Nzclimatescience.net - Science. Posted 26 April 2016 A new book by one of our Coalition foundation member scientists, Dr Gerrit van der Lingen, has been reviewed by the distinguished Dutch scientist, Dr Hans Labohm, who writes: "All in all, 'The Fable of a Stable Climate' shows a wide and solid knowledge of the subject.
Moreover, Gerrit van der LIngen has the talent to clearly explain the complicated problems, whch makes his writings very accessible for a broad public. In other words: his book reads like a riveting novel. The book has 418 pages and many illustrations and graphs, as well as extensive reference lists. The book, both paperback and KIndle, can be ordered here: Dr Labohm concludes: "In my opinion, this book is mandatory reading for climatophiles of all denominations. " Read flyer of book here Read review here. About NIPCC - Climate Change ReconsideredClimate Change Reconsidered. The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to present a comprehensive, authoritative, and realistic assessment of the science and economics of global warming.
Because it is not a government agency, and because its members are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent “second opinion” of the evidence reviewed – or not reviewed – by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming. History The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, or NIPCC, as its name suggests, is an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. NIPCC has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency. Publications In 2008, Dr. Gwhoaxborn. SePP Home Page. CO2 Science. Home - Climate Change ReconsideredClimate Change Reconsidered. Global Warming Petition Project. A project of CFACT. The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change.
Global Warming $22B Scam. Oil Simulation, Climate Modeling and the Scientific Method. Part I concerned a WSJ essay by Robert J.
Caprara, “Confessions of a Computer Modeler”. In Part II I will share what I know about computer modeling in oil and gas applications, and raise questions about climate modeling. This is a long post, offered for your reading enjoyment this holiday weekend. I’ll start with the conclusions so we can see where we’re going… Conclusions As an oil company engineer, I’ve got a life-sized picture what would have happened if I had: Put a significant dent in the corporateô budget studying and modeling a reservoir system;Spent years convincing management of the model’s validity and the dire consequences of ignoring its warnings;Proposed millions of dollars of new drilling and facilities upgrades based on the model’s conclusions.
Then, when observations deviate significantly from the model’s forecasts, I: – I would have been out of a job, that’s what. Image from International Reservoir Technologies, Inc. Modeling Oil and Gas Reservoirs History match. Dr. List of scientists opposing the idea of AGW. A majority of earth and climate scientists are convinced by the evidence that humans are significantly contributing to global warming.[1][2] This is a list of notable scientists who have made statements that conflict with the mainstream scientific understanding of global warming as summarized by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and endorsed by other scientific bodies.
Establishing the mainstream scientific assessment, climate scientists agree that the global average surface temperature has risen over the last century. The scientific consensus and scientific opinion on climate change were summarized in the 2001 Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The main conclusions on global warming were as follows: These findings are recognized by the national science academies of all the major industrialized nations.[7] Peer review Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections. Climate Change Reconsidered. Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Scientists Skeptical Of GW Crisis.
The world's most viewed site on global warming and climate change. Sixteen Concerned Scientists: No Need to Panic About Global Warming. Penn & Teller : Crap - Global Warming. How the Global Warming Scare Began.