Eco-Skeptics
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
debate on climate change: counter-arguments
35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore’s movie | Monckton
A spokesman for Al Gore has issued a questionable response to the news that in October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine “errors” in his movie An Inconvenient Truth. The judge had stated that, if the UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position on these nine “errors”, he would have made a finding that the Government’s distribution of the film and the first draft of the guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children. Al Gore’s spokesman and “environment advisor,” Ms.
Al Gore - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Albert Arnold " Al " Gore, Jr. (born March 31, 1948) served as the 45th Vice President of the United States (1993–2001), under President Bill Clinton . He was the Democratic Party's nominee for President and won the popular vote in the 2000 U.S. presidential election .
Catastrophe Denied: The Science of the Skeptic’s Position | Climate Skeptic
I have repaired the overscan issues in the DVD files and am re-posting the links, which are all good now. Once upon a time, Al Gore had a PowerPoint deck. Several years ago, I came to the conclusion that Gore’s presentation was deeply flawed, so I made my own PowerPoint deck in response, and have been updating it ever since. Here is the most recent version Then, Al Gore made a movie from his PowerPoint deck. He won an Oscar and a Nobel prize for his movie.In a study sure to ruffle the feathers of the Global Warming cabal, Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT has published a paper which proves that IPCC models are overstating by 6 times, the relevance of CO 2 in Earth’s Atmosphere. Dr. Lindzen has found that heat is radiated out in to space at a far higher rate than any modeling system to date can account for. Editorial: The science is in. the scare is out.
Carbon Dioxide irrelevant in climate debate says MIT Scientist - Portland civil rights | Examiner.com
The Fiction Of Climate Science - Forbes.com
Many of you are too young to remember, but in 1975 our government pushed "the coming ice age." Random House dutifully printed "THE WEATHER CONSPIRACY … coming of the New Ice Age." This may be the only book ever written by 18 authors. All 18 lived just a short sled ride from Washington, D.C. Newsweek fell in line and did a cover issue warning us of global cooling on April 28, 1975. And The New York Times , Aug. 14, 1976, reported "many signs that Earth may be headed for another ice age."
Image by włodi via Flickr In last week’s column , I lamented the devolution of the climate debate into dueling ad hominem attacks, which has led in almost a straight line to the incredible totalitarian vision of the 10:10 climate group’s recent film showing school kids getting blown up for not adhering to the global warming alarmists’ position. In writing that column, it struck me that it was not surprising that many average folks may be unfamiliar with the science behind the climate skeptic’s position, since it almost never appears anywhere in the press. This week I want to give a necessarily brief summary of the skeptic’s case. There is not space here to include all the charts and numbers; for those interested, this video and slide presentation provides much of the analytical backup.
Denying the Catastrophe: The Science of the Climate Skeptic’s Position - Warren Meyer - Coyote Den - Forbes
eco-mottery
economical interest in eco-skeptics
literature on eco-skeptics
supporters of eco-skepticism
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/feb/07/climate-scepticis