Conference Presentations. Gadgets, Gadgets, Gadgets. Jaakkokeskarin palsta. Jaakon web2.0. Tommin web2.0. Keski-Espoon kirjaston Web 2.0. Wanhakeskari Keski-Espoon kirjasto. Using Web 2.0 Principles to Become Librarian 2.0 on Squidoo. Library 2.0 Spectrum on Flickr. Internet Librarian International Presentations. New LibGuides Features and Functionalities. Platform | Talis Developer Network. Delicious, indeed. Suggested raw materials for your mash up. Keski-Espoon kirjaston Web 2.0. Keski-Espoon kirjaston Web 2.0. Tämä on blogi Tämä on blogiteksti. Blogissa on usein paljon muutakin tavaraa ilahduttamassa lukijaa ja tuomassa lukijalle informaatiota, jonka blogin tekijä uskoo kiinnostavan lukijaansa. Blogiteksti on kuitenkin blogin sydän. Jos blogin tekijällä ei ole mitään sanottavaa, myös sivupalkin syötteet, linkkilistat ja muut ohekkeet jäävät vaille käyttäjää. Blogitekstit kulkevat ylhäältä alaspäin, eli uusin teksti on ylimpänä ja vanhemmat sen alapuolella.
Asiasanoittaminen eli tagittaminen yhdistää monia web 2.0 -nimeen liittyviä palveluita. Nettisivua päivitetään, eli vanhentunutta informaatiota korvataan uudella. Uusien blogitekstien seuraamista helpottaa, kun voin tilata uudet viestit syötteinä lukuohjelmaani. Miksi kirjoitan blogia? Elävä blogi tarvitsee yleisön. Olen tutustunut viime aikoina niin moneen palveluun, hankkinut käyttäjätunnukset ja salasanat, että en millään pystyisi muistamaan ja hallitsemaan niitä, jollen sitoisi niitä johonkin. Miten joku löytää blogitekstini? Directory of Experimental Library Tools. Library 2.0: The road ahead. It does seems somewhat arbitrary that a term like "Library 2.0" can be coined, snatched up, and tossed about like a hacky-sack at Burning Man. I agree that it's not quite the right label, but to be honest, I really don't care--if we're arguing over semantics, we've been derailed.
So as I use the term "Library 2.0" (L2), bear in mind that it's only a way for me to refer to a collective of ideas. Essentially, those of us who are familiar with the term "Library 2.0" all assemble in the same theoretical nebulae when we read and talk about it, and that's good enough for me. For the moment. But there is the real danger of getting mired in discussions like 'what does it mean to be Library 2.0ish'. Ongoing discussion: What is Library 2.0? What are our current impediments? But vendors are not the only impediments to L2. A perfect example, that has been discussed a little, is the fact that many librarians wish they had coders to implement their ideas. How do we overcome those impediments? My Top-ten Library 2.0 “No-brainers” for Public Libraries « The Other Librarian. This is fairly straight-forward post. I was thinking about Library/Web 2.0 applications, hearing about projects that seemed to some to be a bit dubious or misguided and occassionally finding people being a bit dismissive in general about Web/Library 2.0.
I have sympathy with some of the Web/Library 2.0 skepticism. Not everyone has the resources, inclination or knowledge-base to develop high-powered services on Second Life or to design library based mash-ups and the like. So, I thought I’d distill library 2.0 into 10 projects that I say are pretty much “no-brainers.” These are 10 things that are: Low riskLow costLow effortSure to provide added benefit to a good number of userspretty much just common sense service enhancements ANDnot likely to ruffle [needlessly] many technophobe feathers In my view, if you do these 10 things (or some reasonable facimile) you have satisficed the Library 2.0 moniker sufficiently to say you are “L2.” Here they are: 1. Why is it L2? Why would my users want it? 2. St. Joseph County Public Library. LibGuides. E-bibliotek.se** Fråga Biblioteket. Two clever libraries.