Rogue landlords making life unbearable for tenants, says Shelter. More than 125,000 people privately renting homes in England have suffered abusive behaviour from landlords in the last year, according to Shelter. The housing charity is warning that a small minority of rogue landlords are making life "unbearable" for tenants, with some seeing their belongings burned and others having utilities cut off in efforts to intimidate them. Shelter said that in the last year, almost 17,000 people have called its helpline about problems with a landlord. The charity highlighted the case of a man named Chris, who said a rented flat where he lived with his wife had damp and a leaking roof. Chris said his landlord failed to carry out some repairs and started entering his home without permission. Chris said: " Then one day he became really aggressive and hurled some stones at me. We both just felt so frightened. " Helpline adviser Mark Cook said: "Every day at Shelter we speak to people desperate for help because their lives are being made unbearable by a rogue landlord.
The-cost-of-school-holidays.pdf. Labour’s four leadership contenders show contrasting views on disability benefits | DisabledGo News and Blog. When poor people can’t get on due to lack of public transport | Society. If I mention using buses or the LA metro to get around in the city, the reaction from friends and acquaintances will be something like: “Wow, you use public transport?” Or in jest: “There’s a metro?” In a city notorious for its car-dependency and clogged freeways, this reflects how people value their cars and are correspondingly reluctant to use public transport, but beneath the surface there’s something else going on. When you use public transport in LA, it is impossible not to notice that unlike say, London’s tube or some other US cities’ provision, it’s not so much a network as a patchy attempt at one, which is overwhelmingly occupied by people on low incomes and the working poor. What is also evident is that, imperfect as it may be, buses and the underground nevertheless provide a vital artery to what society offers beyond poorer parts of town.
LA is one of many US cities currently confronting the impact of deficient public transport. England divided | Londonmapper. New research shows: England is now more divided than 1980s • 60% increase in number of poor households and 33% increase in wealthy households between 1980 and 2010 • Households in the middle are disappearing, with biggest changes in London New analysis of Census data by the University of Oxford, funded by independent charity Trust for London, shows England has experienced significant changes in the composition of its households during the three decades running from 1980-2010. There has been an increase in the number of poor households, an increase in wealthy households and a squeeze on the middle. The most dramatic changes have been in London with a 43% decrease in the number of households in the middle. Analysis of the Census by Professor Danny Dorling and Dr Benjamin Hennig, shows that in England from 1980 to 2010 there was a: • 60% increase in poor households (from 17% to 27%) • 27% decrease in middle households (from 66% to 48%) • 33% increase in wealthy households (from 18 to 24%)
Agent orange sur Twitter : "1.6m #children live in severe #poverty UK 63% in poverty in a family where someone works #austerity a #tory con. Charity: no substitute for justice. Imagine if all the foodbanks in the UK closed tomorrow. The result would be pretty dreadful. Shoplifting for food, already on the rise, would no doubt increase further. Hospital admissions due to malnutrition and related illnesses would surely increase even more, as would begging.
Some people, like diabetic David Clapson, would simply die quietly at home, in a house with no food. These are the consequences of welfare reform and an increasingly draconian benefits system, where people who are too ill or disabled to work can have their income stopped for missing an appointment at the Jobcentre. People really are dying and suffering immensely, but their stories, for some reason, rarely make national headlines. So we have to be grateful for the foodbanks, which are the last line of defence against hunger, and grateful for the people who generously give up their time, or donate food and money, to ensure that in the UK in the 21st century, people don’t starve in larger numbers. Tories under fire for not targeting child poverty - UK Politics - UK - The Independent. The Government’s watchdog on poverty estimates that the number of children growing up in poor families will rise from 2.6m to 3.5m in 2020 – the date by which the three main political parties have pledged to eradicate it.
However, the Commission on Social Mobility and Child Poverty believes the rise will be even greater because the 3.5m estimate does not take account of the further austerity measures planned after next May’s general election. That means it could be over 4m by 2020. The Tories have pledged to freeze most working age benefits, including tax credits, for two years from 2016 but that would contribute only £3.2bn towards their £12bn planned welfare cuts.
Alan Milburn, the commission chairman, appealed to all three main Westminster parties to be more honest with the voters by admitting the 2020 target for ending child poverty would be missed and to replace it with a set of more realistic goals. Rural poverty: when the food bank is only 20 miles away... | Society. Long way for a food parcel: A man walks across snow-covered fields on the North Yorkshire moors. Photograph: Anna Gowthorpe/PA As the Archbishop of York, John Sentamu, suggested in a powerful speech this week, the "new and terrible blight" of food poverty in the UK is not the sole preserve of gritty urban neighbourhoods. He highlighted his own neck of the woods, North Yorkshire, the home of rolling dales and affluent, pretty market towns, as a case in point. Sentamu referred in passing to a recent survey of food poverty in the area.
It is well worth a read. Geographically-isolated low income families, it shows, are at high risk of food poverty. Demand for food aid is rising, like everywhere else, but North Yorkshire's rural fastness presents special challenges. Families in poverty were consuming nutritionally-poor food such as takeaways and frozen food because healthier options were to expensive it found. The report notes: The profile of the clients was changing too. The harsh lives of the forgotten rural poor | Tobias Jones | Comment is free | The Observer. A green and pleasant land, unless you're caught in the trap of rural poverty.
Photograph: NTPL/John Miller It's hard to imagine a time in which it's been tougher to live in the countryside. It's not just a question of the usual complaints: that access to services – transport, hospitals, schools, even mobile phone coverage or broadband – is patchy. It's not just the fact that the countryside is suddenly vulnerable to all sorts of diseases: to ash dieback, to bovine TB and the Schmallenberg virus. It's that there's acute poverty in rural areas and it's a poverty that is seemingly invisible. At least one-quarter of all farming families live on or below the official poverty line and, as the Observer reports today, many endured a rough 2012. Farming used to be a communal activity, involving dozens of people sharing the highs and lows. There are many areas of the rural economy not involved in farming.
There are many reasons for the invisibility of the rural poor. When did being lowly paid become a criminal offence? | Zoe Williams. Inside Amazon's flagship factory in Rugeley, Staffordshire, a new way of working is evolving. There is a strong topnote of distrust, evinced by the full-body scanners that workers have to pass, every time they leave, to prove they haven't stolen anything. The profound insecurity built into the employment model is dressed up as discipline – which is to say, Amazon expects huge seasonal fluctuations in the number of people it needs, yet likes to mask their dismissals behind a misdeameanour, so a lot of people get axed for crimes like being ill.
There's a lifesized blonde lady made of cardboard at the entrance, with a think bubble coming out of her head that says, "This is the best job I've ever had! " If that detail alone is enough to make your blood run cold, marry it to the testimony of the chairman of nearby Lea Hall Miners Welfare Centre and Social Club: "The feedback we're getting is that it's like being in a slave camp. " But there is innovation here, in a new shamelessness. Child poverty ‘should be tackled not measured’ Why aren't we more outraged about child poverty? In a hall in East London, the Reverend Giles Fraser, formerly of St Paul’s Cathedral and now of St Mary’s, Newington, has a question for a small group of local teenagers, all aged around 15 or 16.
“Fifty-two per cent of children in this borough live in poverty. What do you think is the average salary of people who work here?” He asks. The guesses range from £10,000 to £18,000. “All wrong,” he replies. Fraser’s been asked by the local council to find out what local children think is fair and unfair about the borough. . - They think that when they put their address on their CV, it makes potential employers less likely to consider them, and that’s not fair. . - They don’t think it’s fair that old people in Tower Hamlets have to live in bad housing association accommodation.
. - They don’t think it’s fair that other kids in London boroughs have more facilities, parks and open spaces. . - They don’t think it’s fair that their streets are scary. Listening to troubled families - Publications. Language is a weapon used to make ‘others’ of people in poverty. Are we being tough on people in poverty and not looking closely enough at its causes? Some journalists still use shorthand. It’s really handy. Some politicians use shorthand. It’s really dangerous.
Language, as a tool, is never neutral. In the current debate on welfare reform, people in poverty are casually labelled as economic burdens, or even bereft of morals. Lest readers see this blog as the ramblings of a soft liberal-type: waste and fraud is wrong and those who allow waste and commit crimes should be held to account. So let’s keep calm, provide the evidence and tell the story of those ‘hard-working families’ (thought I’d borrow that phrase from the Politicians’ Book of Clichés) struggling with their daily lives.
Seventy years on from the Beveridge Report, little appears to have changed in how we describe some of our fellow citizens – a theme to be developed by my boss, Julia Unwin, in her Toynbee Hall lecture later this month.