PPI-Vigilancia tecnológica e inteligencia competitiva. Competitive intelligence. Competitive intelligence essentially means understanding and learning what's happening in the world outside your business so you can be as competitive as possible. It means learning as much as possible—as soon as possible—about your industry in general, your competitors, or even your county's particular zoning rules.
In short, it empowers you to anticipate and face challenges head on.[1] Key points of this definition: Competitive intelligence is an ethical and legal business practice, as opposed to industrial espionage, which is illegal. [according to whom?] The focus is on the external business environment[2]There is a process involved in gathering information, converting it into intelligence and then utilizing this in business decision making. A more focused definition of CI regards it as the organizational function responsible for the early identification of risks and opportunities in the market before they become obvious.
Historic development[edit] Product – what are people selling? Does Your Strategy Match Your Competitive Environment? - Martin Reeves. By Martin Reeves | 12:00 PM August 28, 2012 How predictable are competitive conditions in your industry? How much power does your company have to shape its underlying competitive environment? These questions are critical to strategists, since clearly the kinds of strategies that work in predictable industries are likely to be worlds apart from those geared to shaping highly volatile environments. This should hardly surprise you. In our recent research, we’ve found that fully three-quarters of the executives we surveyed at 120 companies around the world in 10 major industry sectors were well aware of the need to match their strategies — and the process by which they create them — to the specific conditions of their competitive environment.
And yet, our research also found far too many were employing strategies suited only for predictable and immutable industries. To understand the scope of this problem, take a look at this chart: Our research on this point is unequivocal. Quartz Communications · Competitive Intelligence: 5 things you can learn about your competition through social media. 2 Ways to Spot Industry-Changing Trends - Management Tip of the Day - August 17, 2011. Gagein: A New Way of Tracking Corporate Business News. If you are trying to keep track of your competitors, you have a variety of tools that can make your search for business news easier.
At the low end (meaning free) is Google Alerts and Google News, and you can build your own RSS feed collection and examine what comes through that pipeline. There are also paid gathering tools from Hoovers, Lexus and InsideView.com, just to name a couple of examples. GageIn is trying to enter this market with the release of its Content Platform and the integration with Salesforce and LinkedIn data repositories. The trick is in the filtering, to be sure: you don't want to plow through irrelevant searches or receive too few alerts about the things that you want to track. "The quality of content I receive is unbeatable. I now spend less time searching for stories about prospects, competitors and my industry and more time engaging my audience," says Kelly Morgan, director of marketing at HealthRx and an early user of the GageIn service. Industry Analysis Is Dead. What's Next? - Rita McGrath.
By Rita McGrath | 12:54 PM January 19, 2012 One of the most widely held beliefs in strategy is that variations in performance can often be explained by what industry a company competes in. A lot of our most cherished tools — five-forces analysis, the BCG portfolio matrix, and even SWOT analysis — rest on this assumption. But evidence is all around us that, although industries matter, they matter in different ways and with different effects than we may have thought.
To take one example that crossed my desk recently, consultancy Accenture has developed a point of view on what they call the “Age of Aggregation.” But as they also point out, the most important competition for many organizations today comes from firms who aren’t even technically competing in the same business. This change promises to generate considerable confusion, because the concept of industry is so deeply embedded in our analytical and organizational tools. Open innovation. Open innovation is a term promoted by Henry Chesbrough, adjunct professor and faculty director of the Center for Open Innovation at the Haas School of Business at the University of California,[1] in a book of the same name,[2] though the idea and discussion about some consequences (especially the interfirm cooperation in R&D) date as far back as the 1960s[citation needed]. Some instances of open innovation are Open collaboration,[3] a pattern of collaboration, innovation, and production.
The concept is also related to user innovation, cumulative innovation, know-how trading, mass innovation and distributed innovation. “Open innovation is a paradigm that assumes that firms can and should use external ideas as well as internal ideas, and internal and external paths to market, as the firms look to advance their technology”.[2] Alternatively, it is "innovating with partners by sharing risk and sharing reward. Advantages[edit] Disadvantages[edit] Models of open innovation[edit] See also[edit] El código de los laboratorios de innovación. El caso de Medialab Prado. Llevamos un tiempo pensando y prototipando los modelos de laboratorios de innovación, tanto como parte de las estrategias empresariales, como para la incubación o aceleración de nuevas empresas o aquellos pensados para la acción ciudadana. Por una parte, los modelos de innovación abierta necesitan de este tipo de espacios y procesos.
Por otra parte, el empoderamiento ciudadano y la participación pro-activa se facilitan cuando existe un espacio público real y efectivo, y un laboratorio ciudadano es una forma de materializar esa idea de espacio público. Medialab Prado constituye un caso paradigmático de laboratorio en el que además se mezclan procesos relacionados con la cultura, la tecnología y el diseño, con el activismo cívico y diferentes formas de emprendimiento social.
Desde mi punto de vista, Medialab se conforma por 4 capas de herramientas, cultura y procesos. 1. 2. 3. Innovación Gestión de la Innovación y de la I+D+i Parque Tecnológico Andalucía. Los 57 libros imprescindibles para entender la innovación abierta. Empresa abierta, empresa del procomún. No me cabe ninguna duda de que los territorios de la empresa abierta son difusos. Su licuosidad hace que sea fácil encontrar otros planteamientos hermanos de los que nutrirse y a los que, espero, podamos aportar. El apellido “social” es uno de los que mejor define su esencia. Sea cual sea la manera en que se concreta este poderoso carácter social, son dos los anclajes que siempre encontramos: Va más allá del resultado económico como esencia de la medición de éxito o fracaso.
Dicho lo anterior, uno de los territorios donde confluyen ideas es la denominada “empresa del procomún” EdP. Las Empresas del Procomún son aquellas cuya actividad y modelos organizativos generan un ecosistema de valor diferencial y cualitativo, basado en la gestión de un recurso en comunidad, según unos principios éticos, pensando los criterios monetarios en clave de sostenibilidad. La EdP gira alrededor de tres ejes: recurso, comunidad y gobernanza. Aplicaciones 2.0 para referencias bibliográficas | Inteligencia Competitiva Web | Mentalidad Web. Para todos aquellos que nos dedicamos medianamente a la investigación, el tiempo de las fichas bibliográficas en cuadernos o en papel se acabó, o al menos así debiera ser.
Personalmente nunca me ha tocado hacer una de esas fichas sobre fuentes primarias al estilo Umberto Eco en Cómo se hace una tesis. Por suerte para quienes empezamos a adentrarnos en el mundo de la investigación ni siquiera tenemos que hacer esas fichas en Excel o en Access tratando de crear bases de datos complejas. Tampoco es necesario gastarnos el dinero en un programa de elite como Endnote. ¿Para qué si la web es colaborativa y se basa en la inteligencia colectiva? Si la premisa más importante de la web 2.0 es que el usuario es el rey, entonces hagamos uso de los recursos que existen en la red que nos pueden facilitar la vida a la hora de realizar una investigación. Nosotros hemos analizado algunas de las aplicaciones para referencias bibliográficas online: Empresa Abierta | Pasión por Innovar. Después de varios meses de trabajo, tenemos el placer de presentar el estudio de Economía Abierta que hemos desarrollado en EOI dentro del proyecto Nueva Economía 20+20.
Este proyecto tiene como objetivo “identificar y analizar experiencias empresariales de éxito, creativas y originales representativas de los valores y usos de la nueva economía”. La investigación sobre los Sectores de la Nueva Economía pretende ser un proyecto continuado en el tiempo en el que se investiguen 20 sectores a lo largo de diversas fases a través del estudio de 20 empresas por cada sector, con el fin de configurar un extenso y complejo mapa de la Nueva Economía. En esta primera fase se han analizado 100 empresas de cinco sectores de la Nueva Economía para detectar las iniciativas de éxito que configuran y determinan sus modelos de negocio. Los primeros cinco sectores son los siguientes: Economía SocialEconomía DigitalIndustrias de la CreatividadIndustrias de Economía AbiertaEconomía Verde.
Web 2.0. Websites that use technology beyond the static pages of the early Internet Web 2.0 (also known as participative (or participatory)[1] web and social web)[2] refers to websites that emphasize user-generated content, ease of use, participatory culture, and interoperability (i.e., compatibility with other products, systems, and devices) for end users. The term was coined by Darcy DiNucci in 1999[3] and later popularized by Tim O'Reilly and Dale Dougherty at the first Web 2.0 Conference in 2004.[4][5][6] Although the term mimics the numbering of software versions, it does not denote a formal change in the nature of the World Wide Web;[7] the term merely describes a general change that occurred during this period as interactive websites proliferated and came to overshadow the older, more static websites of the original Web.[2] Some Web 2.0 capabilities were present in the days of Web 1.0, but were implemented differently.
Some common design elements of a Web 1.0 site include:[17] Search Tags. Academic search engines for research and Information. Dotster Call Sales 800-401-5250 Hosting and Email Domains Website Services I Want To ... Start a Website Questions? Awards & Accreditations ICANN Accredited Registrarnameintelligence 2007 Users Choice AwardWebhost Directory Award Winner #1 In Shared HostingBest Budget Host Award by HostReview.com We Dot What You Want © 2016 Dotster. 99 Resources to Research & Mine the Invisible Web. College researchers often need more than Google and Wikipedia to get the job done. To find what you're looking for, it may be necessary to tap into the invisible web, the sites that don't get indexed by broad search engines.
The following resources were designed to help you do just that, offering specialized search engines, directories, and more places to find the complex and obscure. Search Engines Whether you're looking for specific science research or business data, these search engines will point you in the right direction. Turbo10: On Turbo10, you'll be able to search more than 800 deep web search engines at a time. Databases Tap into these databases to access government information, business data, demographics, and beyond. GPOAccess: If you're looking for US government information, tap into this tool that searches multiple databases at a time.
Catalogs If you're looking for something specific, but just don't know where to find it, these catalogs will offer some assistance. Directories. 165 Herramientas Web 2.0 distribuidas en 20 categorías. Herramientas 2.0. قالب وردپرسافزونه وردپرسقالب صحیفهافزونه Yoast Seo Premium.
Knowledge management. Knowledge management (KM) is the process of capturing, developing, sharing, and effectively using organizational knowledge.[1] It refers to a multi-disciplined approach to achieving organisational objectives by making the best use of knowledge.[2] An established discipline since 1991 (see Nonaka 1991), KM includes courses taught in the fields of business administration, information systems, management, and library and information sciences.[3][4] More recently, other fields have started contributing to KM research; these include information and media, computer science, public health, and public policy.[5] Columbia University and Kent State University offer dedicated Master of Science degrees in Knowledge Management.[6][7][8] History[edit] In 1999, the term personal knowledge management was introduced; it refers to the management of knowledge at the individual level.[14] Research[edit] Dimensions[edit] The Knowledge Spiral as described by Nonaka & Takeuchi.
Strategies[edit] Motivations[edit] Knowledge Management: Making It Work (David Skyrme) Knowledge Management: Making It Work Dr David J. Skyrme A growing number of organizations are embracing knowledge management as a key strategic initiative. Among the pioneers are professional service organizations, most notably management consultancies, whose primary resource is knowledge. From Fad to Fundamental It was only two years ago that surveys showed that over half of European and UK managers thought that knowledge management was a fad. Knowledge management in its current form first received significant attention in 1995, with the publication of the seminal book The Knowledge Creating Company(2), and the Knowledge Imperative Symposium, cosponsored by Arthur Andersen and APQC (American Productivity and Quality Centre), and held in Houston that September. This new knowledge industry for knowledge shows that knowledge is currently a ‘hot topic’.
An increasing proportion of today’s wealth creating industries are knowledge intensive. Strategies That Work Customer knowledge. Strategic Knowledge Management. II Congreso Internacional AE-IC Málaga 2010 "Comunicación y desarrollo en la era digital" IJMCP_paper. The evolution of knowledge management and the Technology Eras hypothesis « Short Takes. The Evolution of Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management evolution - tool, toolbox, framework. Information_Management_Strategyv1. Strategic Knowledge Management. Strategic Knowledge Management. Improving Mission Performance Through Strategic IM. SIM_9.15.08. Knowledge Management Strategies: Formulation and Evolution | KM.
Strategic Knowledge Management & Knowledge Networking Platform. Strategic_Information_Management. Strategic Knowledge Management. Strategic Knowledge Management & Knowledge Networking Platform. Ltd. Knowledge management consultants. Knowledge2.