background preloader

Algebraic combinatorics

Facebook Twitter

Bell number. In combinatorial mathematics, the Bell numbers count the number of partitions of a set. These numbers have been studied by mathematicians since the 19th century, and their roots go back to medieval Japan, but they are named after Eric Temple Bell, who wrote about them in the 1930s. Starting with B0 = B1 = 1, the first few Bell numbers are: The nth of these numbers, Bn, counts the number of different ways to partition a set that has exactly n elements, or equivalently, the number of equivalence relations on it.

Outside of mathematics, the same number also counts the number of different rhyme schemes for n-line poems.[1] What these numbers count[edit] Set partitions[edit] Partitions of sets can be arranged in a partial order, showing that each partition of a set of size n "uses" one of the partitions of a set of size n-1. The 52 partitions of a set with 5 elements In general, Bn is the number of partitions of a set of size n. . { {a}, {b}, {c} } { {a}, {b, c} } { {b}, {a, c} } { {c}, {a, b} } Here, . Stirling numbers of the second kind. The 15 partitions of a 4-element set ordered in a Hasse diagram There are S(4,1),...

,S(4,4) = 1,7,6,1 partitions containing 1,2,3,4 sets. In mathematics, particularly in combinatorics, a Stirling number of the second kind (or Stirling partition number) is the number of ways to partition a set of n objects into k non-empty subsets and is denoted by or Stirling numbers of the second kind are one of two kinds of Stirling numbers, the other kind being called Stirling numbers of the first kind (or Stirling cycle numbers). Definition[edit] The Stirling numbers of the second kind, written or with other notations, count the number of ways to partition a set of n labelled objects into k nonempty unlabelled subsets. They can be calculated using the following explicit formula:[2] Notation[edit] Various notations have been used for Stirling numbers of the second kind. Bell numbers[edit] The sum over the values for k of the Stirling numbers of the second kind, gives us If we let Table of values[edit] If and When.

Inclusion–exclusion principle. The union of sets A and B This formula can be verified by counting how many times each region in the Venn diagram figure is included in the right-hand side of the formula. In this case, when removing the contributions of over-counted elements, the number of elements in the mutual intersection of the three sets has been subtracted too often, so must be added back in to get the correct total. Inclusion–exclusion illustrated by a Venn diagram for three sets As finite probabilities are computed as counts relative to the cardinality of the probability space, the formulas for the principle of inclusion–exclusion remain valid when the cardinalities of the sets are replaced by finite probabilites.

More generally, both versions of the principle can be put under the common umbrella of measure theory. "One of the most useful principles of enumeration in discrete probability and combinatorial theory is the celebrated principle of inclusion–exclusion. Statement[edit] This can be compactly written as . . Curse of dimensionality. The curse of dimensionality refers to various phenomena that arise when analyzing and organizing data in high-dimensional spaces (often with hundreds or thousands of dimensions) that do not occur in low-dimensional settings such as the three-dimensional physical space of everyday experience. The term curse of dimensionality was coined by Richard E. Bellman when considering problems in dynamic optimization.[1][2] The "curse of dimensionality" depends on the algorithm[edit] The "curse of dimensionality" is not a problem of high-dimensional data, but a joint problem of the data and the algorithm being applied.

When facing the curse of dimensionality, a good solution can often be found by changing the algorithm, or by pre-processing the data into a lower-dimensional form. Curse of dimensionality in different domains[edit] Combinatorics[edit] , exponential in the dimensionality. Sampling[edit] Optimization[edit] Machine learning[edit] Bayesian statistics[edit] Distance functions[edit] and dimension . Analytic combinatorics. Classes of combinatorial structures[edit] Consider the problem of distributing objects given by a generating function into a set of n slots, where a permutation group G of degree n acts on the slots to create an equivalence relation of filled slot configurations, and asking about the generating function of the configurations by weight of the configurations with respect to this equivalence relation, where the weight of a configuration is the sum of the weights of the objects in the slots.

We will first explain how to solve this problem in the labelled and the unlabelled case and use the solution to motivate the creation of classes of combinatorial structures. The Pólya enumeration theorem solves this problem in the unlabelled case. Let f(z) be the ordinary generating function (OGF) of the objects, then the OGF of the configurations is given by the substituted cycle index , and on the second slot, . Where the term is used to denote the set of orbits under G and of the symmetric group A class and. Combinatorial principles. In proving results in combinatorics several useful combinatorial rules or combinatorial principles are commonly recognized and used. Rule of sum[edit] The rule of sum is an intuitive principle stating that if there are a possible outcomes for an event (or ways to do something) and b possible outcomes for another event (or ways to do another thing), and the two events cannot both occur (or the two things can't both be done), then there are a + b total possible outcomes for the events (or total possible ways to do one of the things).

More formally, the sum of the sizes of two disjoint sets is equal to the size of their union. Rule of product[edit] The rule of product is another intuitive principle stating that if there are a ways to do something and b ways to do another thing, then there are a · b ways to do both things. Inclusion-exclusion principle[edit] Inclusion–exclusion illustrated for three sets Generally, according to this principle, if A1, ..., An are finite sets, then References[edit] Enumerative combinatorics. Enumerative combinatorics is an area of combinatorics that deals with the number of ways that certain patterns can be formed. Two examples of this type of problem are counting combinations and counting permutations. More generally, given an infinite collection of finite sets Si indexed by the natural numbers, enumerative combinatorics seeks to describe a counting function which counts the number of objects in Sn for each n.

Although counting the number of elements in a set is a rather broad mathematical problem, many of the problems that arise in applications have a relatively simple combinatorial description. The twelvefold way provides a unified framework for counting permutations, combinations and partitions. The simplest such functions are closed formulas, which can be expressed as a composition of elementary functions such as factorials, powers, and so on. For instance, as shown below, the number of different possible orderings of a deck of n cards is f(n) = n!. If as . Where . And. Combinatorics. Algebraic combinatorics. The Fano matroid, derived from the Fano plane. Matroids are one of many areas studied in algebraic combinatorics. Algebraic combinatorics is an area of mathematics that employs methods of abstract algebra, notably group theory and representation theory, in various combinatorial contexts and, conversely, applies combinatorial techniques to problems in algebra.

However, within the last decade or so, algebraic combinatorics came to be seen more expansively as an area of mathematics where the interaction of combinatorial and algebraic methods is particularly strong and significant. Thus the combinatorial topics may be enumerative in nature or involve matroids, polytopes, partially ordered sets, or finite geometries. On the algebraic side, besides group and representation theory, lattice theory and commutative algebra are common. One of the fastest developing subfields within algebraic combinatorics is combinatorial commutative algebra. See also[edit] References[edit]