background preloader

Jim Crow Laws - Separate Is Not Equal

Jim Crow Laws - Separate Is Not Equal
“Marriages are void when one party is a white person and the other is possessed of one-eighth or more negro, Japanese, or Chinese blood.” —Nebraska, 1911 “Separate free schools shall be established for the education of children of African descent; and it shall be unlawful for any colored child to attend any white school, or any white child to attend a colored school.” —Missouri, 1929 “All railroads carrying passengers in the state (other than street railroads) shall provide equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more passenger cars for each passenger train, or by dividing the cars by a partition, so as to secure separate accommodations.” See more Jim Crow laws Restricted real-estate covenant In communities across the country, property owners signed agreements called restrictive covenants. Related:  'I know why the caged bird sings'Kalla kriget

Jim Crow Museum: Origins of Jim Crow Jim Crow was the name of the racial caste system which operated primarily, but not exclusively in southern and border states, between 1877 and the mid-1960s. Jim Crow was more than a series of rigid anti-black laws. It was a way of life. The Jim Crow system was undergirded by the following beliefs or rationalizations: whites were superior to blacks in all important ways, including but not limited to intelligence, morality, and civilized behavior; sexual relations between blacks and whites would produce a mongrel race which would destroy America; treating blacks as equals would encourage interracial sexual unions; any activity which suggested social equality encouraged interracial sexual relations; if necessary, violence must be used to keep blacks at the bottom of the racial hierarchy. A black male could not offer his hand (to shake hands) with a white male because it implied being socially equal. Never assert or even intimate that a white person is lying. Barbers. © Dr. References

List of Jim Crow law examples by State A Black American drinks from a segregated water cooler in 1939 at a streetcar terminal in Oklahoma City. This is a list of examples of Jim Crow laws, which were state and local laws in the United States enacted between 1876 and 1965. Jim Crow laws existed mainly in the South and originated from the Black Codes that were enforced from 1865 to 1866 and from prewar segregation on railroad cars in northern cities. The laws sprouted up in the late 19th century after Reconstruction and lasted until the 1960s.[1] They mandated de jure segregation in all public facilities, with a supposedly "separate but equal" status for black Americans. In reality, this led to treatment that was usually inferior to those provided for white Americans, systematizing a number of economic, educational and social disadvantages.[2] State-sponsored school segregation was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1954 in Brown v. Arizona[edit] California[edit] Colorado[edit] Connecticut[edit]

Jim Crow Laws - Martin Luther King Jr National Historic Site From the 1880s into the 1960s, a majority of American states enforced segregation through "Jim Crow" laws (so called after a black character in minstrel shows). From Delaware to California, and from North Dakota to Texas, many states (and cities, too) could impose legal punishments on people for consorting with members of another race. The most common types of laws forbade intermarriage and ordered business owners and public institutions to keep their black and white clientele separated. Nurses: No person or corporation shall require any white female nurse to nurse in wards or rooms in hospitals, either public or private, in which negro men are placed. Buses: All passenger stations in this state operated by any motor transportation company shall have separate waiting rooms or space and separate ticket windows for the white and colored races. Intermarriage: The marriage of a person of Caucasian blood with a Negro, Mongolian, Malay, or Hindu shall be null and void.

9 questions about Syria you were too embarrassed to ask The United States and allies are preparing for a possibly imminent series of limited military strikes against Syria, the first direct U.S. intervention in the two-year civil war, in retaliation for President Bashar al-Assad's suspected use of chemical weapons against civilians. If you found the above sentence kind of confusing, or aren't exactly sure why Syria is fighting a civil war, or even where Syria is located, then this is the article for you. What's happening in Syria is really important, but it can also be confusing and difficult to follow even for those of us glued to it. Here, then, are the most basic answers to your most basic questions. First, a disclaimer: Syria and its history are really complicated; this is not an exhaustive or definitive account of that entire story, just some background, written so that anyone can understand it. Read award-winning novelist Teju Cole's funny and insightful parody of this article, "9 questions about Britain you were too embarrassed to ask

The five biggest threats to human existence In the daily hubbub of current “crises” facing humanity, we forget about the many generations we hope are yet to come. Not those who will live 200 years from now, but 1,000 or 10,000 years from now. I use the word “hope” because we face risks, called existential risks, that threaten to wipe out humanity. Not everyone has ignored the long future though. But had these pioneers or futurologists not thought about humanity’s future, it would not have changed the outcome. We are in a more privileged position today. Future imperfect Yet, these risks remain understudied. If humanity becomes extinct, at the very least the loss is equivalent to the loss of all living individuals and the frustration of their goals. With that in mind, I have selected what I consider the five biggest threats to humanity’s existence. Finally, just because something is possible and potentially hazardous, doesn’t mean it is worth worrying about. 1. The Cuban Missile crisis was very close to turning nuclear. 2. 3. 4.

