Home Page | UniverseInstitute.org. SCiO event - perspectives on enterprise architecture and systems thinking.pdf. Systems Thinking from the Interwebs. Wholeness Seminar Home page. From Systems Thinking to Systems Being. A system is a set of interconnected elements which form a whole and show properties which are properties of the whole rather than of the individual elements. This definition is valid for a cell, an organism, a society, or a galaxy. Joanna Macy says that a system is less a thing than a pattern—a pattern of organization. It consists of a dynamic flow of interactions which is non-summative, irreducible, and integrated at a new level of organization permitted by the interdependence of its parts.
The word “system” derives from the Greek “synhistanai” which means “to place together.” In his seminal book Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Peter Checkland defined systems thinking as thinking about the world through the concept of “system.” From a cognitive perspective, systems thinking integrates analysis and synthesis. "From the moon, the Earth is so small and so fragile, and such a precious little spot in that Universe, that you can block it out with your thumb. Systems Thinking and CPM Facilitators | International Centre for Complex Project Management. The following QUT staff facilitate the Systems Thinking and Complex Project Management Courses. Dr Geoffrey Abbott Qualifications PhD (Business) 2006: Australian National UniversityBachelor of Arts with Honours in Psychology, 2002: University of Western SydneyGraduate Diploma of Psychology, 1999: Charles Sturt UniversityBachelor of Arts, 1977: University of TasmaniaDiploma of Education, 1977: University of Tasmania Background Geoff is a Corporate Educator in Corporate Education within QUT’s Faculty of Business.
He teaches various programs related to Leadership, including within the Executive Masters of Complex Project Management, Executive MBA, and the Management Development Program. Research Interests International business coachingLeadershipSystems thinking and holistic decision makingCross cultural managementOrganisational values Dr Erin Evans PhD (University of Queensland)MBA (Henley, UK)B Appl. Erin is a Corporate Educator in Corporate Education within QUT’s Faculty of Business. TED Talk 2014 | Ray Kurzweil: “Get ready for hybrid thinking” video now playing. Read full article here TED | Two hundred million years ago, our mammal ancestors developed a new brain feature: the neocortex. This stamp-sized piece of tissue, wrapped around a brain the size of a walnut, is the key to what humanity has become. Now, futurist Ray Kurzweil suggests, we should get ready for the next big leap in brain power, as we tap into the computing power in the cloud. related reading: TED | main TED | TED blog video YouTube channel related reading: TED | “Hacked: The speakers in session 8 of TED 2014″
7 reasons you shouldn’t touch systems thinking. A roundup of operations research models for finding love | Punk Rock Operations Research. February 14, 2013 Happy Valentine’s Day from Punk Rock OR! I decided to do a little sleuthing about operations research and love. I was pleasantly surprised to find several mathematical models for finding love (optimally or not). I blogged about optimally allocating marriages yesterday, but it’s still worth reading another blog post on it. Anna Nagurney blogged about a paper in EJOR about a linear assignment model that optimally matches couples in Switzerland. The authors identified weights for the pairings using output from logistic regression models that predict marital success using socioeconomic factors. Tallys Yunes developed an transportation model for Excel Solver that determines how someone can optimally send flowers to a nine love interests.
Mike Trick beautifully blogged about using–and not using–the Secretary Problem to optimally find love. Thaddeus Sim blogged about consolidating flower deliveries to optimally deliver flowers on Valentine’s Day. Like this: Like Loading... Conversation is not communication | The science of enterprise—and doing good. Conversation is co-ordination not communication. This is the point where e=mc3 (cubed) really begins to depart from the normal approach to innovating, creativity, small business and organisation development. Conversing is the most important activity you will ever engage in. You live—I live—everyone lives in language. I am a proponent, a fan (as in fanatic), of the work of two biologists Humberto Maturana and (the late) Francisco Varela. They have attempted to explain the dynamics of human social systems as systems constituted by individual living systems (e.g., us Homo sapiens).
For example, this would lead to the conclusion there’s no such thing as a learning organisation, only an organisation of ( a ‘co-ordination of’ perhaps?) Common wisdom says that language is a means of communication—but it’s not that simple. There’s an increasing amount of evidence of limits to the number of people who can work together. Moving in time from left to right, a solution gradually emerges. Coevolving Innovations | What is a system? (and the challenges of definition) When asked “what is a system?” , a deep systems thinker may hesitate to respond. He or she may be reflecting on whether the response should be “what does a system mean to you?” , or “what should a system mean to me”? The systems thinker recognizes that meaning comes in a context, and is therefore associated with a system of ideas held by an individual (i.e. me or you) occurs within an environment (i.e. my experience or your experience). In parallel, consider the question “what is a mother”?
Mother1. a woman in relation to a child or children to whom she has given birth:‘a mother penguin’‘a mother of three’2. On the other hand, the responses to “what does a mother mean to you?” What is a mother? Thus, for a systems thinker, a word is part of his or her system of ideas. Theory1. a supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained: ‘Darwin’s theory of evolution‘ C. 1. References. Beyond Connecting the Dots. Workshops « Systemic Design. Back to RSD2 >>>>> All workshops were held Wednesday 9th October 2013 at AHO 1. Doctoral Symposium Workshop Alex Ryan, PhD 2. The experience of becoming a member of a systemic design team Harold Nelson & Robert Sandusky 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. The Doctoral Symposium Workshop organized 9 PhD students from 3 universities to review their dissertations from a systemic design perspective.
