background preloader

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research

Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of Health Research
Related:  Systematic review

The Pieces of Systematic Review with Margaret Foster Webinar Series | NNLM This series concluded on August 3, 2017. All the sessions were recorded, and links to the recordings can be found below. Please direct any questions to nnlm-scr@unthsc.edu (link sends e-mail) or (817) 735-2223. Check out Margaret Foster's website (link is external) chronicling the series and for a list of related resources, many of which were mentioned throughout the series. You can also order her book, Assembling the Pieces of Systematic Review (link is external), on Amazon. Guest Speaker: Margaret J. Thursday, February 2, 2017 - How do you determine if a research question is right for a systematic review? Speaker Bio: Margaret Foster is an Associate Professor at Texas A&M University and serves as the Systematic Reviews Coordinator at the Medical Sciences Library with a joint position at the School of Public Health and the College of Medicine of the Texas A&M University Health Sciences Center. Session 1 Topic: How do you determine if a research question is right for a systematic review?

RSS PRISMA What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences Authoring GRADE working group Covidence and Rayyan Guides Equator > About EQUATOR > EQUATOR publications > EQUATOR Network publications 2010 Simera I, Moher D, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research. Eur J Clin Invest. 2010;40(1):35-53. PMID: 20055895 Full text (Eur J Clin Invest – open access) To view or print the current list of identified guidelines available on the EQUATOR website please see: – current full list (updated 23 August 2013) Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Moher D, Schulz KF, Simera I, Altman DG. Altman DG, Simera I.

HLWIKI Canada Levels I through III are the "data extraction" components of the SR, and require robust software for inclusion/exclusion process Are you interested in contributing to HLWIKI International?contact: dean.giustini@ubc.ca To browse other articles on a range of HSL topics, see the A-Z index. Last Update 24 June 2016 Introduction See also Bibliographic citation software | Expert searching | Search filters & hedges | Hand-searching | Network meta-analysis | RefWorks | Systematic reviews | Systematic review librarian What is the purpose of a systematic review (SR)? "...a systematic review seeks to identify as many potentially relevant studies as possible that meet the research question for a given topic" — NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Before starting your systematic review See also Systematic review toolbox community-driven, searchable, web-based catalogue of tools that support the systematic review process across multiple domains. Covidence EndNote RefWorks See RefWorks

Related: