AVENIR DE L'INTERNET
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Le Web 3.0 : état des lieux et perspectives d'avenir
Voici un intéressant travail d'étudiants de l'Université de Limoges, réalisé sous la direction d'un de leurs enseignants qui nous a aimablement proposé de publier cette étude qui fait bien le tour du sujet traité : le Web 3. Travail universitaire, réalisé selon les normes des synthèses universtaires. Nous n'avons pas voulu modifier le système des références ni leur présentation.
01Business le 16/10/09 à 16h46 sommaire Le Web 2.0 fait une entrée timide dans les entreprises et voilà qu'on annonce le 3.0. Que se cache-t-il derrière cette nouvelle version ? Un buzzword marketing ?
Que nous prépare le web 3.0 ? web sémantique ubiquitaire symbiotique temps réel 3d internet des objets web squared
VISIONS LIMITEES
« More on RDF++ | Main | I don't mean to get off on a rant here... » Microformats, Web 3.0, etc. I came across this blog entry and as much as I don't want to take part in the "Web 3.0" debate I want to clarify the following: The so-called "lowercase semantic web" represents a misunderstanding of what's important about the Semantic Web, namely the requirements for a uniform metamodel for data that allows schemata to be extended , and accessible, declarative semantics.
Wilbur-and-O: Microformats, Web 3.0, etc.
Over at Read/Write web, definitely one of the better site discussing developments on the web, Alex Iskold had published “the road to the semantic web” , prompted by the recent New York Times article (free registration etc possibly required) on the Semantic web (where they use the web 3.0 moniker, sigh). Iskold gives a sizeable chunk of his discussion over to microformats, and does a good job of contextualizing them in relation to other semantic web projects. He raises the criticism that the current set of microformats does not cover many things that we encounter online. For example, we are not aware of a format that would help represent a book or a movie. Many more formats need to be created before they can really “cover” the web . I am aware that this is a point of debate, perhaps not entirely explicit, within the microformats community.