Blog 1. Collaborative-filtering. Economics 1. Blog 2. Economics 2. The Wisdom of Crowds Prevents People’s Passions | Tyner Blain. The wisdom of crowds helps us avoid stupid decisions. Unfortunately, it also prevents innovative, passionate, fantastic decisions. Collective Intelligence is collective insipidness. We need to keep the inputs of individuals in the mix. Collective Intelligence Collective intelligence is the notion that a group of individuals will be smarter than a single individual. Design By Committee Since we’re breaking out the old saws, we should acknowledge that people also have known for a long time that design by committee is a bad idea.
Eliciting and managing requirements requires communication, and prioritization. Brainstorming involves collaboration in the requirements gathering phase of a project. Prioritization also involves collaboration. No matter what, I believe that in our quest to exploit the “We” in Web, we must not sacrifice the “I” in Internet. So how do we avoid the dillutive effects of the crowd’s concensus? Dictators Dodge Dillution One way is to follow apple’s model – have a dictator.
Swarm Behavior. The decisive moment didn't take place in the main cluster of bees, but out at the boxes, where scouts were building up. As soon as the number of scouts visible near the entrance to a box reached about 15—a threshold confirmed by other experiments—the bees at that box sensed that a quorum had been reached, and they returned to the swarm with the news.
"It was a race," Seeley says. "Which site was going to build up 15 bees first? " Scouts from the chosen box then spread through the swarm, signaling that it was time to move. Once all the bees had warmed up, they lifted off for their new home, which, to no one's surprise, turned out to be the best of the five boxes. The bees' rules for decision-making—seek a diversity of options, encourage a free competition among ideas, and use an effective mechanism to narrow choices—so impressed Seeley that he now uses them at Cornell as chairman of his department. "I've applied what I've learned from the bees to run faculty meetings," he says. Stephen Buckley on Technology, Collective Intelligence, and Open. People right now don’t quite know what the secret sauce is for connecting people and computers in ways that at least seem to be intelligent.
Some people think that collective intelligence is some kind of magic pixie dust that you can sprinkle on top of any kind of a situation or problem, and it will automatically solve it. Then there are other people that criticize collective intelligence efforts, for example, like Wikipedia , because it’s not perfect, and therefore they believe that the only way to do things, organizationally, is through a centralized command and control structure. Both schools of thought are probably equally wrong. There are some instances, some problems that can be solved better collectively than they can, individually, and then there are those problems that lend themselves to a more traditional organizational structure. We think that something fundamental has changed in the past couple of years, in the way that people are using computers. Electronic Democracy for the Web.
The "Dumbness of Crowds" « Female-friendly tech shirts | Main | Reverse-engineering user reviews » The "Dumbness of Crowds" Community. Wisdom of Crowds. Collective Intelligence. The new emphasis on net-enabled collaboration is all goodness and light until somebody gets an eye I poked out. Is it merely a coincidence that Apple, run by (as James Gosling put it) "a dictator with good taste" leads the way in tech design, while risk-averse companies using design-by-committee (or consensus) are churning out bland, me-too, incremental tweaks to existing products? Jaron Lanier, in his controversial Edge essay Digital Maoism, has a great quote: "In the last year or two the trend has been to remove the scent of people...
" All geeks-and-personal-hygiene-jokes aside, we need the smell. By "crowd,", I think he meant "more people", sure, but he also defined a big ol' set of constraints for how much togetherness people can have before the results became dumber. Art isn't made by committee. Great design isn't made by consensus. 039;s 2006 Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle Highlights Key Techn. Egham, UK, August 9, 2006 View All Press Releases Web 2.0 technologies and business models dominate emerging technologies together with Real World Web and Applications Architecture Gartner, Inc., today announced its 2006 Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle which assesses the maturity, impact and adoption speed of 36 key technologies and trends during the next ten years.
This year’s hype cycle highlights three major themes that are experiencing significant activity and which include new or heavily hyped technologies, where organisations may be uncertain as to which will have most impact on their business. The three key technology themes identified by Gartner, and the corresponding technologies for enterprises to examine closely within them, are: 1. Web 2.0 represents a broad collection of recent trends in Internet technologies and business models.
Ajax is also rated as high impact and capable of reaching maturity in less than two years. 2. 3. 2006 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies 1. 2. 3. Confessions of an Aca/Fan: The Official Weblog of Henry Jenkins: Is Collective Intelligence Like Individual Intelligence? - Evolv. The Co-Intelligence Institute. Mathematical "truth serum" promotes honesty - 14 Octob. Few questions come with a clear-cut "right" answer, a solution as clear as the difference between black and white.
