background preloader

CCSS Research

Facebook Twitter

15_Developmentally Appropriate Practice and the Common Core State Standards. Eight problems with Common Core Standards. Correction: The original post said incorrectly that the Common Core was written with no public dialogue or feedback from experienced educators. The post now says there was insufficient public dialogue and feedback from experienced educators. This was written by Marion Brady, veteran teacher, administrator, curriculum designer and author. By Marion Brady E.D. Hirsch, Jr.’s book, “Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know,” was published March 1, 1987. So it was probably in March of that year when, sitting at a dining room table in an apartment on Manhattan’s Upper East Side, my host — a Third grade teachers learn how to teach common core mathematics in Tennessee.

I don’t remember what I said, but it was probably some version of what I’ve long taken for granted: Most people think that whatever they and the people they like happen to know, everybody else should be required to know. It’s a bad idea. Two: The world changes. Five: The Common Core kills innovation. “Why a whole week?” The Problems and Promise of Common Core | Harvard Graduate School of Education. In the handful of years since the Common Core State Standards were unveiled and quickly adopted by 45 states, the initiative — setting benchmarks that spell out what students need to learn at each grade level, across the states — has become wildly controversial. As Education Next reported in an study co-written by Harvard Graduate School of Education Associate Professor Martin West, support for the Common Core declined noticeably between 2013 and 2014, threatening to undermine the baseline rationale of the project — that shared academic standards across states are a good idea, a notion that still wins wide support in principle.

As the issue threatens to become more polarizing, legislative and lobbying efforts are underway in states across the country to pause, review, or repeal the standards, their accompanying assessments, or both. Watch the entire video roundtable, or see excerpted segments below. The Root of the Problem A Bright New Era, or a Failing Strategy? Testing Boundaries. The Problems with the Common Core. This is a revised version of a talk on the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) delivered in Portland, Oregon, Sept. 20, 2013.

The CCSS have been adopted by 46 states and are currently being implemented in school districts throughout the United States. The trouble with the Common Core is not primarily what is in these standards or what's been left out, although that's certainly at issue. The bigger problem is the role the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) are playing in the larger dynamics of current school reform and education politics. Today everything about the Common Core, even the brand name—the Common Core State Standards—is contested because these standards were created as an instrument of contested policy. They have become part of a larger political project to remake public education in ways that go well beyond slogans about making sure every student graduates “college and career ready,” however that may be defined this year.

The Lure of the Common Core Who Created the Common Core? USJ EZ Proxy. Home. Race To The Top. Since 2008, the federal takeover of education has accelerated dramatically with the advent of President Obama’s Race to the Top program. That program foisted a set of national academic standards upon the states. Unfortunately, those standards suffer from severe academic deficiencies and their implementation diminishes parenthood, imposes a fiscal burden on the states, and establishes a governance precedent that is irreconcilable with our Founding. It is a federal takeover that will affect public school, private school, and home school children. Here’s how the program developed: From 2008 through 2010, the Gates Foundation and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation provided $35 million to a consortium of two non-government trade associations (the National Governors Association and the Council of Chief State School Officers) for purposes of developing and implementing a new education system in the United States.

Fact Sheet: The Race to the Top. Promoting Innovation, Reform, and Excellence in America’s Public Schools “America will not succeed in the 21st century unless we do a far better job of educating our sons and daughters… And the race starts today. I am issuing a challenge to our nation’s governors and school boards, principals and teachers, businesses and non-profits, parents and students: if you set and enforce rigorous and challenging standards and assessments; if you put outstanding teachers at the front of the classroom; if you turn around failing schools – your state can win a Race to the Top grant that will not only help students outcompete workers around the world, but let them fulfill their God-given potential.” - President Barack Obama July 24, 2009 Providing a high-quality education to every young American is vital to the health of our nation’s democracy and the strength of our nation’s economy.

In a 21st century world, education is no longer just a pathway to opportunity and success – it is a prerequisite. Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Tenth Amendment (Amendment X) to the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, was ratified on December 15, 1791.[1] It expresses the principle of federalism, which strictly supports the entire plan of the original Constitution of the United States of America, by stating that the federal government possesses only those powers delegated to it by the United States Constitution. All remaining powers are reserved for the states or the people. In drafting this amendment, its framers had two purposes in mind: first, as a necessary rule of construction; and second, as a reaffirmation of the nature of the federal system of freedom.[2][3] Text[edit] The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.[4] Drafting and adoption[edit] Judicial interpretation[edit] The amendment states but a truism that all is retained which has not been surrendered.

In Wickard v. Race to the Top Fund. Race to the Top Fund Race to the Top Phase Three Announcements, Applications, Application Review, Technical Assistance Race to the Top Phase Two Announcements, Applications, Scores and Comments, Application Review, Technical Assistance Race to the Top Phase One Announcements, Applications, Scores and Comments, Application Review, Technical Assistance FY 2011 Budget Request President Obama announced his plans to continue the Race to the Top challenge, requesting $1.35 billion for the program in his FY 2011 budget. For more information, please see the Executive Summary.

