Press Release Strasbourg - European Parliament President Martin Schulz made the following statement after the vote by the European Parliament to reject the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA): European Parliament / The President : ACTA wrong solution to protect intellectual property
ACTA rejected by European Union vote European Parliament has rejected the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, by a heady 478 to 39, with 146 votes abstaining. While this doesn't mean ACTA can't become a reality elsewhere, it's a smack in the face for companies looking to crack down on internet-based copyright infringement. If ACTA had passed, its definition was so broad that it would mean the use of copyright images on websites could become an illegal act.
Declaration of Internet Freedom
The day before the EU's International Trade committee (INTA) recommended that the European Parliament should reject ACTA, the EU commissioner with responsibility for the treaty, Karel De Gucht, had given a speech to its members, trying to win them over. Although it was short, it turns out to be highly revealing about the European Commission's future ACTA strategy. Here's what he said: If you decide for a negative vote before the European Court rules, let me tell you that the Commission will nonetheless continue to pursue the current procedure before the Court, as we are entitled to do. A negative vote will not stop the proceedings before the Court of Justice. That is, whatever happens next week, the European Commission will wait for the European Court of Justice (ECJ) to rule on whether ACTA is compatible with EU law. EU Commissioner Reveals He Will Simply Ignore Any Rejection Of ACTA By European Parliament Next Week
Three heavyweight committees in the European Parliament gave their voting recommendations on ACTA today. All three gave the same recommendation: reject ACTA. This means that today, the European Parliament issued three very hard strikes against ACTA. What happened today was the first steps in a long chain that ends with the final vote in all of the European Parliament, which is the vote where ACTA ultimately lives or dies. Three Strikes Against ACTA In European Parliament Today
EU urged to reject international anti-counterfeiting pact | Amnesty International
ACTA and Fundamental Rights This page is experimental. We apologize for any technical problems that may occur. Disclaimer :Show The interpretation does not constitute an authentic record of proceedings. The simultaneous interpretation of debates provided by the European Parliament serves only to facilitate communication amongst the participants in the meeting.
Do you represent an SME? Do you currently do business with government? Do you want to do business with government? On Tuesday, 24th April between 3:30pm and 5:00pm, we need you. Update Thursday 19th April: Eventbrite registration is now open On Tuesday, 24th April, between 3:30pm and 5:00pm (venue details can be found below), we are asking representatives of SMEs to come and talk to us about the Open Standards consultation. Open Standards consultation needs you!
Brussels, March 27th 2012 - The EU Parliament refused to freeze the ACTA debate, and will not refer the agreement to the EU Court of Justice. In a 21 to 5 vote plus 2 abstentions, the Parliament decided to stick to its calendar and will vote on ACTA in June, as originally planned. The Commission's technocratic manoeuvres have not stopped the Parliament, and the door remains open to a swift rejection of ACTA. After an eventful process where a minority of pro-ACTA MEPs used procedural arguments to delay a decision, the EU Parliament's "International Trade" committee refused to refer ACTA to the EU Court of Justice. EU Parliament Will Vote on ACTA Without Delay!
EU Parliament Will Vote on ACTA Without Delay! Brussels, March 27th 2012 - The EU Parliament refused to freeze the ACTA debate, and will not refer the agreement to the EU Court of Justice. In a 21 to 5 vote plus 2 abstentions, the Parliament decided to stick to its calendar and will vote on ACTA in June, as originally planned. The Commission's technocratic manoeuvres have not stopped the Parliament, and the door remains open to a swift rejection of ACTA. After an eventful process where a minority of pro-ACTA MEPs used procedural arguments to delay a decision, the EU Parliament's "International Trade" committee refused to refer ACTA to the EU Court of Justice. Such a referral would have delayed for 18 months the final vote on ACTA.
INTA - ACTA assessment.pdf
How the European internet rose up against Acta Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland sent a letter to his fellow leaders in the EU Friday urging them to reject Acta, reversing Poland's course with the controversial intellectual-property treaty, and possibly taking Europe with them. "I was wrong," Tusk explained to a news conference, confessing his government had acted recklessly with a legal regime that wasn't right for the 21st century. The reversal came after Tusk's own strong statements in support of Acta and condemnation of Anonymous attacks on Polish government sites, and weeks of street protest in Poland and across Europe. The seeming overnight success came after both years of work by European NGOs, and the spark of the Sopa/Pipa protests in America (which included Wired.com).
