Art numérique

Le tournant numérique de l'esthétique. The Creators Project. Rafaël Rozendaal – Official Website. Finger Battle, the simplest game in the universe, by Rafaël Rozendaal. Christophe Bruno. Fascinum - Christophe Bruno (2001) L’art assisté par ordinateur par Anne-Charlotte Philippe. [#DIGART] Why Your .JPEGs Aren't Making You A Millionaire.

This week we’re exploring the Digital Arts Market (or lack thereof).

We’re asking the tough questions: What will it take for a sustainable digital arts market to form? Is that even a possibility? Can the digital arts make money? And will they ever be incorporated into the contemporary arts dialogue? We invite you to participate in the discussion in the comments section, on your own blog (send us the link!) It’s time we get realistic about making money from selling internet art—it’s not going to happen. The commodification of internet art is not going to happen in the way the art market has traditionally operated or in any way currently being attempted. 1.

This is the way juggernauts like Google or Facebook operate. 2. Coined by WIRED’s Chris Anderson, Freemium is a term meant to imply general access to a site for free with additional features that come at a cost. 3. How about making a kooky video and asking for money from your friends on Kickstarter for a big new art project? 4. 5. #DigArt: We're Spending A Week Exploring The Digital Arts Market (Or Lack Thereof) This past week NYC hosted another string of art fairs: the first US installment of London’s Frieze, as well as several accompanying ancillary fairs, Pulse and NADA, which always seem to spring up around the behemoths, flocking like moths to the proverbial flame.

It was barely two months ago that the city welcomed the annual Armory Show, which came with its own entourage of some half-dozen smaller fairs, and this, in a city that New Yorker’s Peter Schjeldahl calls “a permanent art fair, with hundreds of galleries conveniently clustered in a few neighborhoods.” It’s no secret that recession or no recession, the art market is alive and well, thriving in fact, and bordering on bloated.

Each week seems to bring yet another headline about a work of art going for record sums at the auction houses. And yet, despite the gluttonous feast, the digital arts remain almost uniformly absent from the dinner table. It seems no one even bothered to invite them to the party. Y a-t-il des « faux » en art numérique ? La question du « faux » reste une vraie question, surtout dans la pratique artistique numérique qui se déploie sur les réseau sociaux.

On assiste actuellement à une massification de la duplication du contenu comme on peut le voir avec le glitch. Le glitch est l’emploi de caractères typographiques réutilisés, détournés, programmés pour s'afficher dans les statuts de Facebook ou Twitter sous formes de symboles et de motifs graphiques. Et, bien évidemment, ces statuts se retrouvent rapidement copiés-collés et diffusés. Sur les réseaux sociaux, je communique régulièrement sur mon travail en faisant des rappels, des échos, des mentions sur l’origine de mes œuvres. J’ai crée et vendu un faux profil de Marcel Duchamp ; ce compte est bloqué et seul le collectionneur a accès à son contenu grâce aux codes de connexion.

Par rapport à ma pratique personnelle, un « faux » ne serait pas la conception du profil Facebook d’un artiste décédé mais plutôt cette conception faite en mon nom ! [#DIGART] 10 New Media Tumblrs To Follow Religiously. This week we’re exploring the Digital Arts Market (or lack thereof).

We’re asking the tough questions: What will it take for a sustainable digital arts market to form? Is that even a possibility? Can the digital arts make money? And will they ever be incorporated into the contemporary arts dialogue? We invite you to participate in the discussion in the comments section, on your own blog (send us the link!) Even for those of us who spend the majority of our days hunting around the strange corners of the internet, it can still hold plenty of surprises.