background preloader

Journal Article Critical Review Paper

Facebook Twitter Critically Evaluating a Journal Article. The purpose of a critical review of a journal article is to describe the general nature of the work.

Critically Evaluating a Journal Article

The critical review should summarize, analyze and evaluate the journal article. The review usually has three main parts: Identification of author & work Reviews should begin with a full bibliographic citation (author, date, title of journal article, name of journal, volume, issue, and pages). Relevant biographical information about the author's qualifications can also be included. Summary Define the general subject/problem/research areas, the scope (what the author intends to discuss and why), and the central idea. Analysis/Evaluation In this section, you must analyze the various parts of the article thoughtfully and carefully so that you can establish its strengths and weaknesses.

Consider the following questions; however, not all will be appropriate for every article. What is the objective/purpose of the research, study or work discussed in the article? Organization. How to Write Critical Reviews of Journal Articles? Critical Review Essay. Critical Review Paper. The Assignment The critical review paper is not meant to be a difficult or onerous assignment.

Critical Review Paper

Your paper should be three double spaced pages in length (i.e., about 1000 words), not including the title page. In this short paper I want you to critically analyze and interpret a research article that is relevant to the study of navigation. (See below for suggestions on what to look for.) In many respects you can consider this assignment as nothing more than a "book review", which practically everyone has had to write at one time or another.

The only difference is that in this case you are not reviewing an entire book, but only a single journal article. Purpose The purpose of this assignment is three-fold. Writing forCollege. Scholarly Article Critique Student Example. Chris K.Research Critique 1 Jamber, E.

Scholarly Article Critique Student Example

A., & Zhang, J .J. (1997). Investigating leadership, gender, and coaching level using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale. Journal of Sport Behavior, 20, 313-322. The purpose of the study was to determine possible differences in leadership behaviors, using the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS), between male and female coaches and among different coaching levels. Hypothesis was that male and female coaches would respond differently to the RLSS in overall leadership behaviors. Would occur among coaching levels: junior high, high school, and college. The sample was nonrandom, including 162 coaches that were chosen on a volunteer basis. Female. School, and 38 (0.24) at the college level. With the distribution of the sample. Is rather low. Analysis, particularly when looking for possible interactions between gender and coaching level. The instrument utilized was the Revised Leadership for Sport Scale (RLSS) developed and situational consideration.