background preloader

Folksonomy

Folksonomy
An empirical analysis of the complex dynamics of tagging systems, published in 2007,[8] has shown that consensus around stable distributions and shared vocabularies does emerge, even in the absence of a central controlled vocabulary. For content to be searchable, it should be categorized and grouped. While this was believed to require commonly agreed on sets of content describing tags (much like keywords of a journal article), recent research has found that, in large folksonomies, common structures also emerge on the level of categorizations.[9] Accordingly, it is possible to devise mathematical models of collaborative tagging that allow for translating from personal tag vocabularies (personomies) to the vocabulary shared by most users.[10] Origin[edit] Folksonomy is a type of collaborative tagging system in which the classification of data is done by users. There are two different groups of folksonomies. Semantic Web[edit] Library Catalogs[edit] Folksontology[edit] See also[edit] Related:  SOCIAL BOOKMARKING & Related ConceptsSaved Wiki

Taxonomy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Taxonomy may refer to: Science[edit] In business and economics[edit] In education[edit] Bloom's taxonomy, a standardized categorization of learning objectives in an educational contextClassification of Instructional Programs, a taxonomy of academic disciplines at institutions of higher education in the United StatesSOLO Taxonomy, Structure of Observed Learning Outcome, proposed by Biggs and Collis Information and computer science[edit] ACM Computing Classification System, a subject classification system for computing devised by the Association for Computing MachineryXBRL Taxonomy, eXtensible Business Reporting LanguageSRK taxonomy, in workplace user-interface design Safety taxonomy[edit] Other[edit] See also[edit]

Définition par Olivier Le Deuff (BBF) Le terme de folksonomie est apparu récemment sur le web pour désigner le phénomène d’indexation des documents numériques par l’usager. On rencontre également fréquemment le mot tag qui désigne en quelque sorte un mot-clé. Le terme de folknologie est aussi employé, mais plus rarement. L’usage du mot folksonomie semble donc plus opportun. Ce phénomène ne cesse de prendre de l’ampleur avec l’avènement des nouvelles technologies du web, dites « web 2.0 », qui donnent plus de possibilités d’expression à l’internaute. Le phénomène est-il durable ou n’est-ce qu’un effet de mode ? Caractéristiques Les folksonomies constituent la possibilité pour l’usager d’indexer des documents afin qu’il puisse plus aisément les retrouver grâce à un système de mots-clés. Le paradoxe vient sans doute du fait qu’un esprit collaboratif marque le fonctionnement des systèmes dits de tags comme le fameux Technorati, l’un des plus importants moteurs d’indexation de blogs. Deux types de folksonomies Critiques et débats

Forge (software) For software developers it is a place to host, among others, source code (often version-controlled), bug database and documentation for their projects. For users, a forge is a repository of computer applications. Software forges have become popular, and have proven successful as a software development model for a large number of software projects. The term forge refers to a common prefix or suffix adopted by various platforms created after the example of SourceForge (such as GForge and FusionForge). This usage of the word stems from the metalworking forge, used for shaping metal parts. Two different kinds of concepts are commonly referred to by the term forge: a service offered on a Web platform to host software development projects;an integrated set of software elements which produce such platforms, ready for deployment. All these platforms provide similar tools helpful to software developers working in the hosted projects: Some provide other features as well: code review CloudForge

Social bookmarking Common features[edit] In a social bookmarking system, users save links to web pages that they want to remember and/or share. These bookmarks are usually public, and can be saved privately, shared only with specified people or groups, shared only inside certain networks, or another combination of public and private domains. The allowed people can usually view these bookmarks chronologically, by category or tags, or via a search engine. Many social bookmarking services provide web feeds for their lists of bookmarks, including lists organized by tags. As these services have matured and grown more popular, they have added extra features such as ratings and comments on bookmarks, the ability to import and export bookmarks from browsers, emailing of bookmarks, web annotation, and groups or other social network features.[4] History[edit] A user page on del.icio.us in May 2004, displaying bookmarks with tags. Folksonomy[edit] Uses[edit] Enterprise bookmarking[edit] Libraries[edit] Education[edit]

les logiques documentaires qui permettent à la médiasphère de s’inscrire dans une logique semblable à celle de l’archive foucal Olivier Ertzscheid. Maître de Conférences. Université de Nantes. IUT de la Roche sur Yon. Equipe CREC. Laboratoire DOCSI (Université de Lyon). olivier.ertzscheid@univ-nantes.fr Gabriel Gallezot Maître de Conférences Université de Nice - Sophia Antipolis Urfist PacaC Laboratoire I3M (EA 3820) gallezot@unice.fr Le phénomène que nous voulons ici analyser concerne le document à l’échelle de son déploiement sur les réseaux : en changeant d’échelle, il change nécessairement de nature. La problématique documentaire à l’échelle des micro-réseaux (Intranets) comme des macro-réseaux (Internet) s’est aujourd’hui presqu’entièrement focalisée sur les deux questions que sont d’une part, le traitement de masses et de corpus documentaires inédits dans leur forme (formats) et dans leur taille (volumétrie), et d’autre part la question de la recherche et de l’accès pertinent et/ou raisonné auxdits documents. b) -2- Hypothèses c)3 - MethodesMéthodes d)4 – Discussions 1.1 : Continents documentaires.

Four Square Writing Method The Four Square Writing Method is a way for teaching writing to children in school. While primarily used to teach persuasive writing, it has also been used to help teach deconstruction.[1] The method was developed by Judith S. Gould [2] and Evan Jay Gould.[3] It was developed initially for primary school students, but it has also been used in high school classes. Method[edit] A colour-coded example of a Four Square Writing Method layout. The method is primarily a visual framework for assisting students with formulating ideas in an organized manner prior to writing an essay. The concept generally works as follows: Variations of the above rules may require more or less development in each of the rectangles, depending on the grade-level or maturity of the student. Results[edit] Results show a consistent increase in the ability of students to write persuasively. Kingsley Elementary School in Kingsport, Tennessee also tested the Four Square Writing Method. Four Square Series[edit] References[edit]

Folksonomy :: vanderwal.net This page is a static permanent web document. It has been written to provide a place to cite the coinage of folksonomy. This is response the request from many in the academic community to document the circumstances and date of the creation of the term folksonomy. The definition at creation is also part of this document. This document pulls together bits of conversations and ideas I wrote regarding folksonomy on listserves, e-mail, in my blogs and in blog comments on other's sites in 2004. Background I have been a fan of ad hoc labeling and tagging systems since at least the late 1980s after watching a co-worker work his magic with Lotus Magellan (he would add his own ad hoc keywords or tags to the documents on his hard drive, paying particular attention to add these tags to documents others created so to add his context). In 2003 del.icio.us was started by Joshua Schacter and it included identity in its social bookmarking. Creation of Folksonomy Term Definition of Folksonomy

blog, folksonomie, partage de signets, réseau social, Web 2.0, wiki... — éduscol, le site des professionnels de l'éducation Office québécois de la langue française Définition « Pratique qui permet de sauvegarder ses signets sur Internet, de leur attribuer des mots-clés pour en faciliter la recherche et de les partager avec une communauté d'internautes. » Équivalent anglaissocial bookmarking Synonymes partage de favoris, partage de marque-pages Terme(s) à éviter bookmarking social, social bookmarking Notes « Le partage de signets permet aux internautes inscrits en ligne d'accéder à leurs sites préférés depuis n'importe quel ordinateur, c'est-à-dire depuis n'importe quel lieu de connexion à Internet (travail, domicile, cybercafé, hôtel, etc.). Le terme favori, utilisé surtout au pluriel, a été retenu par Microsoft pour désigner les signets du navigateur Internet Explorer.Le terme marque-page, moins répandu, est surtout utilisé avec le navigateur Firefox de Mozilla. [Office québécois de la langue française, 2008] Grand dictionnaire terminologique de la langue française Michèle Drechsler Définition Voir : bibliographie

Fragment identifier The fragment identifier introduced by a hash mark # is the optional last part of a URL for a document. It is typically used to identify a portion of that document. The generic syntax is specified in RFC 3986. The hash-mark separator in URIs is not part of the fragment identifier. Basics[edit] In URIs, a hash mark # introduces the optional fragment near the end of the URL. A URI ending with # is permitted by the generic syntax and is a kind of empty fragment. Examples[edit] In URIs for MIME text/html pages such as the fragment refers to the element with id="bar". Proposals[edit] Several proposals have been made for fragment identifiers for use with plain text documents (which cannot store anchor metadata), or to refer to locations within HTML documents in which the author has not used anchor tags: See also[edit] References[edit] ^ "RFC 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax". External links[edit]

The complex dynamics of collaborative tagging The debate within the Web community over the optimal means by which to organize information often pits formalized classifications against distributed collaborative tagging systems. A number of questions remain unanswered, however, regarding the nature of collaborative tagging systems including whether coherent categorization schemes can emerge from unsupervised tagging by users. This paper uses data from the social bookmarking site delicio. us to examine the dynamics of collaborative tagging systems. In particular, we examine whether the distribution of the frequency of use of tags for "popular" sites with a long history (many tags and many users) can be described by a power law distribution, often characteristic of what are considered complex systems. We produce a generative model of collaborative tagging in order to understand the basic dynamics behind tagging, including how a power law distribution of tags could arise.

Free-culture movement Social movement promoting the freedom to distribute and modify the creative works of others Lawrence Lessig, an influential activist of the free-culture movement, in 2005. The free-culture movement is a social movement that promotes the freedom to distribute and modify the creative works of others in the form of free content[1][2] or open content[3][4][5] without compensation to, or the consent of, the work's original creators, by using the Internet and other forms of media. The movement objects to what it considers over-restrictive copyright laws. Many members of the movement argue that such laws hinder creativity.[6] They call this system "permission culture The free-culture movement, with its ethos of free exchange of ideas, is aligned with the free and open-source-software movement, as well as other movements and philosophies such as open access (OA), the remix culture, the hacker culture, the access to knowledge movement, the copyleft movement and the public domain movement. Resources

Everything is Miscellaneous Firebase Firebase is a mobile and web application development platform developed by Firebase, Inc. in 2011, then acquired by Google in 2014.[5] As of October 2018, the Firebase platform has 18 products,[6] which are used by 1.5 million apps.[7] History[edit] Firebase evolved from Envolve, a prior startup founded by James Tamplin and Andrew Lee in 2011. Envolve provided developers an API that enables the integration of online chat functionality into their websites. After releasing the chat service, Tamplin and Lee found that it was being used to pass application data that weren't chat messages. Developers were using Envolve to sync application data such as game state in real time across their users. Firebase's first product was the Firebase Real-time Database, an API that synchronizes application data across iOS, Android, and Web devices, and stores it on Firebase's cloud. In 2014, Firebase launched two products. In October 2014, Firebase was acquired by Google.[14] Services[edit] Analytics[edit]

Visualizing Del.icio.us Roundup I have been coming across many del.icio.us tools to visualize usage during my daily researching hours. So many, that I have decided to start making note of the ones I come across. From the span of about two weeks, I have been collecting as many as I could find. I will list each one along with a description. Enjoy! There’s a couple more that I have in mind, but they don’t seem to be working at the moment.

Related: