background preloader

#todo-work

Facebook Twitter

Method for establishing a social network system based on motif, This application claims priority under 35 USC § 119(a)-(d) of Chinese patent application number 200610026085.6, filed on Apr. 26, 2006, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference. In a social network, every actor, which can be an individual or an organization, must decide with which other actor(s) to interact. This is nontrivial when no central directories are available.

An example is a referral system, wherein each participant gives out referrals. Applicable domains of referral systems include business administration and knowledge administration. . (1) a first node (e.g., a member) generates a question as to a certain theme for help; (2) the first node selects some of the adjoining nodes as the receiving party for its request for help according to the selection standard stipulated by the first node, and such help can be the solution to the question or a referral to another node. . (4) the requesting node evaluates the solution it has acquired. Main Page - Social Patterns. 8 tools to find semantic similarity between words | Science for. Joe McCarthy - Publications. Carsonified » Meet @HelloApp, Making Conferences More Fun. GraffitiGeo: A mobile mix of Yelp and Mob Wars.

GraffitiGeo is the latest company to offer an iPhone application that gives you a quick way to see and rate restaurants — but it provides the added simplicity of letting you merely point your phone at the physical location. The application is pending approval by Apple’s app store (and to be clear, this will be the company’s second application; its existing app is meant to be a sort of Twitter-based Digg for restaurant ratings.) Here’s a YouTube review of what the pending application looks like. You’ll see it shows reviews of restaurants layered over the screen of your iPhone when you’re standing in front of a restaurant and pointing your iPhone at it.

You can pan your iPhone down the street and see other reviews. That far, it’s great. Except then it goes on to try to do too much. The main value it seems to offer is a way to rate and review restaurants and other joints much quicker and simpler than Yelp. WiseStamp Email Signatures that work for you!

Prepare Yourselves: Augmented Reality Hype on the Rise. Augmented reality -- or the addition of a layer to the world before your eyes (aka the "real world") using technology -- is the next big tech trend. Already making its debut in everything from mobile apps to kids toys, "AR" will clearly soon be talked about by everyone the way they used to talk about "social media" and "Web 2.0" before that. While augmented reality has its uses -- although many of them just involve oohing and aahing at nifty apps -- this trend is already in danger of being over-hyped, even though it has barely gotten off the ground. AR Apps We've Seen So Far We've been fascinated by augmented reality for some time now, especially after we got wind of a new mobile application built for Google's Android platform called Layar.

The app, an augmented reality browser, "layers" sets of data on top of your mobile phone's viewfinder as you point the camera at the city around you. AR Discovered by Marketers. Time to Dial Down the Hype? Semanta | SmILE. "Semanta is seriously not fond of Drupal! " What? Semanta is a group of add-ins/extensions to popular existing Mail User Agents. As of yet, Semanta has been integrated as an add/in extension to Microsoft Outlook and Mozilla Thunderbird. Based on the knwoledge in the sMail Conceptual Framework , Semanta supports the user with the management of workflows (e.g.

Keeping track of Email Action Items Via Semanta, the user can easily keep track of email with action items that require attention (Fig. 1a,b), as well as be automatically reminded of any required replies or other actions. Figure 1a: Items having pending action items (Outlook) Figure 1b: Items having pending action items (Thunderbird) Action Item Handling Support The user is supported with the handling of each action item, based on its type (Fig. 2a,b). Figure 2a: Support for handling individual action items (Outlook) Figure 2b: Support for handling individual action items (Thunderbird) Figure 4b: File attachment reminders How? ThisIsLike Shows an Editable Web of Associations.

Trying to explain ThisIsLike to a friend ends up sounding like a junior high locker conversation: "He photographed a model, who is also a performing artist, who was in this band, and one of her bandmates was this other girl, who now writes for this website, which is actually similar to this other site, which was founded by this guy. " That's one way to explain the degrees of separation between two people. Another way would be to click through the photos, videos, links, and descriptions on ThisIsLike.com or watch our screencast of that process. The site allows users to find and create associations between people, places, artistic movements, and just about any other hub for information.

It's like a Wikipedia with an even broader, richer trail of digital breadcrumbs between topics, or like a Last.fm, but not just for music. Already, the site has a slew of music, art, and philosophy entries and links. When Internal Collaboration Is Bad for Your Company - HBR.org. The Idea in Brief Are you promoting cross-unit collaboration for collaboration’s sake? If so, you may be putting your company at risk. Collaboration can deliver tremendous benefits (innovative offerings, new sales). But it can also backfire if its costs (including delays stemming from turf battles) prove larger than you expected. To distinguish good collaboration from bad, estimate three factors: Return: “What cash flow would this collaboration generate if executed effectively?”

Would the return exceed the combined opportunity and collaboration costs? The Idea in Practice In deciding whether to launch a collaborative effort, managers can fall victim to three common errors. Overestimating the Return Many companies place a mistakenly high economic value on collaboration. Example: Daimler’s $36 billion acquisition of Chrysler in 1998 failed to deliver the promised synergies between the two automakers. Ignoring Opportunity Costs Underestimating Collaboration Costs How Collaboration Can Go Wrong.