Philosophy

TwitterFacebook
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Epistemology ( i / ɨ ˌ p ɪ s t ɨ ˈ m ɒ l ə dʒ i / from Greek ἐπιστήμη - epistēmē , meaning "knowledge, understanding", and λόγος - logos , meaning "study of") is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge . [ 1 ] [ 2 ] It questions what knowledge is, how it is acquired, and the possible extent to which a given subject or entity can be known. Much of the debate in this field has focused on analyzing the nature of knowledge and how it relates to connected notions such as truth , belief , and justification . The term was introduced by the Scottish philosopher James Frederick Ferrier (1808–1864). [ 3 ] The field is sometimes referred to as the theory of knowledge . [ edit ] Knowledge

Epistemology

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology

Homonym

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homonym Als Homonym bezeichnet man ein Wort , das für verschiedene Begriffe oder unterschiedliche Einzeldinge steht. [1] Vor allem in der Philosophie spricht man auch von Äquivokation .
Philosophy Wiki

'What is a human being, then?' 'A seed.' 'A... seed?' 'An acorn that is unafraid to destroy itself in growing into a tree' David Zindell, The Broken God Transhumanism is a philosophy that humanity can, and should, strive to higher levels, both physically, mentally and socially. It encourages research into such areas as life extension , cryonics , nanotechnology , physical and mental enhancements, uploading human consciousness into computers and megascale engineering . http://www.aleph.se/Trans/

Anders Transhuman Page

This is yet another topic that I have put off for far to long. Initially, I wanted to make a youtube video on the topic, but it never came to be, so here it comes in written form, which is probably better anyway. It's going to be a long ride, please bear with me. http://tantrasoul.blogspot.com/2012/08/the-munchhausen-trilemma-first-cause.html

Skeptic Tantrika: The Münchhausen Trilemma, the First Cause and the Infinite Regress

You cannot fully describe a glass. Go ahead, try it! You can describe how it looks, how it feels. You can, at least theoretically, describe its history, who created it and when, who drank from it. You can describe its length, width, height, temperature, refraction rate, transparency, and a gazillion other factors. And yet, you haven't fully described it. http://tantrasoul.blogspot.com/2012/04/words.html

Words