File sharing Types of file sharing[edit] Peer-to-peer file sharing[edit] File sync and sharing services[edit] Cloud-based file syncing and sharing services allow users to create special folders on each of their computers or mobile devices, which the service then synchronizes so that it appears to be the same folder regardless of which computer is used to view it. rsync is a more traditional program released in 1996 which synchronizes files on a direct machine-to-machine basis. History[edit] Files were first exchanged on removable media. In June 1999, Napster was released as an unstructured centralized peer-to-peer system,[1] requiring a central server for indexing and peer discovery. Gnutella, eDonkey2000, and Freenet were released in 2000, as MP3.com and Napster were facing litigation. In July 2001, Napster was sued by several recording companies and lost in A&M Records, Inc. v. In 2009, the Pirate Bay trial ended in a guilty verdict for the primary founders of the tracker. Effects of file sharing[edit]
FILEnetworks Blog FileCrop L'envoi de gros fichiers n'a jamais été aussi simple ! Play The Net - Accueil Download DropUpLoad Freeware! DropUpLoad is awarded by many distributors: Since its version 1.80d, DropUpLoad manages the file transfers while fully dealing with Chinese, Arab, or any other non-ASCII characters. It has been successfully tested with Serv-U, zFTPServer, FileZilla Server and many UNIX servers. Here is some information intended for users having troubles with this type of file names and FTP transfers. 1 - ASCII codes, UTF8 and Unicode The Western characters are generally coded in ASCII. This problem became completely insoluble when the data processing specialists wanted to manage the Chinese alphabet (more than 2000 characters) and a lot of other alphabets (Arab, Greek, etc) which are competely different from the Western model. The ISO 10646 standard - more often called “Unicode” - was so intended to define a general principle of management of international characters. Since Windows 98, Microsoft manages characters using the Unicode standard and uses the UTF16 encoding system for the main of its softwares.
TNT Village scambio etico Demandes de suppression de contenu protégé par des droits d'auteur – Google Transparency Report Qu'est-ce qui est inclus ? Qu'est-ce qui ne l'est pas ? Les données ci-dessous correspondent aux demandes de suppression de liens pour cause de violation de droits d'auteur que nous avons reçues par le biais de notre formulaire Web pour l'application Recherche Google. C'est un rapport historique partiel qui comprend plus de 95 % des demandes de suppression de liens pour cause de violation de droits d'auteur que nous avons reçues pour la recherche Google depuis juillet 2011.
Best Poker Torrents - The best Poker Torrent site Comparison of file sharing applications File sharing is a method of distributing electronically stored information such as computer programs and digital media. Below is a list of file sharing applications, most of them make use of peer-to-peer file sharing technologies. This comparison contains next to file sharing applications also download managers that can be used as file sharing applications (using the torrent-protocol). For pure download managers see the Comparison of download managers. Table[edit] Comparison pages[edit] File sharing web applications[edit] A web application, unlike a software, does not need to be installed on the computer. See also[edit] Notes[edit]
FileSharing Talk - BitTorrent, Usenet, NZB, Verified Hashes, ED2K, Kazaa Lite and Discussion Partage de fichiers Un article de Wikipédia, l'encyclopédie libre. Pour les articles homonymes, voir Partage. Deux techniques de partage de fichiers existent actuellement : Le partage en pair-à-pair[modifier | modifier le code] Le partage centralisé[modifier | modifier le code] Ce type de partage existe tant sur des réseaux fermés qu'ouverts. Certains sites sont généralistes et permettent le partage de toutes sortes de fichiers et de données tandis que d'autres se sont spécialisés dans le partage de fichiers vidéo ou d'images. Le partage temporaire[modifier | modifier le code] Le partage temporaire de fichiers permet à un utilisateur de mettre à disposition d'autres personnes un ensemble de fichiers sur une période donnée (souvent assez courte). Les sites de partage de fichiers temporaires proposent souvent en parallèle un outil de transfert de fichiers. Les controverses liées au partage de fichiers[modifier | modifier le code] Le partage de fichiers est critiqué sur plusieurs de ses aspects:
ACTA rapporteur denounces ACTA masquerade Source: ACTA : une mascarade à laquelle je ne participerai pas - Kader Arif Kader Arif, rapporteur for ACTA in the European Parliament quit his role as rapporteur saying: ”I want to denounce in the strongest possible manner the entire process that led to the signature of this agreement: no inclusion of civil society organisations, a lack of transparency from the start of the negotiations, repeated postponing of the signature of the text without an explanation being ever given, exclusion of the EU Parliament's demands that were expressed on several occasions in our assembly.” “As rapporteur of this text, I have faced never-before-seen manoeuvres from the right wing of this Parliament to impose a rushed calendar before public opinion could be alerted, thus depriving the Parliament of its right to expression and of the tools at its disposal to convey citizens' legitimate demands.” [edit] Original version (FR) :
SOPA, Internet regulation, and the economics of piracy Earlier this month, I detailed at some length why claims about the purported economic harms of piracy, offered by supporters of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and PROTECT-IP Act (PIPA), ought to be treated with much more skepticism than they generally get from journalists and policymakers. My own view is that this ought to be rather secondary to the policy discussion: SOPA and PIPA would be ineffective mechanisms for addressing the problem, and a terrible idea for many other reasons, even if the numbers were exactly right. No matter how bad last season's crops were, witch burnings are a poor policy response. Fortunately, legislators finally seem to be cottoning on to this: SOPA now appears to be on ice for the time being, and PIPA's own sponsors are having second thoughts about mucking with the Internet's Domain Name System. Decreasing creative output? One reason is that they already are recapturing much of that revenue through "complementary" purchases.