Poker theory
Get flash to fully experience Pearltrees
Video Search Results for "galfond" | Bluefire Poker Training
Phil Galfond nous offre pour le temps des Fêtes un nouveau format de vidéo-blogue dans lequel il nous parle des mains les plus mémorables jouées au cours de sa carrière! Read More →
NLHE: 3betting and facing a 3bet - Poker Theory - General Poker Theory Forum
All IMHO. Hey guys. I wrote a similar article about a month ago, but did more research and wanted to release a new version. This is just a pretty standard 3bet article for beginning and intermediate players (and myself, as I write). I think there are at least a few somewhat newer players that will appreciate this post, so I hope you enjoy.
2. Any chance of seeing some PT screenshots for the year? I'm not so much interested in $ won but in things like WWSF, W@SD, aggression and so on. Maybe one filtered for 5-6 handed and one for HU?
The Well: Jman28 (revisisted) - High Stakes Poker Pot Limit and No Limit - High Stakes Poker Forum
Since the dude is good and aggressive we're assuming he's capable of CRing AI with a lot of stuff on the flop and could possible be slowplaying a monster right now. Anyways, as to the answer to your "How much does it matter" question I think we'd have to look at 1) how likley am I to fold a better hand when I flop nothing? 2) how likely am I to get called/raised by a worst hand if I flop something? Now, with A2 and KJ a "missed flop" would consist of all little cards (or some variant of Q52 or something) and if we C-bet in these positions we are unlikely to fold QQ-66 from a smart/thinking player. However, if 88 or 75s misses the flop (like say AQ4) and then we C-bet, we are more likely to fold better hands such as JJ-66 and of course we will fold if we get CR'd all in (which we would have done with A2s and KJo anyways).
(Simple?) 3-bet Scenario - High Stakes Poker Pot Limit and No Limit - High Stakes Poker Forum
When I Was A Poker Donk -- Lars Bonding - Poker News
Lars Bonding In this series, Card Player asks top pros to rewind back to their humble beginnings and provide insights regarding the mistakes, leaks, and deficiencies that they had to overcome in order to improve their games. Lars Bonding is one of the most consistent and aggressive no-limit hold’em tournament players on the circuit today. The Danish poker pro started cashing in major tournaments back in 2005, and since then has accumulated nearly $2.4 million in career earnings. The Las Vegas resident had been on one of the most impressive tears in the history of online poker earlier this year — all before online poker was widely shutdown in the United States. Over the course of a few months, he recorded two wins and a fourth-place finish in the $200 buy-in PokerStars Sunday Warmup , which had consistently drawn more than 4,600 entrants each week.
Classifying Bets & Raises Part 2 - The Risk-Reward Approach - CardSharp
As you’ll recall from last article, there is a well defined system for classifying calls as correct or incorrect using odds math. That math essentially analyzes three relevant facts: That’s all there is to it. The nice thing with a call is that you often have exact numerical values for all three pieces of information. That allows you to do a simple pot odds calculation and decide if a bet is correct or not.Classifying Bets And Raises Part 3 - Aggression Is Overrated - CardSharp
This is probably going to piss some people off, but Bob’s exactly right. For the last 25 years, the poker literature has been pulling a bit of a con on unsuspecting players by claiming in almost unmitigated terms that aggression is good. Now, up to a point they’re right.
Theories of Poker