What same-sex "marriage" has done to Massachusetts - 2012. By Brian Camenker October 2008 Updated June 2012 Anyone who thinks that same-sex "marriage" is a benign eccentricity which won't affect the average person should consider what it has done to Massachusetts since 2004.
It's become a hammer to force the acceptance and normalization of homosexuality on everyone. The slippery slope is real. New radical demands never cease. What has happened in the last several years is truly frightening. In this article: On November 18, 2003, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court announced its Goodridge opinion, declaring that it was unconstitutional not to allow same-sex "marriage. " The public schools The homosexual "marriage" onslaught in public schools across the state started soon after the November 2003 court ruling.
At my own children's high school there was a school-wide assembly to celebrate same-sex "marriage" in early December 2003. Public health The Commissioner of the Mass. Hospitals Domestic violence Business and employment.
TalkOrigins Archive: Exploring the Creation/Evolution Controversy. A Scientific Defense of a Creationist Position on Evolution. Evolution. A Critique of PBS's Evolution. 100 Scientists, National Poll Challenge Darwinism Monday, September 24, 2001 Contact: Mark Edwards 206.292.0401 x107 / firstname.lastname@example.org SEATTLE--In an ironic greeting to the seven-part public television series "Evolution" that begins tonight, 100 scientists have declared that they "are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life.
" The signers say, "Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged. " Discovery Institute, a Seattle-based public policy center, compiled the list of statement signers (attached). Among other things, the long list may help to answer the contention of designated spokespeople for the series "Evolution" that "virtually all reputable scientists in the world" support Darwin's theory. Chemist and five time Nobel nominee, Henry "Fritz" Schaefer of the University of Georgia, commented on the need to encourage debate on Darwin's theory of evolution.
The Scientific Case Against Evolution. By Robert Locke I AM NOT A CREATIONIST, and must confess that until recently, I treated people who questioned evolution with polite dismissal.
But there has recently emerged a major trend in biology that has been suppressed in the mainstream media: evolution is in trouble. More importantly, this has absolutely nothing to do with religion but is due to the fact that the ongoing growth of biological knowledge keeps producing facts that contradict rather than confirm evolution. These two books—Michael Denton's Evolution: A Theory in Crisis and Michael J. —describe this phenomenon. The first surprising thing Denton points out is that there has always been a dissident faction of highly distinguished scientists, of impeccable credentials and no religious motivations, who have declined to concede that evolution has been proved. The first big problem with evolution is that the fossil record increasingly does not, honestly viewed, support it, a fact that famous Prof. And Who Was Adam?
Nutrition. Activism. Environmental. Abortion. Abducted generations? In the 1950’s, 60’s and 70’s, being an unwed mother carried a significant stigma in America.
It’s now called the “baby scoop” era and during this time young women -- usually in their teens -- were either hidden at home, sent to live with distant relatives or quietly dispatched to maternity homes to give birth. Estimates are as many as 1.5 million young mothers who say they were forced -- some just minutes after delivery -- to hand over their babies for adoption during this period. It was a decision that they seldom made on their own. Mostly, it was preordained by the young woman’s church or her parents. Often too, it was a decision that was dictated by the social customs of the time because having a baby out of wedlock was seen as a disgrace to a family. [Related: Adopted or abducted?]
Last month I interviewed two people with very different stories to tell that suggests perhaps some of the policies and practices of the past that led to forced adoptions lingered into the 80’s and beyond. Animal Rights Facts = Animal Rights Exposed.