Speculating on the future, making inferences about the past, and judging the present all involve a seemingly endless palette of greys. But eliciting truthful responses from people - who give subjective answers - is crucial to the surveys and expert analyses that determine government and financial policies. Finding out if someone is answering a question truthfully is a murky process, often inaccessible to the questioner - sometimes even the person answering cannot be sure. Now, Drazen Prelec, a psychologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, US, has devised a scoring system, or "Bayesian truth serum" to encourage people to divulge their honest opinions.
The method relies on asking questions in pairs and analysing the relationship between the answers in a so-called Bayesian approach - which assumes that the answers are interlinked. Conventional wisdom. Voice of humanity homepage. Sthe : Kollektiv intelligens - eller når Wikis bliver til bøger. Forlaget Pearson Education, der laver kursusbøger, har kastet sig ud i et interessant projekt, der sætter fokus på mulighederne i web 2.0. Under arbejdstitlen "Vi er smartere end mig" (We are smarter than me) vil de efter sigende producere en bog til erhvervslivet baseret på wikis-input via fra mere end en million akademikere og forretningsfolk.
Bogen skal handle om, hvordan communities, social networks og andre web 2.0-værktøjer influerer på- og kan gavne erhvervslivet - og man kan frit melde sig som forfatter, hvis man føler sig kvalificeret. Projektet er i mine øjne en genial udnyttelse af den kollektive intelligens, som internettet netop giver os mulighed for at udnytte.
Viden og erfaringer fra en million mennesker må jo unægteligt kunne gøre en forskel, når man skal lave en bog. Og at inddrage så mange røster i researchen er jo kun mulig på grund af de mange instrumenter og foraer for debat, vidensudveksling og -indsamling (f.eks. Smartocracy Weblog. Group mind (science fiction) - Wikipedia, A group mind, hive mind, mind coalescence or group ego in science fiction is a single, collective consciousness or intelligence occupying many bodies or entities. Its use in literature goes back at least as far as Olaf Stapledon's science fiction novel Last and First Men (1930).[1][2] A group mind might be formed by telepathy, by adding brain-to-brain communication to ordinary individuals, or by some unspecified means.
This term may be used interchangeably with "hive mind". A hive mind is a group mind with almost complete loss (or lack) of individual identity; most fictional group minds are hives. The concept of the group or hive mind is an intelligent version of real-life superorganisms such as an ant colony or beehive, and consequently, insectoid aliens such as Zerg and Ceph often have such a mind.
The Akatsuki leader Pain in the manga Naruto has six bodies that share the same mind. Blog of Collective Intelligence: Who want. Two vitrioloc attacks in three days, that’s how the conservative extremist of The Register welcomed MIT’s Center for Collective Intelligence. On Oct. 11, Andrew Orlowksi wrote in his aerticle under the title “MIT opens Junk Science Institute:” “MIT’s Badger School already has a book project in mind – insultingly titled We Are Smarter Than Me – and you may be the next victim of the revolution.”
Fortunately, MIT is in good company if we consider all those who are Orlowski’s target in the same article: Wikipedia, Google, Linux and Deming’s. Then, two days later, here he came again: “MIT’s news Center for Collective Intelligence faces an uphill battle getting its cosmic crap turned into viable management consultancy.” In his effort to insinuate the field, he goes on: “The Soviet Union, China’s cultural revolution, Cambodia’s killing fields and Nazism are all the result of a collective mind.” Could somebody tell me what is the “pink oboe” so that I don’t touch it even by accident? Like this: Solve any dispute by vote. Welcome to Principia Cybernetica Web.
Smartocracy: voter. Smart Mob. UnityCenter: CollectiveIntelligence. Copyright © 1999-2012 GoDaddy.com, LLC. All rights reserved. *One FREE .COM, .CO, .NET or .ORG with purchase of a new 12-, 24- or 36-month website builder plan. Plus ICANN fee of $0.18 per domain name per year. You must add the domain name into your cart before purchase, and you must select a domain term length equal to or less than the term length of your website builder plan to qualify for the free domain offer. If you purchase a domain name for a term longer than the term of the website builder plan, you will be charged for the additional registration term at the then-current rate.
Cannot be used in conjunction with any other offer, sale, discount or promotion. . + New .COMs $7.99/yr plus 18 cents/yr ICANN fee. Collective Intelligence: What Is Enlighten. Collective intelligence - Wikipedia, the f. Types of collective intelligence Collective intelligence is shared or group intelligence that emerges from the collaboration, collective efforts, and competition of many individuals and appears in consensus decision making. The term appears in sociobiology, political science and in context of mass peer review and crowdsourcing applications. It may involve consensus, social capital and formalisms such as voting systems, social media and other means of quantifying mass activity. Collective IQ is a measure of collective intelligence, although it is often used interchangeably with the term collective intelligence. Collective intelligence strongly contributes to the shift of knowledge and power from the individual to the collective.
History[edit] Dimensions[edit] Howard Bloom has discussed mass behavior—collective behavior from the level of quarks to the level of bacterial, plant, animal, and human societies. Openness Peering Sharing Acting Globally Examples[edit] Mathematical techniques[edit] Symbiotic intelligence. Symbiotic Intelligence Project: Main Page. The Social Superorganism and its Global Brain. On Emergence and Explanation. 1. Introduction: To explain Living as cognitive beings in a world of stability and change, we permanently face known and unknown situations, old and new phenomena - conversations, happenings, shifting perceptual patterns of the world, but not often true chaos, nor strict regularity.
We usually cope with the complexity of ordinary life in a way so easy and by such seemingly simple patterns of behaviour - when seen from the higher level description of ordinary language (or `folk psychology') - that it is astonishing to realize the underlying complexity of this `problem solving behaviour' from a scientific point of view, i.e., when we try to relate descriptions of the body as a complex system and its environment (as given by physics, biology and cognitive science) to the life and actions (as experienced) of our daily world.
What does it mean to understand something? In the sciences, understanding is related to - or even equated with - the notion of explanation. 2. Let . Examples: 1. 2. 3. 4. Welcome to Direct Democracy Portal. Smartocracy: voters. Smartocracy - proposal. Proposal for a “decision network”, an internet-enabled meritocratic social network for collective decision-making [This proposal was funded by Threshold Foundation (www.thresholdfoundation.org ) and Wallace Global Fund (www.wgf.org ), was developed and tested in early 2006. We are currently exploring collaborations with other collective-decisionmaking initiatives, and have some development funding.] "Democracy is the worst form of government except all the others. " - Winston Churchill Until now, that is. The Internet presents fantastic opportunities for collective decision-making that can re-energize civic participation, by solving a core problem of democracy, namely that one-person/one-vote guarantees that the wisest among us will be devalued.
We propose a simple but powerful new way to make collective decisions of all kinds meritocratically, using new Internet social-networking tools. That is because the most highly respected participants get delegated the most votes. Proposal How Who a. What Is Collective Intelligence? - Robin Good's Latest News. Business 2.0: 50 People Who Matter. The Top Pickers vs. the Pack - washingtonpost.com.
James Acevedo is a "genius," though he admits no one at the elementary school in Ridgewood, N.J., where he teaches third grade, knows it. But the Web site where he competes nightly, PicksPal.com, was so taken by his record at forecasting sporting events that it included him last month in a newly compiled list of 30 super-achievers culled from about 100,000 members and began selling their "genius picks" to the public. "It's sort of self-gratifying to find that there's actually something to my gut feeling," said Acevedo, 26. This new feature places PicksPal among a small number of Web sites seeking to turn the wisdom of the Internet on its head by sifting through its vast number of users to identify a handful of experts. If this novel approach withstands scrutiny, the reverberations could extend well beyond sports betting to include stock trading, popular culture and other realms. This group wisdom, for instance, underpins the link-analysis formula Google Inc. uses to rank search results.
Stupid Whispers. Swarm Intelligence: An Interview with Eric Bonabeau. By Derrick Story 02/21/2003 Eric Bonabeau, Ph.D, a keynote speaker at the upcoming Emerging Technology conference, is a leader in the field of swarm intelligence and has focused on applying these concepts to real world problems such as factory scheduling and telecommunications routing. The concept itself is borrowed from nature; in this interview, that's where the conversation begins, with ants and other social insects. Dr. Bonabeau takes us from his childhood nightmares of carnivorous wasps to applying the theories of swarm intelligence to solving real problems in the business world.
Derrick Story:Eric, thanks for taking a few moments to talk with us. Eric Bonabeau: My pleasure. DS: Before we start discussing swarm intelligence specifically, and how it can save companies millions of dollars, could you tell us a little bit about past events that pointed you in this direction of research? EB: As a kid I'd always been terrified of insects. DS: That story brings two things to mind.
Massively distributed collaboration - Wikipedia, the free encycl. Open Source Intelligence. Open Source Intelligence. Social Synergy. Context Spring 1999 Issue -- Digital Strategy Supplement: Reed&#