How the European Internet Rose Up Against ACTA | Threat Level Prime Minister Donald Tusk of Poland sent a letter to his fellow leaders in the EU Friday urging them to reject ACTA, reversing Poland’s course with the controversial intellectual-property treaty, and possibly taking Europe with them. “I was wrong,” Tusk explained to a news conference, confessing his government had acted recklessly with a legal regime that wasn’t right for the 21st century. The reversal came after Tusk’s own strong statements in support of ACTA and condemnation of Anonymous attacks on Polish government sites, and weeks of street protest in Poland and across Europe. The seeming overnight success came after both years of work by European NGOs, and the spark of the SOPA/PIPA protests in America (which included Wired.com).
ACTA Protest / Anonymous Sweden
ACTA Update VI Subscribe to this blog About Author Glyn Moody's look at all levels of the enterprise open source stack. The blog will look at the organisations that are embracing open source, old and new alike (start-ups welcome), and the communities of users and developers that have formed around them (or not, as the case may be). Contact Author Email Glyn
media representative urges European Parliament to reassess ACTA to safeguard freedom of expression - Representative on Freedom of the Media
Press/Blog | Access
Stop ACTA & TPP! - Never use trade agreements to mess with the Internet!
Acta is the latest copyright enforcement scheme to cause alarm among digital activists. Given its reach, this is understandable. The anti-counterfeiting trade agreement is, despite its name, effectively an international treaty that forces signatories to criminalise "commercial-scale" copyright and trademark infringement. Some of it covers knock-off merchandise, but most applies to the digital world as well. Act on Acta now if you care about democracy and free speech | David Meyer | Comment is free
European Commission : Trade : ACTA - Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement Protection and enforcement of intellectual property are crucial for the EU's ability to stimulate innovation and to compete in the global economy. Intellectual property rights (IPRs) (such as patents, trademarks, designs, copyrights or geographical indications) enable European inventors, creators and businesses to prevent unauthorized exploitation of their creations, and in return to get compensation for their investment. IPRs also offer guarantees to users (e.g., trademarks and geographical indications identify the origin of the goods concerned). Read more on the benefits of IP rights Trade and intellectual property in a nutshell IPR support creativity and innovation.
Act on ACTA refers to a European Parliament Trade Committee commissioned study on ACTA (pdf). The study highlights problematic aspects of ACTA and makes recommendations (see below). According to the study, “unconditional consent would be an inappropriate response”, and “There does not therefore appear to be any immediate benefit from ACTA for EU citizens”. The study confirms ACTA goes beyond current EU legislation. It recommends asking the European Court of Justice an opinion on ACTA. European Parliament ACTA study
I’ll be Tweet-chatting next Monday, 30 January « Digital Agenda Commissioner – Neelie Kroes
European Union - Google+ - ACTA - Anti-counterfeiting Trade Agreement What is ACTA? …
Bastille 2 | Bastille
How to act against ACTA - La Quadrature du Net
Thousands march in Poland over Acta internet treaty
Österreich unterzeichnet ACTA am Donnerstag
ACTA and HR 1981 are the Next Major Privacy Threats
What's Wrong with ACTA Week
Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement
EU Council Quietly Adopts ACTA, By Hiding It In An Agriculture And Fisheries Meeting
Last Parliament Standing: Europe Final Stronghold Of ACTA Critics
Exclusive - Lawrence Lessig Extended Interview Pt. 1 - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - 12/13
Lobbying’s Hidden Influence
The Privatization of Copyright Lawmaking
Say NO to ACTA
acta-cemetery.jpg (JPEG Image, 6753x512 pixels) - Scaled (14%)
Multilateral anti-counterfeiting trade accord signed in Tokyo
ACTA signed – EU deaf-mute
Will ACTA Be Killed in the EU?
Samstag wird ACTA beschlossen » Von markus » netzpolitik.org
supports an ECJ opinion on ACTA
Deck.ly post by clarinette « TweetDeck
IP Policy Committee blog » Blog Archive » Leak: How EU prepares next ACTA “technical round”