Examples of Jim Crow Laws "It shall be unlawful for a negro and white person to play together or in company with each other at any game of pool or billiards." This selection is an example of a Jim Crow law that was effective in the state of Alabama from the late 19th century to the early 20th century. Jim Crow laws functioned to keep black and white people separated, particularly in social settings and social institutions such as marriage. The states and cities were allowed to punish people who went against these laws. More Jim Crow Laws These hateful laws worked to enforce segregation amongst the races, which ultimately led to civil rights actions starting in the 1950s, led by individuals such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks. Examples of laws that caused these extreme tensions in the country included the following: Marriage - "All marriages between a white person and a negro, or between a white person and a person of negro descent to the fourth generation inclusive, are hereby forever prohibited."

Remembering Jim Crow : Presented by American RadioWorks Jim Crow laws robbed African Americans of basic rights. Danger, Violence, Exploitation Blacks in the Jim Crow South faced lynchings, insults and thievery at the hands of whites. Communities "Behind the Veil"African Americans built vital social institutions to fight segregation and uplift the race. Keeping the PastBlack families used oral storytelling and photography to pass along their memories of slavery and Reconstruction. ResistanceMany African Americans found subtle ways to combat the humiliation and economic hardship imposed by Jim Crow. Whites Remember Jim Crow In the southwestern Louisiana town of New Iberia, older whites say race relations were more peaceful during Jim Crow than they are now. Jim Crow LawsA sampling of repressive Jim Crow laws. Resources Informants, documentary audio and transcript, links, and books.

Challenging Jim Crow - AP U.S. History Topic Outlines - Study Notes Brown v. Board of Education In 1896, the Supreme Court upheld state racial segregation laws based on the "separate but equal" doctrine in Plessy v. During the next five decades, blacks and whites went to separate schools, ate at separate restaurants, rode on separate buses, and drank from separate water fountains. The first real challenge to the constitutionality of state segregation laws came in 1938 when a black student, Lloyd Gaines, was denied admission to the Missouri School of Law. As court rulings began to challenge school segregation, much of the American public, particularly residents of southern states, remained opposed to allowing black students into white schools. In 1953, President Dwight Eisenhower appointed Earl Warren to the Supreme Court. The case centered on Linda Brown, who lived with her family in Topeka, Kansas. Thurgood Marshall, the NAACP's legal director, argued before the Court on behalf of Brown. The resistance measures were effective. Civil Unrest

Jaltakonferensen Den 4–12 februari 1945 träffades Storbritanniens premiärminister Winston Churchill, USA:s president Franklin D Roosevelt och Sovjetunionens ledare Josef Stalin i Jalta på Krim. Under mötet diskuterade de tre allierade ledarna frågor som rörde krigsslutet och tiden därefter. Tyskland skulle tvingas att kapitulera villkorslöst.Efter kapitulationen skulle Tyskland delas in i fyra ockupationszoner: en brittisk, en fransk, en amerikansk och en sovjetisk.Den allierade ockupationspolitiken skulle skötas av en särskild kontrollkommission.Tyskland skulle demilitariseras.Det tyska folket skulle avnazifieras.Förenta Nationerna (FN) skulle bildas som en världsomfattande freds- och säkerhetsorganisation. En konfliktfråga mellan de två västliga ledarna och Stalin var Östeuropas och framför allt Polens framtid. Många länder i Östeuropa hade redan erövrats av den sovjetiska armén och ingått avtal som, på ett eller annat sätt, band dem till Sovjetunionen.

The Zombie Manifesto: Marx & The Walking Dead | SociologyFocus AMC’s award-winning zombie apocalypse drama The Walking Dead is currently in its third season of undead annihilation. The show’s protagonists are a motley crew of survivors, led by Sheriff Rick Grimes, who have beat the odds to stay alive in the Georgia wilderness. In this post, Ami Stearns pits the human group as communists employing classic Marxist tenets to avoid being eaten by the cold-blooded symbols of capitalism. “Society suddenly finds itself put back into a state of momentary barbarism; it appears as if a famine, a universal war of devastation, had cut off the supply of every means of subsistence; industry and commerce seem to be destroyed…” Karl Marx, The Zombie Communist Manifesto The Face of Capitalism? That sound of a twig snapping in the forest? I’m a sociologist, so I did what sociologists do; I analyzed the zombiepocalypse sociologically. The survival tactics of Grimes’ warm-blooded group in The Walking Dead can be viewed through the lens of Marxist theory. Dig Deeper:

Jim Crow Laws - Martin Luther King Jr National Historic Site From the 1880s into the 1960s, a majority of American states enforced segregation through "Jim Crow" laws (so called after a black character in minstrel shows). From Delaware to California, and from North Dakota to Texas, many states (and cities, too) could impose legal punishments on people for consorting with members of another race. The most common types of laws forbade intermarriage and ordered business owners and public institutions to keep their black and white clientele separated. Here is a sampling of laws from various states. Nurses: No person or corporation shall require any white female nurse to nurse in wards or rooms in hospitals, either public or private, in which negro men are placed. Buses: All passenger stations in this state operated by any motor transportation company shall have separate waiting rooms or space and separate ticket windows for the white and colored races. Intermarriage: It shall be unlawful for a white person to marry anyone except a white person.

These segregation laws demonstrate full well that at this time black people were not by any means equal to americans. Their goal was to demolish black people's reputation. This, in term, implies restricting rights and priviliges of black people which brings us back to racial discrimination, exclusion and rejection of an individual from a group or society. by crisandfelix Oct 31

Related: