Uranium - the 'demon metal' that threatens us all - News. Uranium converts background radiation into photoelectrons which smash up the chromosomes like an egg whisk. I am going to ramble about a bit here, but it's a bit of a rambling tale, which I hope will come together at the end. I start with Africa. A few years ago I was in the middle of nowhere in Tanzania, in a big thatched hall attempting to explain to the locals why it wasn't a good idea to allow the open-cast mining of Uranium in their tribal territory.
I say: "At the beginning of time there was created the evil spirit Uranium, which deformed children and killed their parents with horrible diseases. Mungu (God) fought with the demon and trapped his power throughout the earth in the ground, tied into the rocks. "Now greedy men wish to free the demon to use his powers to make money, but the effects will be terrible and you must not allow it. " Later, I thought this ad hoc explanation was quite accurate. Since 1910, childhood leukemia tracks Uranium and Radium Fallujah - shake, bake, irradiate. The Minimum Latent Period for Thyroid Cancer according to the literature pre 311. Those who disagree with Yamashita 2013 : Free Full Text. Childhood thyroid cancer: comparison of Japan and Belarus.
Shirahige Y, Ito M, Ashizawa K, Motomura T, Yokoyama N, Namba H, Fukata S, Yokozawa T, Ishikawa N, Mimura T, Yamashita S, Sekine I, Kuma K, Ito K, Nagataki S. Source First Department of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan. Endocr J. 1998 Apr;45(2):203-9. 2. Chernobyl A Decade – Proceedings of the Fifth Chernobyl Sasakawa Medical Cooperation Symposium, Kiev, Ukraine, 14-15 October 1996 (International Congress S.) 3. Chernobyl Radiation-induced Thyroid Cancers in Belarus Mikhail V. From the From Department of Surgery, UCSF Affiliated Hospitals, San Francisco, California.
“Latency Period of Benign and Malignant Thyroid Tumors Like this: Like Loading... Life and Death Choices: Radiation, children, and Japan’s future 生死を分ける選択—放射線、子どもの健康、そして日本の未来. The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 11, Issue 22, No. 1, June 2, 2013. Life and Death Choices: Radiation, children, and Japan’s future 生死を分ける選択—放射線、子どもの健康、そして日本の未来 Two years after the start of Japan’s nuclear disaster, parents fear for their children’s future. David McNeill Like most fathers, Fujimoto Yoji frets about the health of his young children. Three days after meltdown began at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant on 11 March, 2011, Fujimoto moved his two daughters, then aged four and three, to safety hundreds of kilometers away.
Although Mr Fujimoto and his family were in Chiba Prefecture, over 100km (60 miles) from the nuclear plant and in the opposite direction from the worst of the fallout, he believes his daughter inhaled enough radiation to cause her illness. On May 31, 2013 the United Nations said it did not expect to see elevated rates of cancer from Fukushima, though it recommended continued monitoring < link > . Dr. But he says parents like Mr. Dr. Related articles. Oxygen tension in cells as a variable to radiation dose response. Nukers the world over pretend, while actually knowing otherwise, that different individuals have differing responses and effects from exposures to radiation. T(his is opening confirmed by scientific reports regarding the effects (cost/benefit in the medical setting) of internal emitters such as Sr89Cl.
The medical reports for Sr89 Cl are copious and have been since the deliberate suppression of this 1942 treatment was breached by doctors in Germany in the 1970s. To them it was their discovery, but the AEC and DOE had known about it all the time). The dose response in this example is seen in various degrees of calcium flushing, temporary pain prior to longer term pain reduction in end of life bone cancer patients (the only people Sr89 may be legally administered to, despite what TEPCO may say, as it is, while a potent shrinker of existing bone tumors, a potent cause of bone tumours, hence its limited and palliative use.
This work was supported by U. Accepted November 1, 1963. Ummary 8. How much Strontium 89 does it take to equal the Biological Effect of 1 GRAM of Radium? .00075 grams of Strontium has the same biological effectiveness as 1 gram of radium. (Q values= alpha 20 (radium) Beta (Sr89) 1*) (*these are the Q factors used in the calculation of the Sievert. The Sievert attempts to equate all types of radiation (photon, particles to each other. The energy of Sr89 beta particles calls into question the assumption that Beta Q = 1 imo.) Think grams, not sieverts. Data sources: Toxicological Profile of Strontium, ADSTR – CDC, Linus Pauling, Wikipedia, Argonne National Laboratory. 1 gram of radium = 1 curie. 1 gram of Strontium 89 = 1 curie.
(ADSTR Tox. profiles) 1 curie = 3.7 x 1010 atomic disintegrations (emissions) per second. What is an allegedly beneficial dose of Sr89 which is allowable in the body? Reactors are not zero emissions. Fukushima has shortened lives – noone knows who the individuals are or how many years of life each one has lost.
Authorities will not go looking. These are my views. That’s what I was taught anyway. Like this: Allowable lifetime dose. Food. Cesium compared to Potassium. in brief. A comparison of potassium and cesium. 1. Potassium and its radioactive isotope K40: Potassium 40 (K40) Half life : 1.3 billion years. Natural abundance: 0.012% of all potassium is K40. Radioactivity in Curies: 0.0000071 curies (per gram). Type of radiation emitted: Beta (energy 0.52 MEV), gamma energy 0.16 MeV). 2.
Cesium 137 Isotope: Cs-137 half life: 30 years radioactivity in Curies: 88 (per gram) Beta (energy 0.19MeV) some gamma. Is potassium a nutrient needed for life ? Is the slight presence of the weakly radioactive potassium 40 an excuse for the presence of cesium 137 ? Does having potassium present in the diet protect against or reduce the uptake of, Cesium 137 in food ? Are bananas which are free of cesium contamination a rich source of potassium ?
Does the United States use potassium fertilizer to reduce the cesium 137 contamination of test crops grown on Bikini Atoll ? Are these test crops much lower in radioactivity after being enriched with potassium than before? Like this: Allowable LIfetime Dose Explained by the Health Physics Society. Quote from the article: “You are correct in saying that the radiation itself is not stored up by the body, but the rationale used in radiation protection for restricting cumulative doses has been that the probability of inducing certain serious effects, such as cancer, is proportional to the dose. This leads to a conclusion that, although the radiation does not accumulate in the body, the risk is cumulative, and provides grounds for limiting lifetime doses as well as annual doses. Most of the actual risk data that we have are based on high doses (greater than 100 mSv or 10 rem) received over a very short time.
We project risk from these data to lower dose levels of the magnitude that might be expected, for instance, for occupational workers whose doses are generally low and received at low dose rates. The concept of doses having a radioprotective effect remains controversial. Various claims have been made for this type of radiation. Allowable LIfetime Dose – Food. The well fed are less vulnerable to fallout contamination in food than the poorly nourished.
The body needs its daily requirement of calcium and potassium. If it does not get these requirements, it seeks the substances out and will use the next available substance if it has to In simple terms this is true. The stomach lining can discriminate between calcium and strontium. It can discriminate between potassium and cesium. At mealtimes, the more calcium and potassium in the stomach, the less strontium and cesium will be absorbed from food. The discrimination ratios were defined in detail during the bomb test era. In the acute phase of the Fukushima emergency, some people were lucky enough to have been given potassium iodine tablets. The iodine in the tablets occupied the thyroid gland and any radio iodine absorbed by the person did not take up residence in the thyroid. The same principle can be used at meal times.
Potassium is another matter. And here it gets complicated. Potassium is harder.