Program Office: Implementation and Support Unit (ISU) CFDA Number: 84.395 Program Type: Discretionary/Competitive Grants Through Race to the Top, we are asking States to advance reforms around four specific areas: Awards in Race to the Top will go to States that are leading the way with ambitious yet achievable plans for implementing coherent, compelling, and comprehensive education reform. Carol C. Burris. Carol Corbett Burris became Executive Director of the Network for Public Education Foundation in August 2015, after serving as principal of South Side High School in the Rockville Centre School District in NY since 2000. Prior to becoming a principal, she was a teacher at both the middle and high school level.

She received her doctorate from Teachers College, Columbia University, and her dissertation, which studied her district’s detracking reform in math, received the 2003 National Association of Secondary Schools’ Principals Middle Level Dissertation of the Year Award. In 2010, she was named Educator of the Year by the School Administrators Association of New York State, and in 2013, she was named SAANYS New York State High School Principal of the Year. Dr. E-mail Carol Burris at Resources: Essays - The Common Core Debate: National Standards Can’t Save Education – But Here’s What Can - Summit Ministries. The Common Core Debate: National Standards Can’t Save Education – But Here’s What Canby Aaron Zubia Americans are unhappy with K-12 education in the United States, and for good reason. Despite spending more on education than any other developed country in the world, American 15-year-olds rank 31st in math literacy and 23rd in science literacy.

Unless we intend to become a third-world country, we need ideas. And fast. But the latest idea — the Common Core State Standards Initiative — which has been adopted by 45 states and the District of Columbia, has stirred considerable debate and rousing opposition. Even though Common Core was launched in 2009 and has received ample media coverage, including serving as the brunt of jokes by well-known comedians, 61 percent of respondents to a recent Gallup poll reported that they knew little to nothing about it.(1) What Is Common Core? The concern advocates say drives Common Core, that American high school graduates are not college ready, is true. 1. Myths vs. Facts. Successful implementation of the Common Core State Standards requires parents, educators, policymakers, and other stakeholders to have the facts about what the standards are and what they are not.

The following myths and facts aim to address common misconceptions about the development, intent, content, and implementation of the standards. Myths About Content and Quality: General Myth: Adopting common standards means bringing all states’ standards down to the lowest common denominator. This means that states with high standards are actually taking a step backwards by adopting the Common Core. Fact: The standards are designed to build upon the most advanced current thinking about preparing all students for success in college, career, and life. This will result in moving even the best state standards to the next level. In fact, since this work began, there has been an explicit agreement that no state would lower its standards.

Myths About Content and Quality: Math Myths About Process. ​The debate over Common Core - Page 2. The core issue in education this brand new school year revolves around something called the Common Core. It's a prescription for teaching and grading students that's provoked an uncommonly spirited debate around the country.

Our Cover Story is reported by Jan Crawford: It's that familiar time again: Back to school. But something unfamiliar is happening in this fifth grade Florida classroom. It's a whole new approach to education. "Who is ready to stand up as a team and be a lawyer, and be a group of lawyers, and defend their case with this? " "Very often, the strategy is to have students talk about things with other students in the classroom; that's what happens in real life," said MaryEllen Elia, the superintendent of the Hillsborough County School District in Tampa, where K-12 learning is being transformed by a new set of high academic standards called the Common Core.

"The Common Core raises the bar for students' performance," Elia said. . © 2014 CBS Interactive Inc. Embrace The Common Core. Against The Motion Carol Burris Principal, South Side High School & Blogger, Washington Post’s “Answersheet” Carol Burris, Ed.D. has been the principal of South Side High School in Rockville Centre, New York since 2000. She was named the 2013 NASSP New York High School Principal of the Year and the 2010 New York State Outstanding Educator by the New York State School Administrators Association. In addition to leading her diverse suburban high school which is renowned for giving all students challenging curricula, Burris has authored or co-authored three books as well as numerous journal articles on equity and excellence in schools.

She is a staunch advocate of school and classroom desegregation. At the same time, she is an outspoken opponent of many of the Race to the Top reforms, including the Common Core. Learn more Frederick Hess Resident Scholar and Director of Educational Policy Studies, AEI An educator, political scientist and author, Frederick M. Learn more For The Motion Carmel Martin. Are the Common Core Standards a Good Idea? 45 states and the District of Columbia have adopted the Common Core State Standards for their public schools, a set of common curriculum guidelines promoted by the National Governors Association and the Obama administration, among others.

The standards, which are for math and language arts, are meant to “provide a consistent, clear understanding of what students are expected to learn, so teachers and parents know what they need to do to help them.” The Department of Education gave significant weight to adoption of Common Core when providing grants under the federal Race to the Top program. [SPECIAL REPORT: A Guide to Common Core] The standards were released in 2010, but have become controversial in recent weeks as states have moved into the implementation process. As U.S. Indiana has gone the furthest down this road, adopting a law that stops implementation of the standards entirely until further review. Connecticut Gov. But the standards still have their staunch defenders.