whistleblower. *** Kiriakou is now awaiting a summons to start a prison sentence.

DEA Ignored All My Cries: Student

http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local/daniel-chong-ucsd-san-diego-dea-149758275.html advertisement <a href="http://iv.doubleclick.net/jump/nbcu.lim.dgo/news-local-article;!category=dgo;!category=news;!category=;contentgroup=;;site=dgo;pid=;sect=news;sub=local;sub2=;contentid=149758275;contentgroup=;kw=;mtfIFPath=/includes/;tile=2;pos=1;sz=300x250,300x251,300x600;ord=123456a?"
(NaturalNews) You can tell a lot about a person by assessing what they purchase. It's called "consumer profiling," and corporations do it all the time. That's how those grocery store loyalty discount programs work, by the way -- they profile your psychology by analyzing what you're buying. From that information, they can target you for coupons, mailers and other marketing campaigns that "magically" speak to your particular interests. It's not magic, of course; it's just behavioral profiling .

What's the government buying these days? Hollow point bullets, hardened checkpoint booths and radiation pills

http://www.naturalnews.com/035607_government_checkpoints_Martial_Law.html

US Congress passes authoritarian anti-protest law

By Tom Carter 3 March 2012 Defend democratic rights! Support the Socialist Equality Party election campaign! For more information and to get involved, click here . http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2012/03/prot-m03.html

When the Right to Resist Becomes the "Duty to Submit"

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=37975 by William Norman Grigg Anne Dekins was a loud-mouthed party girl -- or at least, that's what the arrest warrant suggested. Whatever she may have done in the past, Miss Dekins was quietly minding her own business when Officer Samuel Bray found her on the street and began to haul her away. Dekins wasn’t inclined to go quietly, and she put up a struggle. Her cries for help attracted the interest of several armed men led by an individual named Tooley, who confronted Bray and demanded to know what he was doing to the frantic woman. The officer produced his official credentials and insisted that he was making a lawful arrest for “disorderly conduct.”
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/10/18/1027775/-TSA-Arrests-Me-for-Using-the-Fourth-Amendment-as-a-Weapon-Tales-from-the-Edge-of-a-Revolution-2

TSA Arrests Me for Using the Fourth Amendment as a Weapon (Tales from the Edge of a Revolution #2)

I'm speaking loud and clear so those around me can hear. Before I get to "unreasonable search" a man in an ill-fitting suit and a tie marches up to me. He tells me I was disrupting his operation. I have no idea what his position is. He stands in front of the metal detector--the first place they usually screen me.

Naomi Wolf: Fascist America, in 10 easy steps | World news

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/apr/24/usa.comment Last autumn, there was a military coup in Thailand. The leaders of the coup took a number of steps, rather systematically, as if they had a shopping list. In a sense, they did. Within a matter of days, democracy had been closed down: the coup leaders declared martial law, sent armed soldiers into residential areas, took over radio and TV stations, issued restrictions on the press, tightened some limits on travel, and took certain activists into custody. They were not figuring these things out as they went along. If you look at history, you can see that there is essentially a blueprint for turning an open society into a dictatorship.
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/how-the-new-protecting-children-bill-puts-you-at-risk/590

How the new ‘Protecting Children’ bill puts you at risk

Last Thursday the U.S. House of Representatives' judiciary committee passed a bill that makes the online activity of every American available to police and attorneys upon request under the guise of protecting children from pornography. Note: Update with citizen petitions on page 2 .
Over the last decade, virtually every Terrorist plot aimed at the U.S. — whether successful or failed — has provoked greater security and surveillance measures. Within a matter of mere weeks, the 9/11 attacks infamously spawned a vast new surveillance statute (the Patriot Act), a secretly implemented warrantless eavesdropping program in violation of the law, an explosion of domestic surveillance contracts, a vastly fortified secrecy regime , and endless wars in multiple countries. As it turned out, that massive over-reaction was not a crisis-driven anomaly but rather the template for future actions. The reaction to the heinous Oslo attack by Norway’s political class has been exactly the opposite: a steadfast refusal to succumb to hysteria and a security- über-alles mentality.

An un-American response to the Oslo attack - Glenn Greenwald

Prisoners earning 23 cents an hour in U.S. federal prisons are manufacturing high-tech electronic components for Patriot Advanced Capability 3 missiles, launchers for TOW (Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided) anti-tank missiles, and other guided missile systems. A March article by journalist and financial researcher Justin Rohrlich of World in Review is worth a closer look at the full implications of this ominous development. (minyanville.com) The expanding use of prison industries, which pay slave wages, as a way to increase profits for giant military corporations, is a frontal attack on the rights of all workers. Prison labor — with no union protection, overtime pay, vacation days, pensions, benefits, health and safety protection, or Social Security withholding — also makes complex components for McDonnell Douglas/Boeing’s F-15 fighter aircraft, the General Dynamics/Lockheed Martin F-16, and Bell/Textron’s Cobra helicopter.

The Pentagon and Slave Labor in U.S. Prisons

By **William D. Hartung** From TomDispatch.Com . Have you noticed that Lockheed Martin, the giant weapons corporation, is shadowing you? No?

William D. Hartung: Is Lockheed Martin Shadowing You?: How a Giant Weapons Maker Became the New Big Brother

Gen David Petraeus has previously said US online psychological operations are aimed at 'countering extremist ideology and propaganda'. Photograph: Cliff Owen/AP The US military is developing software that will let it secretly manipulate social media sites by using fake online personas to influence internet conversations and spread pro-American propaganda. A Californian corporation has been awarded a contract with United States Central Command (Centcom), which oversees US armed operations in the Middle East and Central Asia, to develop what is described as an "online persona management service" that will allow one US serviceman or woman to control up to 10 separate identities based all over the world. The project has been likened by web experts to China's attempts to control and restrict free speech on the internet.

Revealed: US spy operation that manipulates social media | Technology

Kentucky vs King: Supreme Court Curtails 4th Amendment

Fourth Amendment Compromised by Supreme Court in Kentucky vs. King Ruling The US Supreme Court ruled that police officers can decide amongst themselves whether or not they need a warrant to enter a suspect's home. Previously, police have been able to do so only when clear exigencies existed; in other words, when a clear danger was present.