background preloader

Édifiantes histoires de cinoche

Facebook Twitter

The Lowest-Grossing Movie in American History Finally Makes It to DVD. Is It That Terrible? - Hollywood Prospectus Blog. In 2006, the top-grossing film at the box office was Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest, which played at 4,133 theaters across the United States during its five-month run and earned $423 million. The lowest-grossing film at the box office that year was Zyzzyx Road (pronounced zizz-iks), which played at a single theater in Dallas for one week and earned $30, or .000000071 percent of Pirates’ take. (Actually, it only took home $20 after actor and co-producer Leo Grillo refunded the tickets purchased by Zyzzyx Road’s makeup artist and one of her friends.)

To date, Zyzzyx Road is the lowest-grossing film to ever appear on an American movie screen. And until Tuesday, it wasn’t available on DVD in the United States. In 2007, Entertainment Weekly’s Rob Brunner wrote the definitive story about the circumstances surrounding Zyzzyx Road’s unlikely notoriety. Second, from what I could tell, Zyzzyx Road is a psychological thriller that was supposed to head straight to video/DVD. Alas. Voyage au cœur d'un film qui recrée le Moscou totalitaire. C’est «le premier projet cinématographique de l’Histoire dont le réalisateur ne semble pas vouloir tirer un film»: le magazine GQ consacre un long article au tournage épique de Dau, second film du jeune réalisateur russe Ilya Khrzhanovsky, consacré à la vie d’un physicien de génie, Lev Landau, nobélisé en 1962.

L’envoyé spécial du magazine, Michael Idov, s’est rendu sur le tournage, dans la ville ukrainienne de Kharkov, après avoir entendu des rumeurs sur «le projet de film le plus cher, compliqué et accaparant de tous les temps». Il raconte en détail les quelques jours passés sur un tournage où a été recréé «à l’échelle» le Moscou des années cinquante «sur l’équivalent de deux terrains de football américain», et où travaillent environ 300 personnes pour qui il n’y a pas de plateau mais «l’Institut», pas de réalisateur mais «le Patron». «Du Michael Bay mâtiné de Jérôme Bosch» Des méthodes qui ne font bien sûr pas l’unanimité. «Pouvoir de virer n'importe qui» publicité Devenez fan sur.

Terry Gilliam on his Don Quixote disaster | Film | The Observer. 'Making a film', Terry Gilliam tells me, 'is essentially about two things: belief and momentum. You need those two essential elements, one feeding the other, or things fall apart.' There speaks the voice of experience. Last September, just five days into an ambitious shooting schedule, Gilliam's film, The Man Who Killed Don Quixote, a vision he had nurtured for 10 years, collapsed in the most cruelly ironic fashion. A full five months later, the director, whose belief in the project had propelled its often tortuous progress from script to shoot, is still in grief: more than once he refers to this interview as 'a kind of therapy session'. 'A part of me still doesn't quite believe it happened,' he says, nursing a pre-lunch malt whisky in a Soho private members' club, his natural ebullience suddenly replaced by an uncharacteristically rueful tone.

But not, unfortunately, the end of the story. By then, the proposed budget had gone up to $35m. . © Sean O'Hagan Just GilliamChloe Diski Films. Qui a tué la 3D? L’année dernière, il se murmurait parmi les observateurs de l’industrie du cinéma et les directeurs des studios que le cinéma 3D venait d’entrer dans une ruelle sombre avec son portefeuille rempli de billets. L’été dernier, la 3D apparaissait pourtant comme la réponse à tous les problèmes d’Hollywood: baisse de fréquentation, piratage, home-cinéma.

Les studios venaient d’enregistrer des bénéfices records grâce à une série de blockbusters coûteux: Avatar, Alice au Pays des merveilles, Comment dresser votre dragon, Le choc des Titans, Shrek 4 et Toy Story 3 – une demi-douzaine de films en 3D qui avaient rapporté plus de deux milliards de dollars de recettes aux Etats-Unis. Pourtant, dès la fin du mois d’août 2010, le futur du cinéma semblait à nouveau mal assuré. Les retours du box-office de la vague suivante de films 3D étaient décevants. Le mouvement de renaissance avait besoin d’être ranimé. publicité Identifier la victime est relativement facile. Pour commencer, inspectons le corps. La Guerre des boutons, la vraie de vraie... C'est du jamais-vu.

Au mois de septembre, deux longs-métrages tirés d'un même livre vont sortir quasi en même temps. La Guerre des boutons, donc, d'après Louis Pergaud. D'un côté, un film de Yann Samuell avec Mathilde Seigner, Eric Elmosnino, Alain Chabat et plein d'enfants. De l'autre, un film de Christophe Barratier avec Kad Merad, Laetitia Casta, Guillaume Canet, Gérard Jugnot et plein d'enfants. Le premier est produit par Marc du Pontavice, dont le financement de dessins animés pour la télé a assuré une belle assise, et celui de Gainsbourg, vie héroïque, une belle crédibilité artistique. "Il est vrai que les idées, quand elles sont dans l'air, circulent mystérieusement. " Certes, on se bat beaucoup dans le roman. D'abord, Marc du Pontavice. Ensuite, Thomas Langmann. "Vous ne voulez pas de rien, il faut tout garder. " En octobre 2010, Thomas Langmann approche Canal +.

"Non, on peut le dire, les langues ne chômaient pas. " "Et maintenant, allumons ! " Taking on piracy, profitably. Historically, the home video market in India has been highly fragmented. Before 2007, no single company had been able to capture a significant share as none had the distribution capability or a large content base in multiple languages. Also, rampant piracy was eating into the market share of brands.

The 'legal' players used to price home VCD/DVDs at a large premium and stress the quality difference compared to pirated videos. Though this created a profitable channel, home viewing formed a much smaller share of film industry revenues than it did in markets like the US. Moser Baer, which is today the world's secondlargest producer of blank optical disks, was willing to do so. Delhi-based Moser Baer had invested heavily in manufacturing capabilities to get huge economies of scale. But it was worried that the limited technology life cycle of the disks would make its capacity obsolete and redundant. Explains Puri: "It is relatively easy to put a brand on something and sell it. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

The Good, the Bad and the Hollywood. Whatever happened to Harvey Weinstein's “wow!” Film of 1997? Back in 1997, a headline news story made all film wannabes' jaws drop to the floor. I remember the story became the stuff of legend and even managed to catch my attention though I was deep in production at the time. It was one of those "wow" film tales that captured everyone's imagination. Good ole Harvey Weinstein, co-honcho of Miramax Films at the time, the master of promotion and churning up industry news, had done it again. The story was he had discovered a wannabe's script, optioned it, agreed to let the writer direct it, agreed to let the writer and his band do the music score — and in a pure Harvey gold move just to sweeten the deal — he agreed to "buy the Hollywood bar" for the writer who was working there as a bartender. BAAAM! Through the years, I wondered what the heck happened to this deal?

Well, I just found out. WHAM! In my opinion, Harvey probably just lost interest in the project. Who cares?