background preloader


Facebook Twitter

Test psychologique: Style d'attachement dans les relations amoureuses. Search Results. Expérience de Milgram. Obedience, le documentaire de Stanley Milgram sur l'expérience. Reconstitution de l'expérience de Milgram (extrait)[1] L’expérimentateur (E) amène le sujet (S) à infliger des chocs électriques à un autre participant, l’apprenant (A), qui est en fait un acteur. La majorité des participants continuent à infliger les prétendus chocs jusqu'au maximum prévu (450 V) en dépit des plaintes de l'acteur. L'expérience de Milgram est une expérience de psychologie réalisée entre 1960 et 1963 par le psychologue américain Stanley Milgram. Cette expérience cherchait à évaluer le degré d'obéissance d'un individu devant une autorité qu'il juge légitime et à analyser le processus de soumission à l'autorité, notamment quand elle induit des actions qui posent des problèmes de conscience au sujet.

La date de l'expérience est importante, car quelques années plus tard, 1967-1968, s'installeront au contraire des formes de méfiance envers l'autorité. Déroulement de l'expérience[modifier | modifier le code] Divers. Hyperactivité Adulte TDAH TDA Déficit d'Attention Probleme concentration Procrastination Cyclothymie Impulsivité. cerveau droit hp Coaching. For Better Social Skills, Scientists Recommend a Little Chekhov. Casey Kelbaugh for The New York TimesEmanuele Castano, left, and David Comer Kidd, researchers in the New School for Social Research’s psychology department. Say you are getting ready for a blind date or a job interview. What should you do? Besides shower and shave, of course, it turns out you should read — but not just anything. Something by Chekhov or Alice Munro will help you navigate new social territory better than a potboiler by Danielle Steel.

That is the conclusion of a study published Thursday in the journal Science. It found that after reading literary fiction, as opposed to popular fiction or serious nonfiction, people performed better on tests measuring empathy, social perception and emotional intelligence — skills that come in especially handy when you are trying to read someone’s body language or gauge what they might be thinking. “This is why I love science,” Louise Erdrich, whose novel “The Round House” was used in one of the experiments, wrote in an e-mail. Dr. Dr. Ms. Novel Finding: Reading Literary Fiction Improves Empathy.

How important is reading fiction in socializing school children? Researchers at The New School in New York City have found evidence that literary fiction improves a reader’s capacity to understand what others are thinking and feeling. Emanuele Castano, a social psychologist, along with PhD candidate David Kidd conducted five studies in which they divided a varying number of participants (ranging from 86 to 356) and gave them different reading assignments: excerpts from genre (or popular) fiction, literary fiction, nonfiction or nothing. After they finished the excerpts the participants took a test that measured their ability to infer and understand other people’s thoughts and emotions.

The researchers found, to their surprise, a significant difference between the literary- and genre-fiction readers. When study participants read non-fiction or nothing, their results were unimpressive. Literary fiction, by contrast, focuses more on the psychology of characters and their relationships.

Psychologie différentielle

Getting Psychopaths to Empathize. Feeling for other people may not come naturally to psychopaths, but they could be capable of putting themselves in others’ shoes. Christian Keysers performs an fMRI scanEUREKALERT, ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES Psychopathy is a disorder characterized by extreme heartlessness toward other people.

However, according to a study published today (July 25) in the journal Brain, psychopathic criminals may be able to muster some empathy when asked to imagine themselves in another person’s situation. “The predominant notion had been that they are callous individuals, unable to feel emotions themselves and therefore unable to feel emotions in others,” coauthor Christian Keysers of the University of Groningen in the Netherlands told BBC News. But Essi Viding, who studies developmental psychopathology at University College London and was not involved in the study, was skeptical.

Psychologie positive

Worried Sick. Something strange was happening in New Zealand. In the fall of 2007, pharmacies across the country had begun dispensing a new formulation of Eltroxin—the only thyroid hormone replacement drug approved and paid for by the government and used by tens of thousands of New Zealanders since 1973. Within months, reports of side effects began trickling in to the government’s health-care monitoring agency. These included known side effects of the drug, such as lethargy, joint pain, and depression, as well as symptoms not normally associated with the drug or disease, including eye pain, itching, and nausea. Then, the following summer, the floodgates opened: in the 18 months following the release of the new tablets, the rate of Eltroxin adverse event reporting rose nearly 2,000-fold.1 The strange thing was, the active ingredient in the drug, thyroxine, was exactly the same.

Laboratory testing proved that the new formulation was bioequivalent to the old one. So why were people getting sick? K.


FOMO Addiction: The Fear of Missing Out. As serendipity often strikes randomly, I was reading an article in The New York Times by Jenna Wortham the other day at the same time I was reading the chapter in Sherry Turkle’s new book, Alone Together about people who fear they are missing out. Teens and adults text while driving, because the possibility of a social connection is more important than their own lives (and the lives of others). They interrupt one call to take another, even when they don’t know who’s on the other line (but to be honest, we’ve been doing this for years before caller ID).

They check their Twitter stream while on a date, because something more interesting or entertaining just might be happening. It’s not “interruption,” it’s connection. We are so connected with one another through our Twitter streams and Foursquare check-ins, through our Facebook and LinkedIn updates, that we can’t just be alone anymore. So they are indeed fake, because instead of us being completely real, many (most?) I have my doubts. Dr.


Psychanalyse. Psychologie de la communication. Émotions. Psychologie. Auto efficacité.