background preloader

Spirituality

Facebook Twitter

The Blog : Morality Without “Free Will” From the Free Press: A belief in free will touches nearly everything that human beings value. It is difficult to think about law, politics, religion, public policy, intimate relationships, morality—as well as feelings of remorse or personal achievement—without first imagining that every person is the true source of his or her thoughts and actions. And yet the facts tell us that free will is an illusion.

In this enlightening book, Sam Harris argues that this truth about the human mind does not undermine morality or diminish the importance of social and political freedom, but it can and should change the way we think about some of the most important questions in life. In this elegant and provocative book, Sam Harris demonstrates—with great intellectual ferocity and panache—that free will is an inherently flawed and incoherent concept, even in subjective terms. Free will is an illusion so convincing that people simply refuse to believe that we don’t have it. BibleContradictions-ReasonProject.png (PNG εικόνα, 3327x4418 εικονοστοιχεία) State of the Nation. The first incorrect assumption I would like to address is the topic of "belief": Atheism is a belief system.

Atheism is not a belief system because there isn't anything we are "believing" that could be considered a "system. " Atheism doesn't join people together in a common ideology like religions do because atheists share nothing in common, except their lack of belief in 1 specific thing. Imagine trying to label other groups based on their lack of belief in 1 specific thing.

You'd have the "Non-bigfoot-believers" and the "Non-mermaid-believers" and the "Non-magic-believers". In a way, people will get into a discussion of semantics of whether atheism is a "belief" or not, but really that is only because it is possible to state the any negative belief as a belief in the negative, which kinda works in english even if it doesn't exactly convey the position.

But the things I don't believe are infinite. Don't believe me? Do you believe that there is a pink unicorn in front of you right now? The Four Horsemen HD: Hour 1 of 2 - Discussions with Richard Dawkins, Ep 1. AJU God Debate: Sam Harris vs. Rabbi David Wolpe, pt. 1. The 25 Most Influential Living Atheists. Go back a few hundred years, and atheism was very much a minority position. Those who were atheists would have been ostracized by society and possibly even killed (as in burned at the stake, depending on how far back you go). Fast forward to the present, and atheism is far less objectionable, and in some circles even the dominant view. In the new millennium, prominent atheists abound.

One website, www.celebatheists.com, is even dedicated to listing celebrity atheists. Celebrity atheists are wide-ranging and include people like Mark Zuckerberg, Lance Armstrong, and Jodie Foster. Even so, they don’t make it on to our list of influential living atheists. To make it on SuperScholar’s list of influential living atheists, an atheist can’t merely disbelieve in God but also must actively encourage others to disbelieve in God. Many of the scholars listed here have given new life to atheism, inviting the term “neo-atheism” to describe their impact and movement. 1. More info: Wikipedia, Homepage. Daniel C. Dennett on What Should Replace Religions?