Each participant provided an overview of their research, emphasizing open questions and issues rather than results and answers. Outcomes of the workshop included: Participants received external feedback and suggestions on their most significant open issues;Participants received tailored literature references and ideas for integrating systems thinking with design in their projects;Participants increased their understanding of systems thinking;Participants gained an appreciation of the research their peers are performing; andParticipants networked with other PhD candidates. 2. Harold Nelson & Robert Sandusky Full report 3. Systems Engineering Management - SEBOK.
This knowledge area is about managing the resources and assets allocated to perform , often in the context of a or a , but sometimes in the context of a less well-defined activity. is distinguished from general by its focus on the technical or engineering aspects of a project. SEM also encompasses exploratory research and development (R&D) activities at the level in commercial or government operations. Topics Each part of the SEBoK is composed of knowledge areas (KAs). Each KA groups topics together around a theme related to the overall subject of the part.
This KA contains the following topics: See the article for a mapping of case studies and vignettes included in Part 7 to topics covered in Part 3. Discussion Implementing (SE) requires the coordination of technical and managerial endeavors. The Venn diagram below provides some context for thinking about SEM. Figure 1. There is no one-size-fits-all way to define the details of where SEM functions are performed.
References Works Cited None. World Transformation. Systemic Thinking | Human Systems Resources | Articles and Information on Leadership Skills, Team Building, and Team Conflict Resolution Strategies. Essential Tools | Systemic Thinking Systemic Thinking A fairly pervasive approach to change defines a goal, then sets out in as straight a tactical line as possible to get there. Such an approach tries to ignore or run-over any intervening or obstructing variables like the fact that several people don't want the goal to be reached or don't appreciate the tactics being used.
A systems orientation to change management looks at human systems holistically. It understands that any change within a system will reverberate throughout the entire system and impact even seemingly unrelated parts of the system. Using a systems orientation we… Here are some things to think about to help you think systemically: Universal Connectedness: everything is connected to everything else-things, processes, thoughts, feelings, and actions. The Systems Thinker Newsletter. Thinking systemically | Capacity.org.
Perspectives A systemic approach involves more than studying how boxes and lines fit together or how information networks operate. Just looking at the ‘bigger picture’ or exploring interconnections does not make an inquiry ‘systemic’. What makes it systemic is how you look at the picture, big or small, and explore interconnections. When people observe inter-relationships they ‘see’ and interpret them in different ways. People participate in projects for many different reasons. Think of your own involvement in the capacity development field. How many different ways of seeing your involvement are there, and how do they affect the kinds of decisions you make? Thus we cannot comprehend the behaviour of a programme without identifying and understanding a wide range of perspectives.
The implications of the introduction of ‘perspectives’ as a core systems concept were profound. The systems field draws on a number of approaches for exposing and exploring perspectives, including asking: Thinkipedia - What is Boundary Critique? Boundary Critique: Definition and History Theory Behind Boundary Critique Midgley and Munlo write in "The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people," (see below in "References" for full citation), "...the boundary of analysis is crucial. What is to be included in, or excluded from, any analysis is a vital consideration: something that appears to be an improvement given a narrowly defined boundary may not be seen as an improvement at all if the boundaries are pushed out," (pg 467). .
In the same paper, Midgley and Munlo credit C.W. Churchman as starting the discussion that became boundary critique. They write, "Prior to the work of Churchman, many people assumed that the boundaries of a system are 'given' by the structure of reality. History of the Term So What is Boundary Critique? How Can Boundary Critique Be Applied? Related Pages Critical Systems Thinking (CST)Critical Systems Heuristics** Resources Authors: B Brugha, C. Bryant, J. Authors: C Notes. From Pyramid to pancake. A lot of people agree that managing a company today , cannot be done anymore by using only our linear thinking.The complexity of our society is asking for a real paradigm shift in thinking:systemsthinking . There is more and more the belief that it will be one of the most needed competency for the future and therefore ,I want to share a Blogspot from Josephine Green, who say’s that we don’t have to control complexity , but to share it in our system.
Her it comes: A worldview based on linearity, industrialism and materialism is now giving way to a new one born out of chaos and complexity, networks and systems thinking. How do we live and work meaningfully in this charged and fluid terrain of the future? International leader in Social Foresight for Strategy and Innovation, Josephine Green, will show us the ways to decentralise and distribute innovation, strategy and design in her keynote: ‘Engaging with the Future Differently — From Pyramids to Pancakes’ Some of the things we need to address: Systems Theory: The Uber-Geek Tshirt. Five Core Theories – Systems Theory – Organisation Development « Organisation Development.
