background preloader

Nuclear power arguments for and against

Facebook Twitter

Cyberphysics, the revision website. Arguments For And Against Nuclear Power Philosophy Essay. The title question of my case study is: 'Should Nuclear Power be Banned'.

Arguments For And Against Nuclear Power Philosophy Essay

I have chosen this question as I believe it is a key topic at this present moment in life, with a lot of information about it in the media, such as on the news and in the papers each day. Also it is something that will affect the life in which we live in the future. The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power - Playlist. The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Power - Playlist. Do you think we should build more nuclear power plants? Essay:Arguments against nuclear power. [edit] Nuclear waste The anti-nuclear movement is preoccupied with the problem of nuclear waste and its possible impact on the environment and health.

Essay:Arguments against nuclear power

Generation of nuclear waste, which is dangerous to all known forms of life, is a valid concern about nuclear power, and the problem must be addressed in an environmentally sound way. However, there is no reason to believe this problem is insoluble. Here are some claims made by the anti-nuclear movement in reference to the waste issue. More: Nuclear waste [edit] There is no solution The validity of this claim is highly dependent on your definition of "solution". If we define "solution" as something that lets humanity forget about the waste without adverse consequences at a cost that is a small portion of the price of generated electricity, then there are a few options. [edit] It will remain toxic for millions of years. For and Against - Nuclear energy in the UK. I come to this subject with some trepidation as, unlike most commentators, it is not one I get particularly het up about.

For and Against - Nuclear energy in the UK

While I have dedicated much of my life to reducing our impact on the planet, I am not a political Green. I have never owned a Citroën 2CV, I am not a veggie, and the only time I ever hugged a tree I felt like a right charlie.A significant amount of anti-nuclear sentiment is driven by an ideological, almost religious, belief that the technology is ‘evil’. But the fact that much of the criticism is irrational doesn’t mean that it is immune from rational critique. As an engineer I like to think I take a rational attitude to any technology. So can the currently becalmed UK nuclear energy rise again to become a sustainable energy solution?

The first meaning is sustainable in a practical sense. So where are we with ‘peak uranium’? A third, meaning of ‘sustainable’ is politically sustainable. Nuclear power debate. The nuclear power debate is a controversy[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] about the deployment and use of nuclear fission reactors to generate electricity from nuclear fuel for civilian purposes.

Nuclear power debate

The debate about nuclear power peaked during the 1970s and 1980s, when it "reached an intensity unprecedented in the history of technology controversies", in some countries.[12][13] Observers attribute the nuclear controversy to the impossibility of generating a shared perception between social actors over the use of this technology[10] as well as systemic mismatches between expectations and experience.[11] Proponents of nuclear energy argue that nuclear power is a sustainable energy source which reduces carbon emissions and can increase energy security if its use supplants a dependence on imported fuels.[14] Proponents advance the notion that nuclear power produces virtually no air pollution, in contrast to the chief viable alternative of fossil fuel. Two opposing camps[edit] Energy Security[edit] [edit] Ten Urgent Reasons to Reject Nuclear Power Now. Bags of radiation-contaminated materials, to be stored in a mountain, in Kawauchi, Japan, Nov. 16, 2012.

Ten Urgent Reasons to Reject Nuclear Power Now

With the slow pace of cleanup efforts, residents of Okuma, a town evacuated in the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi disaster, have become pessimistic about ever living there again. (Photo: Ko Sasaki / The New York Times) Many citizens do not want nuclear power. They know it is both far too dangerous and far too expensive. UK governments have largely supported nuclear power as well as nuclear weapons.

Many citizens do not want nuclear weapons because they know they are insanely dangerous, and they want to live without the constant threat of sudden and complete annihilation hanging over them and their children. The remedy is for us to wise up, get organized and then instruct the politicians to either do what we want - or join the job market. 1. At Fukushima we have the worst industrial disaster ever. International experts (e.g. 2. No to Nuclear Power.

