background preloader

Reading Research

Facebook Twitter

Critically reading a paper. How to evaluate journal articles. How to read a scientific study. Over the years I have received many emails about scientific research and health care.

How to read a scientific study

Three types of these emails interest me in particular. One type I’ll call the “evil scientific conspiracy” group. For example, the email might be angry that I have listed the site Quackwatch.com as part of my list of links. The writer might feel that this demonstrates my close-mindedness about alternative medicine. What such a link in fact demonstrates is my own commitment to evidence-based health practice.

The second type of email takes the opposite approach. The third type I’ll call the pseudoscience whackjobs. How do we know what the “truth” is? Academic pressures And we can’t even count on the honesty of scientific research. A university legend from an institution that shall remain nameless concerns a certain physics professor who was known for his prodigious research output. But even among honest researchers, experimentation often yields no “results” in the form of breakthroughs or eureka moments. Evaluating the Literature : Medscape.

Services and Web Sites Covered This policy describes what information may be collected about you when you use the services made available through the WebMD Health Professional Network (as defined below), how this information may be used, how you can control how your information is used and what precautions are taken against unauthorized access or use of your information.

Evaluating the Literature : Medscape

The services made available through the WebMD Health Professional Network may be provided in a variety of mediums and devices now known or hereinafter developed including mobile applications, and include without limitation news, reference tools and applications, sponsored programming, personalized content, continuing medical education, communication tools and discussion boards (collectively, the "Services"). You should read the privacy policy of each website that you visit after you leave any of the WebMD Health Professional Network websites. Privacy Policy Changes Information We Collect Continuing Medical Education. CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATING RESEARCH. Tips for Reading Scientific Research Reports. Not all science or research is created equal.

Tips for Reading Scientific Research Reports

Some research is likely to hold more weight than other research. Researchers and academics often recognize quality research readily, while others — even other professionals such as doctors and clinicians — may struggle with understanding the value of any given journal article. The intent of this article is to provide some basic tips on reading research reports. I will assume you already have at a least a basic understanding of different methods and statistical procedures used in analyzing research data. (In order to maximize the benefits of reading a research report it is important to have at least a basic understanding of research methods and statistics.) Reading Scientific Research Articles - Physics - LibGuides at Westmont College. Lecture1.dvi - ReadPaper.pdf. ReadingResearchPaper.pdf. Durbin, How to Read an Scientific Article. How to Analyze Figures From Research Papers. How to Analyze Figures from Research Papers Biology 601 fall 2006 Easton/Wadsworth. eastondp@buffalostate.edu wadswogj@buffalostate.edu.

How to Analyze Figures From Research Papers

In order to effectively read research papers, one must be able to interpret the figures. Actually, if you just look at the figures and legends, you could almost read the paper without reading the body at all. What to Look for in Figures Figures usually represent the results of one or more experiments. CHECKLIST FOR EVALUATING A RESEARCH REPORT. Guidelines on how to evaluate a research article. Preparing to do Research, © Irene Ng Guidelines for Article Evaluation The following are four key criteria commonly used to assess the quality of researcharticles and academic thesis/dissertation.

Guidelines on how to evaluate a research article

These are: 1. Theoretical/Conceptual Soundness. Evaluating Sources of Information. Summary: Evaluating sources of information is an important step in any research activity.

Evaluating Sources of Information

This section provides information on evaluating bibliographic citations, aspects of evaluation, reading evaluation, print vs. Internet sources, and evaluating Internet sources. Contributors:Dana Lynn Driscoll, Allen BrizeeLast Edited: 2013-02-22 08:33:14 The world is full of information to be found—however, not all of it is valid, useful, or accurate. The quantity of information available is so staggering that we cannot know everything about a subject. Similarly, for information on other topics, not only is there a huge quantity available but with a very uneven level of quality. Critical Evaluation of a Published Paper. Bonine & Oh ECOL 437 Fall 2006 (modified from Pasch and Bonine 2003) Critical Evaluation of a Published Paper During the course of the semester we will be reading, presenting, “writing”, and critically evaluating journal articles (We will write our term papers as if we were writing a journal article, but with a modified Methods section and without the Results section).

Critical Evaluation of a Published Paper

How to evaluate journal articles.