background preloader

Multilevel Model of Health

Facebook Twitter

Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature. 82 Nadalin Monday. Reproductive History and Cancer Risk. Colditz GA, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM. Breast cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, editors. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Russo J, Moral R, Balogh GA, Mailo D, Russo IH. The protective role of pregnancy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research 2005; 7(3):131–142. About the Run - CIBC Run for the Cure. In 1992, a small group of volunteers began a movement in Toronto’s High Park. That day they brought together 1,500 people to raise awareness and $85,000 for breast cancer.

This marked the beginning of what was to become Canada’s largest single day, volunteer-led event in support of the breast cancer cause, the CIBC Run for the Cure. Today, the event has over 80,000 participants and raises $16 million annually in communities across Canada. In 1997, the trailblazing partnership between the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF) and CIBC began. On February 1, 2017, CBCF and the Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) joined forces under the CCS banner. Together, CCS, CIBC and thousands of dedicated Canadians continue to raise vital funds for breast cancer through this signature event.

We are grateful to CIBC, their employees and clients for their longstanding support, and to the countless volunteers, participants and donors that are helping to change the future of breast cancer. Andrea Seale. Willow Breast Cancer Support & Resource Services. New Rapid Diagnostic and Breast Support Clinic opens at Osler. An innovative new clinic at Osler will help patients with breast cancer get diagnosed and start treatment sooner. The new Rapid Diagnostic and Breast Support Clinic, which launched at Brampton Civic on March 23 and Etobicoke General on March 24, expands on our existing oncology and breast programs by bringing together clinicians from Osler's surgery, oncology, diagnostic imaging and pathology teams.

Patients also have access to a Nurse Navigator, who can help guide them through the clinic and their treatment plans. Together, this multidisciplinary team will reduce wait times by streamlining the diagnostics and treatment processes, and will continue to provide care to patients screened at Osler so they don't need to seek treatment elsewhere. Our goal is to reduce the wait time from mammogram to surgery to 30 days, from the provincial average of 64 days. The clinic is operated in partnership with Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) and is the first program of this kind in Ontario. Breast Cancer | The Cancer Atlas. Access creates progress: Lauby-Secretan B, Scoccianti C, Loomis D, et al. Breast-cancer screening – viewpoint of the IARC Working Group. New Engl J Med. 2015;372:2353–2358. Text: Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424.

Carioli G, Malvezzi M, Rodriguez T, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Carioli G, Malvezzi M, Rodriguez T, Bertuccio P, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Verdial FC, Etzioni R, Duggan C, Anderson BO. Map and Figures 1 and 2: Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, et al. Figure 3: Five-year moving average. Ferlay J, Colombet M and Bray F. Figure 4: Five-year moving average. World Health Organization Cancer Mortality Database, Health Literacy and Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Canadian women, with the exception of non-melanoma skin cancer. While it can also be found in men, male breast cancer is a very rare occurrence. Breast cancer starts in the cells of the mammary gland. Breast tissue covers a larger area than just the breast, extending up to the collarbone and from the armpit to the breastbone. In 2019 an estimated 26,900 Canadian women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 5,000 will die of it.Breast cancer accounts for approximately 25% of new cases of cancer and 13% of all cancer deaths in Canadian women.1 in 8 women are expected to develop breast cancer during her lifetime and 1 in 33 will die of it.Almost all breast cancers start in the glandular tissue of the breast and are known as adenocarcinomas.

Cancer cells may start within the ducts (ductal carcinoma) or lobules (lobular carcinoma). Please refer to the Breast Cancer in Canada infographic for more information. Risk Factors Managing Breast Cancer. Breast cancer statistics - Canadian Cancer Society. Breast cancer is the most common cancer among Canadian women (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers). It is the second leading cause of death from cancer in Canadian women. Breast cancer can also occur in men, but it is not common. Incidence and mortality Incidence is the number of new cases of cancer. Mortality is the number of deaths due to cancer. It is estimated that in 2019: 26,900 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer. Trends in breast cancer The breast cancer incidence rate in women in Canada rose between 1984 and 1991. The increase until the early 1990s occurred partly because mammography was used more often, which meant that more cases of breast cancer were found.

The slight decrease in rate in 2002 coincided with a large drop in the use of HRT among postmenopausal women when its role in breast cancer was publicized. The breast cancer death rate peaked in 1986 and has been declining since. Chances (probability) of developing or dying from breast cancer mammography. Breast Cancer – Cancer Care Ontario. There are several things that can lower your risk of breast cancer: Limit the Amount of Alcohol You Drink For breast cancer, there is no safe limit for drinking alcohol.