GCSE Bitesize: Nuclear power stations. Pros and cons of nuclear power. As a result of the current discussion how further global warming could be prevented or at least mitigated, the revival of nuclear power seems to be in everybody's - or at least in many politician's - mind.

Pros and cons of nuclear power

It it interesting to see that in many suggestions to mitigate global warming, the focus is put on the advantages of nuclear power generation, its disadvantages are rarely mentioned. Hopefully, the following summary of arguments for and against nuclear power can fill this gap: Advantages of nuclear power generation: Nuclear power generation does emit relatively low amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2).

The emissions of green house gases and therefore the contribution of nuclear power plants to global warming is therefore relatively little.This technology is readily available, it does not have to be developed first.It is possible to generate a high amount of electrical energy in one single plant. Arguments for and against nuclear power — Debating Europe. Nuclear Power – Built on Facts. What do we think about nuclear power?

Nuclear Power – Built on Facts

Benjamin Cohen of The World’s Fair is not a fan. I am. Modern nuclear power has a lot going for it. In no particular order, here’s the reasons that appeal to me. It’s reliable. Which isn’t to say I don’t like other technologies as well. Daniel Koffler: Nuclear power should be a part of the candidates' energy policies. In keeping with the frenetic, rhetorical ping-pong that has marked virtually every moment of this young general election, Barack Obama gave a big energy policy speech in Las Vegas last month to counter the big energy speech John McCain gave just prior to it.

Daniel Koffler: Nuclear power should be a part of the candidates' energy policies

Obama proposed a substantial federal investment in alternative energy sources, including wind power, solar power and biofuels, and he promised to hike fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks (though he didn't say by how much). He has already proposed a cap-and-trade scheme with auctions for emissions permits, which are key to making any such scheme work. (John McCain's version of cap-and-trade does not include auctions.) Nuclear power, however, does not figure into Obama's proposed alternatives to reliance on petroleum. Now, to be clear, Obama's energy programme on the whole is a sound and long-overdue, if not terribly ambitious, adjustment in the US approach to fuelling its economy.

Devil's Advocate: 10 Green Arguments for Nuclear Power. Science Published on January 15th, 2008 | by Shirley Siluk Gregory January 15th, 2008 by Shirley Siluk Gregory I never thought I’d consider nuclear power a desirable solution to climate change until I read James Lovelock’s latest book, “The Revenge of Gaia: Earth’s Climate Crisis & the Fate of Humanity” (see my previous post on the issue here).

Devil's Advocate: 10 Green Arguments for Nuclear Power

Though I’m still not 100-percent convinced, Lovelock’s arguments are factual, rational and highly persuasive. So I thought I’d take a similar crack at making the case for nuclear energy as a way to help curb our greenhouse gas emissions … maybe in part to clarify my own mixed feelings about the matter. Here goes: 2. The Case For and Against Nuclear Power. (See Corrections and Amplifications item below.)

The Case For and Against Nuclear Power

Is nuclear power the answer for a warming planet? Or is it too expensive and dangerous to satisfy future energy needs? Interest in nuclear power is heating up, as the hunt intensifies for "green" alternatives to fossil fuels like coal and natural gas. Even some environmentalists have come on board, citing the severity of the global-warming threat to explain their embrace of the once-maligned power source. But the issue is far from settled. Nuclear Debate Sizewell - The Debate – Read the Arguments FOR and AGAINST nuclear power. Yes please? No thanks? For and against nuclear power - UK Politics - UK - The Independent. 1 Generating electricity by nuclear reactors does not produce carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas causing global warming and climate change. Britain's existing nuclear power plants reduce the nation's carbon emissions by between 7 and 14 per cent. 2 Building new nuclear power stations will ensure the nation retains control over its own sources of energy.

Security of supply is essential in an unstable world where oil and gas comes mainly from regions that could hold Britain to ransom by threatening to disrupt supplies. 3 Nuclear power is a mature technology and has proven reliability. It has been developed over 50 years and the latest reactors are reliable, clean and efficient.