background preloader

The revolving door

Facebook Twitter

Revolving Doors Matter. By James Kwak It is common fare for people like me to point disapprovingly to the revolving door between business and government, which ensures that every Treasury Department is well stocked with representatives of Goldman Sachs.

Revolving Doors Matter

In 13 Bankers, the revolving door was one of the three major channels through which the financial sector influenced government policy, alongside campaign contributions and the ideology of finance. The counterargument comes in various forms: people like Robert Rubin and Henry Paulson are dedicated civil servants who wouldn’t favor their firms or their industries, the government needs people with appropriate industry experience, etc. It is certainly possible that industry experts provide valuable skills and experience to the government. But that value comes with a cost; put another way, it’s not just the public good that benefits. » Goldman Sachs: Investing in political influence Alex Jones. David GutierrezNatural News April 15, 2012 (NaturalNews) A Venn diagram released by Harvard law professor and political activist Larry Lessig reveals the shocking connections between our government and banking and investment giant Goldman Sachs.

» Goldman Sachs: Investing in political influence Alex Jones

Click for full image. Goldman Sachs was a major contributor to (and beneficiary of) the 2007 subprime mortgage crisis that helped initiate the current depression. The Political Economy Of Third World Intervention: Mines, Money, And U.S. Policy In The Congo Crisis. J.P. Morgan Banker Selected for FDIC. Summers: “Inside Job had essentially all its facts wrong” In mid-2009, I went on a search for apologies, from the people who laid the intellectual and regulatory foundations for the financial crisis.

Summers: “Inside Job had essentially all its facts wrong”

I wondered whether and when Larry Summers, in particular, would apologize for what he did at Treasury, and I was heartened when Bill Clinton came out and said that, with hindsight, he was wrong about derivatives regulation. Then, in 2010, Inside Job came out, and demonstrated the need for the likes of Summers to be asked direct questions about their culpability on the record, on-camera. But Summers refused to be interviewed for that film, despite having known its director, Charles Ferguson, for many years. And when he does sit down for a rare on-the-record video interview, these questions never seem to get asked.

So I was very happy to see that Krishnan Guru-Murthy at least tried to ask Summers these questions earlier this week. And Summers doesn’t even come close to apologizing, or admitting that he made any kind of mistake at all. “You didn’t?” The new WH Chief of Staff and Citigroup. (updated below) When President Obama last January announced the departure of Rahm Emanuel as White House Chief of Staff, many liberals were furious that his replacement was the Midwest Chairman of JP Morgan and Boeing Director William Daley, who was also an opponent of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and a critic of Obama’s health care bill as too leftist.

The new WH Chief of Staff and Citigroup

As but one example, Rachel Maddow harshly condemned the choice, noting Daley was a hedge fund manager and “business lobbyist” and “is known for pushing Democrats toward business interests”; said “liberals are banging their heads against the wall as they try to comprehend this choice”; and then sardonically observed: “mmm – a banker and a lobbyist: smells like change.” Yesterday, the White House announced Daley’s departure — he will now co-chair Obama’s re-election campaign, which basically means raising huge amounts of money from his Wall Street friends — and unveiled his replacement as Chief of Staff: Jacob Lew. Two Former Watchdogs Ring in the New Year on the Other Side of the Revolving Door. By NEIL GORDON Welcome to another episode of "As the Washington Revolving Door Turns.

Two Former Watchdogs Ring in the New Year on the Other Side of the Revolving Door

" The two latest ex-government officials to land jobs with private companies formerly served as very high-profile watchdogs of those companies. The first revolver is Michael Thibault, former co-chairman and commissioner of the Commission on Wartime Contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan (CWC). The CWC released its final report in August and officially sunset a month later—with all of its internal records sealed from public view until 2031, unfortunately. Last month, Thibault joined DynCorp International as its vice president of government finance and compliance.

DynCorp, one of the three primary LOGCAP IV contractors, is currently the 32nd largest contractor in POGO’s Federal Contractor Misconduct Database. The second revolver is Gordon Heddell, who resigned as the Pentagon’s Inspector General on Christmas Eve. Booz Allen confirmed with POGO that Heddell was hired last month as a Senior Executive Advisor. Should Bankers Serve on Federal Reserve Bank Boards? - Daniel Indiviglio - Business.

A new GAO report finds conflicts-of-interest present.

Should Bankers Serve on Federal Reserve Bank Boards? - Daniel Indiviglio - Business

Does the system need reform? What the Report Says Persistent Fed critic Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) seized on the report to cite these conflicts-of-interest. An amendment by Sanders to the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill actually called for this investigation in the first place. Blue Dogs, decimated by defeats and retirements, turn to lobbying shops. Almost a third of the Blue Dog Democrats who retired or were defeated in 2010 have gone to work for organizations that lobby their former colleagues in Congress, according to an iWatch News review.

Blue Dogs, decimated by defeats and retirements, turn to lobbying shops

The Blue Dog ranks were devastated by the 2010 election, falling from a high of 54 to 26. Of those no longer in Congress, eight have moved through the “revolving door” to employment with lobbying entities. The conservative Blue Dogs formed a key voting bloc for much of the last congressional session, drawing impressive fundraising from energy, financial and health care industry groups hoping to impact proposed legislation from the Obama administration.

Revolving Door Makes Lobbying Cheaper and More Effective. Revolving Door Makes Lobbying Cheaper and More Effective June 14, 2011 - by Donny Shaw The conclusions will probably come as a surprise exactly none of you, but a new study from the International Monetary Fund on the influence of campaign donations and lobbying politics is worth a mention because of the completeness of the research and the authority of its source.

Revolving Door Makes Lobbying Cheaper and More Effective

Two IMF economists, Deniz Igan and Prachi Mishra, have been examining how the targeted political activities of financial corporations between 1999 and 2006 affected how Congress voted on bills that strengthened or loosened regulation of Wall Street leading up to the 2008 crisis. They found — surprise! Study shows revolving door of employment between Congress, lobbying firms. The report, which tallies a greater number of workers moving between Congress and lobbying than found in previous studies, underscores the symbiotic relationship: Thousands of lobbyists are able to exploit experience and connections gleaned from working inside the legislative process, and lawmakers find in lobbyists a ready pool of experienced talent.

Of the 5,400 lobbyists with recent Hill experience, the study found that 2,900 were registered to lobby on behalf of clients this year. Twenty-five powerhouse firms and organizations employ 10 or more former Hill workers.