Post There are five core theories that provide a solid foundation for the work that OD practitioners do. Good grounding in theory is essential for every OD practitioner. The better you understand the theory, the better you will understand the complex and intricate nature of the OD process and OD tool kit. Systems Theory was first introduced by Van Bertalanffy (1950) and was introduced into the organisational setting by Kataz and Khan (1966). Systems theory is an approach to organisations which likens the enterprise to an organism with interdependent parts, each with its own specific function and interrelated responsibilities.
The system may be the whole organisation, a division, department or team; but whether the whole or a part, it is important for the OD practitioner to understand how the system operates, and the relationship the parts of the organisation have. Applying Systems Theory in an OD Intervention. Speakers | Announcements. International Federation for Systems Research » Uniting the World in Systems Science. EXCLUSIVE: Demand will grow for systems thinkers, predicts Forum for Future chief. Isss57.com. Hierarchical Modelling: A Systemic Framework. Hierarchical Modelling: A Systemic Framework Erminia Vaccari, Maria D'Amato, and William Delaney According to Steier [1992] one main difference between systems theorists and cyerneticians centers on what is offered as a main principle of systems theory, as put forth by systems theorists, for example, von Bertalanffy [1968], concerning the necessity of a particular form of relationship, namely that of hierarchy.
The paper focuses on the necessity to represent hierarchy when modeling systems of organised complexity [Weaver 1948]. A model can be hierarchical in different senses, e.g.: ] a) connections between certain sub-models may represent authority relations [Simon,1962] in the real system, whereby subordinate sub-models are controlled by higher level sub-models; b) a sub-system, S, may be represented twice in a model, once by a sub-model representing S as a whole and once by a set of sub-models representing the constituent sub-systems of S. References [Steier, 1992] Frederick Steier. Modifying the Teaching/Learning Process in an Interactive Video Network: A Systemic Analysis Approach.
Scientific classification and taxonomy. Scientific classification and taxonomy All sciences classify their objects. Astronomy classify celestial bodies such as planets, stars and galaxies, botany classify plants, chemistry the chemicals, medicine classify the illnesses, psychology classify mental processes, library and information science classify documents and systems of knowledge organization, religious studies classify the religions, etc. etc. Such classifications are not performed just in order to create an aesthetic effect or something like this. Classifications are constructed in order to work efficiently. Illnesses and drugs are, for example, classified in order to help patients recover from their illness.
Classification is not something extra put on the top of scientific work, but is deeply integrated in scientific work. If a new group of chemical substances are demonstrated to help cure a certain disease, they are classified as drug (e.g. as antidepressives, tranquillizers or antiinflammatory drugs). Literature: Modern Systemic Leadership. Systems. connecting matter, life, culture and technology. Bertalanffy's General Systems Theory: The Topology of Mind Development. Systems thoery. Lifeboat. THE COUNT-UP TO 2052: AN OVERARCHING FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION. What is Critical Thinking. Critical Self-awareness and Personal Literacy - Graduate Attributes in Action - Brookes Wiki. Systems Thinking Definitions. Society as a Complex Adaptive System | Walter Buckley | 1968 | Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist | In brief. David Ing. Global Systems 2.0 — The Dalai Lama visits MIT (Full Video)
International Encyclopedia of Systems and Cybernetics. The Macroscope: Chap. 1. Entry.aspx?entry=0142. Holistic-Systems Thinking | Exploration and wonder... Richard Tabor Greene. Triarchy Press - Publishers of altThink - the best new alternative thinking about organisations and society. Triarchy. Thoughts - Triarchy Press.
The Globalization Website - Theories. Systemic Intervention Principles. Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies. Systems Theory/Cybernetics. Systemic Thinking. IPCC. NeWater - New Approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty. The Internet: Saving Civilization or Trashing the Planet? | Serendipity. Rosen Enterprises. Information Systems. Information Systems Foundations: Constructing and Criticising. Systems Thinking Principles. Thinking with systems—Part 1 | Beyond this Brief Anomaly. Critical Thinking. System, order, organization, and classification Concepts.
Systems Thinking, Systems Tools and Chaos Theory. The Paradigm Shift of Systems Theory. Opinion: Biodiversity Impacts Humanity. Adapting to a New Economy. Master of Business Administration (MBA) Layered-Emergent-Dynamics. Rich pictures. Systems thinking - Brisbane transport concept. Coevolving Innovations | Reconciling Perspectives in Futures Research and Systems Thinking. About Systems of Life | Systems of Life. ThinkLets / NeuroScapes. Introduction to Principia Cybernetica. THE GENERAL SYSTEM? What is Systems Theory?
In2:InThinking Network InSights. Consortium for the Science of Sociotechnical Systems. Make it Obsolete « Essays « Pete Michaud. Philadelphia University | Strategic Design MBA About the Program. Xinwei/classes/readings/Maturana/autopoesis_and_cognition.pdf. Dave Ackley Profile. Systems in action: To engineer is human. The Cell and Systems « Anthony’s Digital Portfolio. After the meeting is before the meeting. Omics (and Blogonomics) « In brief. David Ing. Systems Thinking Part 1: Philosophy - Teen Skepchick. A Few Notes from ISSS San Jose 2012. WEF Reports – Global Agenda Survey 2011. Postmodern method. Guardian.co.uk | Search | "systems thinking"