Réseaux sociaux de chercheurs

Facebook Twitter
De plus en plus de débats et de questions apparaissent autour de la notion des réseaux sociaux recherche et de l'utilisation de ces réseaux par / pour les scientifiques : Quelles sont les pratiques des réseaux sociaux par les chercheurs?Quelles particularités des réseaux sociaux recherche par rapport à d’autres réseaux sociaux et pour quels usages ?Quelles utilisations des réseaux sociaux scientifiques de type Academia.edu ou ResearchGate?Quelle articulation entre réseaux sociaux recherche et archives ouvertes ?Quels risques et quels avantages pour les chercheurs et pour les communautés ?

Réseaux sociaux pour les chercheurs - A lire ou à relire | CORIST-SHS

Réseaux sociaux pour les chercheurs - A lire ou à relire | CORIST-SHS
Les réseaux sociaux pour chercheurs: une illusion? Les réseaux sociaux pour chercheurs: une illusion? Un récent débat autour du libre accès aux données et publications scientifiques et d’un réseau social pour chercheurs [] m’a poussé à me poser une question que j’ai déjà effleurée ici ou là. Des réseaux sociaux spécifiques aux chercheurs ont-ils une quelconque utilité pour les chercheurs? Qu’apportent-ils de plus que les outils sociaux génériques comme twitter, facebook ou des logiciels avec couche social comme Google Drive, par exemple? Contexte du débat En faisant une simple recherche sur un moteur de recherche, en anglais comme en français, on trouve assez facilement des références sur le sujet. À THATCamp Paris 2012, une session avait été organisée sur le sujet.
Can ResearchGate really be the Facebook of science? — European technology news Can ResearchGate really be the Facebook of science? — European technology news Ijad Madisch, the CEO and co-founder of Berlin startup ResearchGate, likes to work with hard evidence. Perhaps it’s no surprise for the Harvard-trained virologist, who traded in a promising medical research career to launch the social network for scientists. But still, in a world where the impact of social networks is usually measured by how many news headlines they can generate, he prefers success stories that have a more direct impact.
Scientific social networks are the future of science | @ccess “@ccess to knowledge is a fundamental human right “ Peter Murray-Rust Since ancient times, information has always been passed on orally or on paper. In terms of information technology, information on paper is compartmentalized. Finding information is often synonymous with finding the right book or publication. Books mostly give a more or less complete picture, and any links to other works are often just there for reference purposes. Scientific social networks are the future of science | @ccess
Photos du mur
Scientific social networks are the future of science | @ccess
Quel réseau social pour les chercheurs en histoire ? par Frédéric Clavert [Ceci est un "guest post" de Frédéric Clavert. Historien, il a soutenu sa thèse sur Hjalmar Schacht, financier et diplomate 1930-1950 en 2006 et l’a publiée chez PIE-PeterLang (Bruxelles) en 2009.

Quel réseau social pour les chercheurs en histoire ?

Twitter for Research by on Prezi
A recent article from the Huffington Post states that social networks for scientists won’t work because there is no incentive from a career perspective. The piece focuses on ResearchGate and takes a stab at the Economist’s article about the community. Here at Comprendia, we’ve never advocated that Facebook should be recreated for scientists, as there are 700,000+ life science graduates in the US already using the application,* and they are likely already connected there to lab mates and colleagues. What Is A Scientific Social Network? 6 Thriving and Inspiring Examples | Biotechnology and Life Science Marketing Consulting: Comprendia What Is A Scientific Social Network? 6 Thriving and Inspiring Examples | Biotechnology and Life Science Marketing Consulting: Comprendia
The unlimited scholarly publication As we have previously noted, traditional journals often have limits on the number of files that you can put into the paper, even as supplemental information.The use of figshare to break open the restraints of current traditional publishing models has been demonstrated this week in a publication in PLoS ONE: Roberts SB, Hauser L, Seeb LW, Seeb JE (2012) Development of Genomic Resources for Pacific Herring through Targeted Transcriptome Pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 7(2): e30908. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030908 The unlimited scholarly publication
The Modern Language Association likes to keep up with the times. As we all know, some information breaks first or only on Twitter and a good academic needs to be able to cite those sources. So, the MLA has devised a standard format that you should keep in mind. Its form is:

How Do You Cite a Tweet in an Academic Paper? - Alexis Madrigal - Technology

How Do You Cite a Tweet in an Academic Paper? - Alexis Madrigal - Technology
Article: Academic Networking 2.0: Historians and Social Media « INFOdocket Article: Academic Networking 2.0: Historians and Social Media « INFOdocket Article Academic Networking 2.0: Historians and Social Media Author
Mark Drapeau: Social Networks for Scientists Won't Work A "Facebook for Scientists"? It may sound silly, or redundant, but it's becoming more of a reality. Maybe. A new startup based in Germany named ResearchGate has already convinced roughly 1.4 million researchers to become members and begin sharing. On it, you can search your email accounts to find people you know, read PDF documents of research papers, and chat with others about why a particular lab technique isn't working for you. Mark Drapeau: Social Networks for Scientists Won't Work
Soon after Nature Network launched in 2007 it was being touted as the “Facebook for scientists”. Other sites that had been around longer, such as FriendFeed and LabSpaces, occasionally got that moniker too (and indeed Facebook bought out FriendFeed later on). I view any use of the phrase “Facebook for scientists” with great suspicion. At least Mendeley (the social and bibliographic management site) has the imagination to call themselves the Last.FM for science. Brian Krueger, at LabSpaces, suggested why none of these sites have become dominant in the way that FaceBook has: ResearchGate’s groups and Job listings appear to be relatively active, Nature Network has its blogs and forum, and LabSpaces has the news and Blogs. “Facebook for scientists” | Trading Knowledge
Les réseaux sociaux scientifiques : différences d’approches suivant les disciplines
Type to search for People, Research Interests and Universities Searching... Join a growing community of 6,508,860 researchers Academia.edu is a place to share and follow research Share your papers See analytics on your profile and papers

Academia.edu - Share research