Physics revision | GCSE and A Level Physics Revision | Cyberphysics, the revision website. Arguments For And Against Nuclear Power Philosophy Essay. The title question of my case study is: 'Should Nuclear Power be Banned'. I have chosen this question as I believe it is a key topic at this present moment in life, with a lot of information about it in the media, such as on the news and in the papers each day.
Also it is something that will affect the life in which we live in the future. So because of these reasons it is something that people need to be aware of and need to actually understand what nuclear power is and how it is affecting us or is going to affect us in the years to come. Evidence for: 'One major problem that could occur with nuclear power is that there is always the risk that there could be a leakage' of radioactive fluids, which will have a massive impact on the environment and its surroundings. Struggling with your essay?
Get The Grade You ordered Evidence against ( 25th September 2010, 10:30. Nuclear power is made and generated by using Uranium. 30thJanuary 2011, 17:00. The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power - Playlist. The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power - Playlist. Do you think we should build more nuclear power plants? Essay:Arguments against nuclear power. [edit] Nuclear waste The anti-nuclear movement is preoccupied with the problem of nuclear waste and its possible impact on the environment and health. Generation of nuclear waste, which is dangerous to all known forms of life, is a valid concern about nuclear power, and the problem must be addressed in an environmentally sound way. However, there is no reason to believe this problem is insoluble. Here are some claims made by the anti-nuclear movement in reference to the waste issue. More: Nuclear waste [edit] There is no solution The validity of this claim is highly dependent on your definition of "solution".
If we define "solution" as something that lets humanity forget about the waste without adverse consequences at a cost that is a small portion of the price of generated electricity, then there are a few options. [edit] It will remain toxic for millions of years [edit] There vast amounts of it [edit] It is a burden on future generations [edit] The public will pay for its disposal [edit] For and Against - Nuclear energy in the UK. I come to this subject with some trepidation as, unlike most commentators, it is not one I get particularly het up about. While I have dedicated much of my life to reducing our impact on the planet, I am not a political Green. I have never owned a Citroën 2CV, I am not a veggie, and the only time I ever hugged a tree I felt like a right charlie.A significant amount of anti-nuclear sentiment is driven by an ideological, almost religious, belief that the technology is ‘evil’.
But the fact that much of the criticism is irrational doesn’t mean that it is immune from rational critique. As an engineer I like to think I take a rational attitude to any technology. So can the currently becalmed UK nuclear energy rise again to become a sustainable energy solution? The first meaning is sustainable in a practical sense.
So where are we with ‘peak uranium’? A third, meaning of ‘sustainable’ is politically sustainable. But the bigger issue is proliferation of nuclear weapons on a global scale. Nuclear power debate. Stewart Brand at a 2010 debate, "Does the world need nuclear energy? "[1] The nuclear power debate is a long-running controversy[2][3][4][5][6][7][8] about the risks and benefits of using nuclear reactors to generate electricity for civilian purposes. The debate about nuclear power peaked during the 1970s and 1980s, as more and more reactors were built and came online, and "reached an intensity unprecedented in the history of technology controversies" in some countries.[9][10] Thereafter, the nuclear industry created jobs, focused on safety and public concerns mostly waned.
In the last decade, however, with growing public awareness about climate change and the critical role that carbon dioxide and methane emissions plays in causing the heating of the earth's atmosphere, there's been a resurgence in the intensity nuclear power debate once again. Two opposing camps[edit] Lowe, in turn, makes the following arguments against nuclear power:[26] Electricity and energy supplied[edit] George W. Ten Urgent Reasons to Reject Nuclear Power Now. Bags of radiation-contaminated materials, to be stored in a mountain, in Kawauchi, Japan, Nov. 16, 2012. With the slow pace of cleanup efforts, residents of Okuma, a town evacuated in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster, have become pessimistic about ever living there again.
(Photo: Ko Sasaki / The New York Times) Many citizens do not want nuclear power. They know it is both far too dangerous and far too expensive. UK governments have largely supported nuclear power as well as nuclear weapons. Many citizens do not want nuclear weapons because they know they are insanely dangerous, and they want to live without the constant threat of sudden and complete annihilation hanging over them and their children. The close relationship between the weapons and power in every sense of the word may explain differences in politicians' and citizens' agendas on these issues. 1.
At Fukushima we have the worst industrial disaster ever. International experts (e.g. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. No to Nuclear Power. GCSE Bitesize: Nuclear power stations. Pros and cons of nuclear power | Time for change. As a result of the current discussion how further global warming could be prevented or at least mitigated, the revival of nuclear power seems to be in everybody's - or at least in many politician's - mind. It it interesting to see that in many suggestions to mitigate global warming, the focus is put on the advantages of nuclear power generation, its disadvantages are rarely mentioned.
Hopefully, the following summary of arguments for and against nuclear power can fill this gap: Advantages of nuclear power generation: Nuclear power generation does emit relatively low amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2). The emissions of green house gases and therefore the contribution of nuclear power plants to global warming is therefore relatively little.This technology is readily available, it does not have to be developed first.It is possible to generate a high amount of electrical energy in one single plant. Disadvantages of nuclear power generation: Sustainability: Is nuclear energy sustainable? Conclusion. Arguments for and against nuclear power — Debating Europe. Nuclear Power – Built on Facts. What do we think about nuclear power? Benjamin Cohen of The World’s Fair is not a fan. I am. Modern nuclear power has a lot going for it. In no particular order, here’s the reasons that appeal to me.
It’s reliable. No worrying about solar or wind availability, and it works anywhere.It’s safe. Which isn’t to say I don’t like other technologies as well. What’s more irritating to me personally is the other argument used against nuclear power in the World’s Fair interview: A lot of what people are trying to hang on to when they embrace nukes is the opportunity to do things pretty much the way they’ve always done them: sloppily, wastefully. This isn’t pro-environment, it’s anti-human. Daniel Koffler: Nuclear power should be a part of the candidates' energy policies. In keeping with the frenetic, rhetorical ping-pong that has marked virtually every moment of this young general election, Barack Obama gave a big energy policy speech in Las Vegas last month to counter the big energy speech John McCain gave just prior to it. Obama proposed a substantial federal investment in alternative energy sources, including wind power, solar power and biofuels, and he promised to hike fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks (though he didn't say by how much).
He has already proposed a cap-and-trade scheme with auctions for emissions permits, which are key to making any such scheme work. (John McCain's version of cap-and-trade does not include auctions.) Nuclear power, however, does not figure into Obama's proposed alternatives to reliance on petroleum. Now, to be clear, Obama's energy programme on the whole is a sound and long-overdue, if not terribly ambitious, adjustment in the US approach to fuelling its economy. Nuclear power is green in multiple senses. Devil's Advocate: 10 Green Arguments for Nuclear Power. Science Published on January 15th, 2008 | by Shirley Siluk Gregory January 15th, 2008 by Shirley Siluk Gregory I never thought I’d consider nuclear power a desirable solution to climate change until I read James Lovelock’s latest book, “The Revenge of Gaia: Earth’s Climate Crisis & the Fate of Humanity” (see my previous post on the issue here).
Though I’m still not 100-percent convinced, Lovelock’s arguments are factual, rational and highly persuasive. Here goes: 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. All that said, I still have doubts about the viability of nuclear power as our way out of dangerous climate change, and I don’t believe my concerns are the result of a conspiracy by environmentalists, as some pro-nuclear types suggest. Photo via James Marvin Phelps Copyright 2008 PlanetSave <br /><a style="color: #336699; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;" href=" About the Author.
The Case For and Against Nuclear Power. (See Corrections and Amplifications item below.) Is nuclear power the answer for a warming planet? Or is it too expensive and dangerous to satisfy future energy needs? Interest in nuclear power is heating up, as the hunt intensifies for "green" alternatives to fossil fuels like coal and natural gas. Even some environmentalists have come on board, citing the severity of the global-warming threat to explain their embrace of the once-maligned power source.
But the issue is far from settled. Has nuclear's time come? The argument for nuclear power can be stated pretty simply: We have no choice. If the world intends to address the threat of global warming and still satisfy its growing appetite for electricity, it needs an ambitious expansion of nuclear power. Scientists agree that greenhouse gases, mainly carbon dioxide, are building up in the atmosphere and contributing to a gradual increase in global average temperatures. Nuclear power, of course, isn't the only answer. The Real Economics —Mr. Nuclear Debate Sizewell - The Debate – Read the Arguments FOR and AGAINST nuclear power.
Yes please? No thanks? For and against nuclear power - UK Politics - UK - The Independent. 1 Generating electricity by nuclear reactors does not produce carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas causing global warming and climate change. Britain's existing nuclear power plants reduce the nation's carbon emissions by between 7 and 14 per cent. 2 Building new nuclear power stations will ensure the nation retains control over its own sources of energy. Security of supply is essential in an unstable world where oil and gas comes mainly from regions that could hold Britain to ransom by threatening to disrupt supplies. 3 Nuclear power is a mature technology and has proven reliability. It has been developed over 50 years and the latest reactors are reliable, clean and efficient. The last 10 nuclear reactors to be built in the world have been delivered on time and to their budget. 4 Generating electricity by nuclear power is a 24/7 operation and is not subject to the vagaries of wind, sun or tides.
Five reasons against nuclear power 5 Nuclear power is not carbon free.