My experience with sexual offender residency laws is limited by Miami-Dade County, FL laws as well as the cities within the county's boundaries. Every state, city and community has developed various laws, and consequently experience different things with the implementation of those laws. Therefore, please don't consider my findings as a rule of thumb. I would like to ask readers to consider my findings and apply them to their personal experiences. Maybe , by making this the basis of a discussion, a consistent solution to this issue could be discovered.
The most significant issue for Miami-Dade sex offenders is that they are generally classified into two categories 1. The person is currently on probation, and meets with a probation officer , who examines his location as well as his abiding by the the conditions for his parole. 2. The person has served his sentence and is required to submit his address at least at least four times per year at the Sheriff's Office (Miami-Dade County has an Police Department). The police will inspect the addresses periodically and make sure they're in compliance with regulations and laws.
The problem in the second scenario is that the perpetrator might provide an untrue address which proves that they are in compliance with the law or register as homeless, allowing them to reside anywhere. There is no way for police to establish that someone is not living at an address , or that they aren't actually homeless. Sexual offenders could own an apartment right next to the playground or school and declare himself homeless and live his existence. The fact that he is at the address doesn't mean that the person lives there. The police could be forced to keep an eye on my address and show that he lived there for the period which the law requires to prove that the resident is at the location. Be aware that you may have a home but not reside in the house. Even offenders on probation who have curfews are allowed to be able to sleep in another place that they've given as their address. They will return to their home when the curfew expires (in Florida most Sex Offender curfews last from 10pm to 6am and they are free to leave the house at any time your children are going to school). For night fun in Hinjewadi visit here: https://www.ruchitasinha.com/hinjewadi-escorts.php
Another issue that comes with restrictions on residency is a phenomenon known as pooling. Certain communities are enough from parks and schools that they can be considered legal for sexual offenders to reside. The majority of sex offenders will begin to move to the area, or even pool there. The community is then flooded with sexual offenders. The normal reaction is to make laws that cause sexual offenders to leave and join a new community. The process is repeated across counties and cities. Sexual offenders often disappear, while others list themselves as homeless and live wherever they'd like to live.
My solution to closing the loopholes mentioned above would be to replace the aforementioned replacement of residency restrictions by GPS monitoring. This would provide both the victims and police and communities accurate information about the whereabouts of sexual offenders both during the day and at night. GPS monitors will allow police to track exactly where to find sexual offenders throughout the night or day. This would enable the police to pinpoint where an offenders' real residence is and also if he's violating or no-lootering zones in schools or day care centers. Most importantly, if an offender pulls off his strap , police will be immediately alerted and be able to determine the address of the sex offender at the time of the incident and either arrest him or issue an BOLO (Be On The Look Out). This will be more efficient instead of waiting on the perpetrator to not register.
Additional benefits include that this equipment can be used to alert victims or schools, day cares and so on. If a sex offenders is within a certain number of feet of their premises. This allows employees to become more attentive to protecting the children in their care, and alert the police in case there's a problem. This information will offer real security for people in the community, instead of the empty promise of security that is being provided.
Now , the downside... The cost! These equipments aren't cheap and must be maintained. A lot of them will be damaged, stolen or even destroyed. Police must also ensure that staff or officers monitor the location of sexual offenders and respond to alarms. But, these costs have to be considered against the expense of another child being molested. It is a choice that local leaders and law makers should take.
If a community chooses to adopt GPS Monitoring, I suggest that the community remove all restrictions on residency and begin an information campaign to inform residents about who the sex offenders within their community are, and where they reside. Information is the best defense. The residents should also be aware of what type of sexual offense suspect was arrested for and not accused of. There could be a significant distinction between what someone is detained for and the charges they are charged with. The arrest details will enable residents to determine the kind of sex offender they are in the neighborhood (remember that the person who is a sex offender in your area could be a 35-year-old man who, when he reached 18 was dating a 15 year old girlfriend who was a week away from turning 16 and now is married to the victim and has two kids during their 10 years of marriage. If you had the details about this sex offender, you would deal with him differently than if you had known the perpetrator had molested an infant boy aged 5).
Another benefit could be that the criminal will be able to locate a new home and perhaps learn how to integrate back to society. Someone who has an issue to lose is more manageable than someone who has nothing. The residency laws continue to put the offenders in a position of being in a position where they have nothing, causing many of them to repeat their offenses. The worst part is when an offender realizes that he would be better off in jail before deciding to play around before returning to prison. This is definitely a scenario we don't would like to be in.