How I became a 'terrorist'
gary's choices - Who’s Afraid of the Ayatollahs?
2050 or Bust
<a href="//ad.doubleclick.net/jump/teg.lasn/akwi/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n;!c=21542416;dcopt=ist;pos=ldr_top;sz=728x90,970x90,970x250;tile=1;ord=112879051?" target="_blank"><img src="//ad.doubleclick.net/ad/teg.lasn/akwi/a;subs=n;wsub=n;sdn=n;!c=21542416;dcopt=ist;pos=ldr_top;sz=728x90,970x90,970x250;tile=1;ord=112879051?" Central banks: Crazy aunt on the loose
How Austerity Is Killing Europe by Jeff Madrick Jeff Madrick Milos Bicanski/Getty Images A man walking past graffiti, Athens, December 6, 2011 On the last day of 2011, a headline in The Wall Street Journal read: “Spain Misses Deficit Target, Sets Cuts.” The cruel forces of poor economic logic were at work to welcome in the new year.
A few months ago, I came across an announcement that Citigroup, the parent company of Citibank, was to be honored, along with its chief executive, Vikram Pandit, for “Advancing the Field of Asset Building in America.” This seemed akin to, say, saluting BP for services to the environment or praising Facebook for its commitment to privacy. During the past decade, Citi has become synonymous with financial misjudgment, reckless lending, and gargantuan losses: what might be termed asset denuding rather than asset building. In late 2008, the sprawling firm might well have collapsed but for a government bailout. Even today the U.S. taxpayer is Citigroup’s largest shareholder.
Samuel Huntington's article "The Clash of Civilizations?" appeared in the Summer 1993 issue of Foreign Affairs , where it immediately attracted a surprising amount of attention and reaction. Because the article was intended to supply Americans with an original thesis about "a new phase" in world politics after the end of the cold war, Huntington's terms of argument seemed compellingly large, bold, even visionary. He very clearly had his eye on rivals in the policy-making ranks, theorists such as Francis Fukuyama and his "end of history" ideas, as well as the legions who had celebrated the onset of globalism, tribalism and the dissipation of the state. But they, he allowed, had understood only some aspects of this new period. He was about to announce the "crucial, indeed a central, aspect" of what "global politics is likely to be in the coming years." The Clash of Ignorance
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-78448" title="pencil-eraser-flickr-mujalifah" src="http://www.wired.com/images_blogs/wiredscience/2011/10/pencil-eraser-flickr-mujalifah.jpg" alt="" width="660" height="428" /> The physicist Niels Bohr once defined an expert as “a person who has made all the mistakes that can be made in a very narrow field.” Bohr’s quip summarizes one of the essential lessons of learning, which is that people learn how to get it right by getting it wrong again and again. Education isn’t magic.