Papers in systematic reviews. The University of Texas School of Public Health – Search filters for Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycINFO, PubMed, Ebsco CINAHL. About filters A filter is a search strategy that has been developed to define certain criteria for your search.
The Centre for Reviews and Dissemination has a list of published filters along with information on appraisal of search filters, links to articles that have evaluated filters, etc. When selecting a filter, be sure to look at the date of development as changes to database terms and structure can affect the performance of the search filter. How will these filters help me? The filters displayed on this page will help you locate specific types of studies (clinical trials, cohorts, cross-sectionals, etc.) as well as systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Have these filters been tested? These filters have not been tested for sensitivity (true positives) or specificity (true negatives). How do I use the filter? Select the filter you need by copying an entire search string for the database that you want to search. Paste the search string into the search text box of your database. Home. EPPI-Centre Home. SCIE - Using systematic reviews to improve social care. The Campbell Collaboration. The purpose of a systematic review is to sum up the best available research on a specific question.
This is done by synthesizing the results of several studies. A systematic review uses transparent procedures to find, evaluate and synthesize the results of relevant research. Procedures are explicitly defined in advance, in order to ensure that the exercise is transparent and can be replicated. This practice is also designed to minimize bias.
Studies included in a review are screened for quality, so that the findings of a large number of studies can be combined. A systematic review must have: Clear inclusion/ exclusion criteria An explicit search strategy Systematic coding and analysis of included studies Meta-analysis (where possible) How do Campbell systematic reviews differ from other systematic reviews? Systematic Reviews. Objectives This unit looks at the critical appraisal of systematic reviews.
By the end of this unit you will: Understand why systematic reviews are so important for health care decision makers Understand what procedures minimise bias in a systematic review and make it more trustworthy Have critically appraised a systematic review Pre-requisites It is not necessary to have completed any of the other units prior to doing this unit. Activity In this unit you will find: An introduction to the critical appraisal of systematic reviews. The components of this unit follow a logical sequence and you should work through them in the order they appear. PROSPERO - International prospective register of systematic reviews.
PubMed Clinical Queries. ISSG Search Filters Resource - Systematic reviews. National Institute for Health Research - NHS - Systematic Reviews. The NIHR is a global leader in producing and promoting systematic reviews.
These are high-quality research evidence which supports decision-making in health and social care. The findings of individual research studies are rarely sufficient to justify new treatments. Systematic reviews identify, evaluate, combine and summarise the findings of all relevant individual studies and, when carried out well, provide decision-makers with the best possible information about the effects of tests, treatments and other interventions used in health and social care. The NIHR supports three systematic review programmes:UK Cochrane Centre and Cochrane Review GroupsThe UK Cochrane Centre supports the preparation, maintenance and accessibility of systematic reviews of the effects of healthcare interventions produced by 22 NIHR funded Cochrane Review Groups. The Centre is part of the international Cochrane Collaboration.
. · Aberdeen Health Technology Assessment Group, University of Aberdeen. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd.