No Child Left Behind Act. The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB)[1][2] is a United States Act of Congress that is a reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which included Title I, the government's flagship aid program for disadvantaged students.[3] NCLB supports standards-based education reform based on the premise that setting high standards and establishing measurable goals can improve individual outcomes in education. The Act requires states to develop assessments in basic skills. To receive federal school funding, states must give these assessments to all students at select grade levels. The Act does not assert a national achievement standard. Each individual state develops its own standards.[4] NCLB expanded the federal role in public education through annual testing, annual academic progress, report cards, teacher qualifications, and funding changes.[3] The bill passed in the U.S.
Legislative history[edit] Provisions of the act[edit] Increased accountability[edit] Race to the Top. Race to the Top, abbreviated R2T, RTTT or RTT, is a $4.35 billion United States Department of Education contest created to spur innovation and reforms in state and local district K-12 education. It is funded by the ED Recovery Act as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and was announced by President Barack Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan on July 24, 2009.
States were awarded points for satisfying certain educational policies, such as performance-based standards (often referred to as an Annual professional performance review) for teachers and principals, complying with Common Core standards, lifting caps on charter schools, turning around the lowest-performing schools, and building data systems. Criteria for Funding[edit] State applications for funding were scored on selection criteria worth a total of 500 points.
Effects[edit] Many states changed their policies to make their applications more competitive. [edit] Awards[edit] Criticisms[edit] Obama Proposes Education Technology Agency Modeled After DARPA. The Obama Administration has proposed a new agency within the Department of Education that will fund the development of new education technologies and promote their use in the classroom. In an updated version of its 2009 Strategy for American Innovation, the White House announced today that the president's 2012 budget request will call for the creation of Advanced Research Projects Agency-Education (ARPA-ED). The name is a deliberate takeoff on the Sputnik-era DARPA within the Department of Defense that funded what became the Internet and the much newer Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) that hopes to lead the country into a clean-energy future. ARPA-ED will seek to correct what an Administration official calls the country's massive "underinvestment" in educational technologies that could improve student learning.
"We know that information and communications technologies are having a transformative impact on other sectors. But that's not the case in K-12 education. " Grading New York Teachers - When the Formulas Lie. Kozol's Savage Inequalities, Book Review Of. Need a Term Paper for College? Our very best writers will produce any essay or term paper you are looking for! We offer reasonable prices and deliver top quality papers on virtually any topic. Our service is available 24/7. Be sure that we are reliable and consistent. Order your custom term paper for only $12.95 a page! Book Review Of Kozol's Savage Inequalities Jonathan Kozol. Word Count: 1169. Savage Inequalities: Children in America's Schools (9780060974992): Jonathan Kozol.
(pdf)by-D-Beauford Jonathan-Kozol-Savage-Inequalities. Inexcusable Inequalities! This is NOT the post funding equity era! I’ve heard it over and over again from reformy pundits. Funding equity? Been there done that. It doesn’t make a damn bit of difference. It’s all about teacher quality! (which of course has little or nothing to do with funding equity?). The bottom line is that equitable and adequate financing of schools is a NECESSARY UNDERLYING CONDITION FOR EVERYTHING ELSE! I’m sick of hearing, from pundits who’ve never run a number themselves and have merely passed along copies of the meaningless NCES Table showing national average spending in high poverty districts slightly greater than that for lower poverty ones.
I’m sick of the various iterations of the “we’ve tripled spending and gotten nothing for it” argument and accompanying bogus graphs. I’m also sick of those who would so absurdly argue that districts serving low-income and minority children really have more than enough money to deliver good programs, but they’ve squandered it all on useless stuff like cheerleading and ceramics. Like this: Bruce Baker Gets Angry. Stand back: I’ve heard it over and over again from reformy pundits. Funding equity? Been there done that. It doesn’t make a damn bit of difference. Bruce's bias against corporate reform obviously comes from his over-reliance on "facts" and "logic" and "reason" and the other stuff that is an anathema to people who really care about kids.
If Bruce were a "serious" person, he wouldn't continue to keep producing research that shows how equality of resources matter, or how using standardized tests to evaluate teachers is the functional equivalent of rolling dice, or how charter schools are not nearly as great as their supporters say. No, Bruce: "serious" people don't work on "research" that's "peer-reviewed" and uses the "scientific method" to get to the "truth. " They're hanging out with the stars - it shows how "serious" they are! Yo, professor!