pearltrees html popular pearltrees search

Climategate

< Debate about climate change <

http://www.objectifliberte.fr/2008/02/rchauffement-cl.html Objectif Liberté: Réchauffement climatique : le GIEC, un organis (...) The disappearance of the IPCC in disgrace is not only desirable but inevitable.

http://www.objectifliberte.fr/2009/11/explosif-les-ordinateurs-du-hadley-center-pirates.html Si c'est authentifié, et même real climate semble le reconnaître, c'est un gigantesque climategate qui se profile. Objectif Liberté: Réchauffement climatique: explosion d'une bomb

Je vous ai évoqué Samedi la naissance d'un Climategate , à partir d'un fichier piraté au "Climate Research Unit" contenant des mels et des documents "chauds". http://www.objectifliberte.fr/2009/11/climategate-2-nouvelles-revelations.html Objectif Liberté: ClimateGate (2): Nouvelles révélations toujour

Objectif Liberté: Climategate (3) : le pitoyable traitement de l http://www.objectifliberte.fr/2009/11/climategate-3.html Les précédents articles : ClimateGate 1 (révélation) | ClimateGate 2 (confirmation)

Objectif Liberté: Réchauffement climatique : le GIEC, un organis

http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/international/article/climategate-4-nouveaux-elements-65865 Quelques brefs télégrammes dans la foulée des révélations du ClimateGate, dont vous pouvez suivre les épisodes précédents : ClimateGate 1 (révélation de l’affaire) | ClimateGate 2 (analyse plus complète des mels) | ClimateGate 3 (réaction des médias et lignes de défense des scientifiques incriminés par les mails) ------------- Scoop : le réchauffement en Nouvelle Zélande est bel et bien multiplié par 15 à cause de l’action humaine ! ClimateGate 4 : nouveaux éléments, nouvelles fraudes mises à jou

ClimateGate Who's Who

Réchauffement climatique : les erreurs du Giec - Partie 1/6 - un

The great climate change science scandal - Times Online Last updated December 29 2011 11:47 AM http://www.timesplus.co.uk/tto/news/?login=false&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Ftto%2Fenvironment%2F

But the question which inevitably arises from this systematic refusal to release their data is – what is it that these scientists seem so anxious to hide? The second and most shocking revelation of the leaked documents is how they show the scientists trying to manipulate data through their tortuous computer programmes, always to point in only the one desired direction – to lower past temperatures and to "adjust" recent temperatures upwards, in order to convey the impression of an accelerated warming. This comes up so often (not least in the documents relating to computer data in the Harry Read Me file) that it becomes the most disturbing single element of the entire story. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/6679082/Climate-change-this-is-the-worst-scientific-scandal-of-our-generation.html Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our gene

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703499404574559630382048494.html Climate Change Emails Reveal Rigged 'Consensus' - WSJ.com Associated Press The Australian Antarctic research station Casey, where scientists study the effects of climate change.

Columnists / Christopher Caldwell - A climate of suspicion Portfolio The FT.com Portfolio tool is designed to let you track, manage, and make decisions on your equity holdings. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/48e14e6c-dba0-11de-9424-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1231673/Global-warming-Dont-wait-The-Earth-tricks-carbon-count-control.html Look at the facts. Global warming? Don't wait up! The Earth has her own tricks to k

The BBC and Climategate: was a reporter put under pressure to ig This has led to suspicions that the scandal was ignored because it ran counter to what critics say is the BBC’s unquestioning acceptance in many of its programmes that man-made climate change is destroying the planet. But hang on – wasn't Paul Hudson the "climate change correspondent" who, as I reported on October 11, filed a story reporting that global warming stopped in 1998 ? I wrote at the time: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100018243/the-bbc-and-climategate-was-a-reporter-put-under-pressure-to-ignore-the-story/

BBC weatherman ¿ignored¿ leaked climate row emails | Mail Online http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1231763/BBC-weatherman-ignored-leaked-climate-row-emails.html Despite the explosive nature of some of the messages – which revealed apparent attempts by the CRU’s head, Professor Phil Jones, to destroy global temperature data rather than give it to scientists with opposing views – Paul Hudson failed to report the story. This has led to suspicions that the scandal was ignored because it ran counter to what critics say is the BBC’s unquestioning acceptance in many of its programmes that man-made climate change is destroying the planet.

Pretending the climate email leak isn't a crisis won't make it g http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/nov/25/monbiot-climate-leak-crisis-response I have seldom felt so alone.

AFP: Climat: une affaire de courriels piratés secoue le Congrès

Climategate : le climatologue mis en cause se met en congé | Rue

Climategate: premiers éléments sur l'origine des fuites | Rue89

Climate sceptics claim leaked emails are evidence of collusion a

The warmist conspiracy: the emails that most damn Jones | Herald

Manipulations de données par des chercheurs du GIEC ?

Climategate