Even drinking small amounts of alcohol can raise your risk. Compared with no drinks a day, each daily alcoholic drink raises your risk of getting breast cancer by almost 10%. Maintain a Healthy Weight If you are not at a healthy weight, losing even a small amount of weight can help lower the risk to your health. Stay Active Being physically active can improve your health, well-being and quality of life, and lower your risk of cancer. Being “active” does not mean just formal exercise programs — lots of everyday activities, such as gardening, housework, walking to work or the store, or dancing, also count. Talk to Your Doctor About the Benefits and Risks of Birth Control Pills and Hormone Replacement Therapy Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) may be used to treat the symptoms of menopause, like hot flashes.

Cancer in Canada: Focus on Lung, Colorectal, Breast and Prostate. View the most recent version. Archived Content Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please "contact us" to request a format other than those available. This page has been archived on the Web. Cancer in Canada: Focus on Lung, Colorectal, Breast and Prostate Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 82-624-Xby Tanya Navaneelan and Teresa Janz Highlights Prostate cancer accounts for the largest number of newly diagnosed cases. Cancer is not one disease, but a general term that represents many diseases, each one with its own distinct characteristics and outcomes. While all types of cancer are important (see Appendix 1 for statistics on other cancers), this article examines some basic trends in the four most commonly diagnosed types of cancer in Canada: lung, colorectal, breast and prostate.

Lung cancer Colorectal cancer. Public Health Action Model for Cancer Survivorship. The Determination of Health Across the Life Course and Across Levels of Influence » SPH. In the first part of this Dean’s Note, I suggested that a life course perspective can be a useful and essential organizing approach for population health science. I have, in previous work, suggested that life course approaches and multilevel approaches may be the two most important paradigmatic shifts in population health science in recent decades. Building then on the first part of this note, here I comment on multilevel approaches.

A multilevel approach to population health is predicated on the understanding that exposures at many levels of organization work together to produce health outcomes. These exposures are positioned both up and downstream of individual-level risk factors [see Figure 1] and include determinants of population health that are social, biological, geographic, political, and temporal in nature. Figure 1. Importantly, multilevel perspectives do not simply “add” isolated “risk factors” at other levels of influence to our prediction models. Figure 2. Figure 3. Sandro. Social Ecological Model Offers New Approach to Public Health | The Borgen Project. People do not act in isolation, which is why it is important to understand the ways they interact with their communities and environments, in order to determine why they do what they do.

One way of measuring these networks of interactions is the Social Ecological Model. This model, developed by sociologists in the 1970s, studies how behaviors form based on characteristics of individuals, communities, nations and levels in between. In examining these intervals and how they interact and overlap, public health experts can develop strategies to promote wellbeing in the U.S. and abroad.

The Social Ecological Model is broad in scope. Each level overlaps with other levels. Different organizations use variations of the Social Ecological Model organizational hierarchies in a given society. Individual: An individual’s various traits and identities make up this level of the Social Ecological Model. SCC allows individuals and communities to influence shaping fairer, healthier societies.

Ecological Model. What makes some students, faculty, and staff healthy and others unhealthy? How can we create a campus community in which everyone has a chance to be healthy and live long, healthy lives? Healthy Campus 2020 explores these questions by emphasizing an ecological approach to improve student, faculty, and staff health. An ecological approach focuses on both population-level and individual-level determinants of health and interventions. It considers issues that are community-based and not just individually focused (National Association of Student Personnel Administrators [NASPA], 2004, p. 3).

Health is determined by influences at multiple levels (e.g., public policy, community, institutional, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors) (McLeroy, Bibeau, Steckler & Glanz, 1988, p. 355). Campus ecology provides a multifaceted view of the connections among health, learning, productivity, and campus structure. Public policy — Local, state, national, and global laws and policies. References U.S. Multi-level Modeling | The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project Monograph. It is well known that there are substantial area variations in mortality rates in the U.S. However, the presence of area differences in mortality does not necessarily mean that area matters.

Area variations in mortality can be observed due to a number of reasons some of which may be due to characteristics that relate to areas and others that relate to the characteristics of the individuals who live in these areas. Disentangling the two sources of variation (e.g.: individual and area) in mortality is therefore vital to distinguishing area differences from the difference that area makes. Such an approach to examining area variations in mortality, consequently, entails describing the patterning and causes in mortality variations, which in turn, requires answering the following empirical questions preferably in a sequential manner.

Before we outline the questions, it is worth asking what role could places or areas play in influencing mortality (and indeed other health outcomes). Hox J.